Ma is different
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has complained that his proposed peace agreement with China has drawn criticism, whereas former presidents Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) and Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) were able to talk about the topic without such a backlash. Ma believe this double standard applies because he is a “Mainlander.”
However, if that were a big issue Ma would not have been elected president in 2008. The basic problem is his thinking and performance.
Ma’s father asked him to “dissolve independence and gradually achieve unification,” and Ma himself has declared a desire for “eventual unification.” He even named one of his daughters “Only China” (唯中) — nothing but China.
Ma thinks his peace proposal is exactly the camouflage he needs to pursue unification. His “golden decade” might mean unification in 10 years. He has completely forgotten his promise to not negotiate if China has missiles aimed at Taiwan.
There is a broad consensus in Taiwan that Ma is incompetent. Some people even call him a “Diarrhea Horse” or a poor performer. His lack of negotiating skills worries Taiwanese.
Ma loves Taiwan only when he runs for president. In the last election, he said he would be Taiwanese even after he was cremated. For next year’s election, he now says he is Taiwanese because his kin are buried in Taiwan.
Ma was acquitted of pocketing public money when he was Taipei City mayor. Chen has been jailed for years, ever since handing over power to Ma, and Lee is being indicted despite having left the presidential office 11 years ago. Ma is the only favorite son of the law.
When Wu Po-hsiung (吳伯雄) was Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman, Ma asked him to “divest the KMT of its assets,” but now that Ma is party chairman and president, he has decided to hold onto them for use in KMT campaigns. In contrast, Democratic Progressive Party Chairperson Tsai Ing-Wen (蔡英文) depends on small donations from the public.
Charles Hong
Columbus, Ohio
Getting it right
The other day I received a letter from a top corporate newspaper company in Texas, delivered to my local post office box, with a computerized address label that correctly spelled my name and box number, but ended with the words: “Chiayi, Taiwan, -Province of China.”
Now I’ve seen everything. My address was printed on corporate stationary and was part of an window envelope. When I wrote back and told the company in question that Taiwan is not part of China and certainly not a province of China, a secretary wrote back and apologized for the mistake. She blamed it on the corporate computer that uses a “one China” map of foreign countries that simply does not list Taiwan as a nation.
This is not an isolated incident. In fact, many corporate computer systems in the US are incorrectly set up to address mail to Taiwan as a “Province of China.”
It is not the fault of the US Postal Service, it is the fault of the UN and those private companies that use Beijing-licensed addressing equipment.
Dan Bloom
Chiayi
The power of reading
Lii Ding-tzann (李丁讚) says that reading in a way that connects to your own life can make a powerful contribution to an individual’s intellectual development (“Reading your way to true wisdom,” Nov. 3, page 8). Research strongly supports his position. Studies show that wide, self-selected reading is related to literacy, knowledge of the world and achievements: People who read more, read and write better, know more and accomplish more in life.
Creativity researcher Dean Keith Simonton has concluded that “omnivorous reading in childhood and adolescence correlates positively with ultimate adult success.”
Strong evidence comes from cases of highly successful well-read individuals with little formal education. Famous examples include Thomas Edison, who profited from reading books in his father’s home library as well as the Detroit public library, and Michael Faraday, who had the good luck to work for a bookbinder and became an enthusiastic reader.
School can encourage or discourage reading. An over-emphasis on testing — a disease that seems to have spread world-wide — inhibits intellectual development by not allowing time for students to develop their own interests by reading widely.
However, schools can help students by exposing them to different ideas, giving them time to explore their interests and providing access to a print-rich environment.
Stephen Krashen
Los Angeles, California
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS