Canada, the country furthest from meeting its commitment to cut carbon emissions under the Kyoto Protocol, may save as much as US$6.7 billion by exiting the global climate change agreement and not paying for offset credits.
The country’s greenhouse-gas emissions are almost a third higher than 1990 levels, and it has a 6 percent carbon dioxide reduction target for the end of next year. If it could not meet its goal, Canada would have to buy carbon credits, under the rules of the legally binding treaty.
Canada, which has the world’s third-largest proven oil reserves, would be the first of 191 signatories to the Kyoto Protocol to annul its emission-reduction obligations. While Canadian Environment Minister Peter Kent declined to confirm on Nov. 28 that Canada was preparing to pull out of Kyoto, which may ease the burden for oil-sands producers and coal-burning utilities, he said the government would not make further commitments to it.
“Canada is the only country in the world saying it won’t honor Kyoto,” Toronto-based Greenpeace energy and climate policy analyst Keith Stewart said.
Under the previous Liberal government, Canada was one of the first countries to sign Kyoto in 1998. The current Conservative government made a non-binding commitment at 2009 UN talks in Copenhagen to reduce emissions by 17 percent by 2020 from 2005 levels, in line with a pledge by the US, its biggest trading partner.
The biggest polluters in the nation of 34 million say they will cut emissions without a treaty.
“Kyoto no longer works,” said Rick George, chief executive officer of Suncor Energy Inc, Canada’s largest oil producer.
“Whatever happens with Kyoto won’t change our direction” of reducing the environmental impact of oil production, he said.
For Suncor and Canadian Natural Resources Ltd, technology improvements will have a bigger impact on Canada’s greenhouse gas output than an international climate-change treaty, University of Calgary School of Public Policy director Jack Mintz said.
“Technology is the only way we’re going to make significant progress,” Mintz said in an interview. “A lot of companies are already anticipating that the federal government will look at new regulations. Kyoto hasn’t been a strong treaty.”
Canada would likely avoid penalties if it exited the treaty before the end of the year, said Matt Horne, climate change policy director at the Pembina Institute, a Canadian think tank focused on sustainable energy. Kyoto’s first commitment period from 2008 until next year requires reductions only from so-called “Annex I” countries, the world’s wealthiest and most developed. It does not include developing nations, including India and China, the world’s biggest carbon dioxide emitter.
“Penalties apply in the second commitment period,” Horne said. “More importantly though, Canada’s international reputation will be tarnished.”
The US$6.7 billion cost of complying with Kyoto compares with an estimated C$75.9 billion (US$74.54 billion) in combined budget deficits projected through the fiscal year ending March 2015. By rejecting the accord, Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper is putting the country’s economy at risk, Green Party leader Elizabeth May said in an interview.
“We’re condemning ourselves to rising costs from extreme weather events, as well as opportunity costs like the failure to have a renewable-energy industry,” she said. “The world would be grateful for Canada to be constructive instead of the government consistently repudiating Kyoto.”
Canadian delegates, including Kent, are in Durban, South Africa, for UN climate talks. Negotiators are struggling to agree to a successor to Kyoto, which expires at the end of next year and is also opposed by Japan and Russia.
Negotiators from host South Africa urged Canada on Thursday to reconsider its position about not entering another commitment period, highlighting the risks to the developing world with rising temperatures and sea levels.
“Our government believes that the previous Liberal government signing on to Kyoto was one of the biggest blunders they made,” Kent said on Nov. 28.
“Kyoto is the past, Copenhagen and Cancun are the future,” he said, referring to the 2009 Copenhagen Accord.
Canada will have likely emitted about 807 million tonnes of carbon dioxide above its Kyoto target by the end of the first commitment period next year, based on annual emissions data compiled by Bloomberg. Carbon Emission Reduction credits (CER), cost US$6.85 a tonne on Wednesday last week, according to Bloomberg data.
Unlike countries such as Germany, Canada has implemented no policy to reach its targets and will find it difficult to reach even the Copenhagen Accord goals, Stewart said.
Already, 60 percent of the country’s electricity is generated by hydroelectric power plants, which emit fewer gases than coal or natural gas, while the government’s plan to become an energy superpower by exporting crude oil from Alberta’s oil sands means the country faces “steep” increases in emissions in the coming years, Stewart said.
Emissions of carbon from oil sands production has risen to about 6.5 percent of Canada’s total from about 1 percent in 1990, according to the Pembina Institute.
That figure will likely double by 2020 as companies such as Exxon Mobil Corp, Suncor and Royal Dutch Shell PLC expand operations to refine bitumen with annual investments of C$20 billion.
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
When a recall campaign targeting the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators was launched, something rather disturbing happened. According to reports, Hualien County Government officials visited several people to verify their signatures. Local authorities allegedly used routine or harmless reasons as an excuse to enter people’s house for investigation. The KMT launched its own recall campaigns, targeting Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers, and began to collect signatures. It has been found that some of the KMT-headed counties and cities have allegedly been mobilizing municipal machinery. In Keelung, the director of the Department of Civil Affairs used the household registration system
RSS