Ma is different
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has complained that his proposed peace agreement with China has drawn criticism, whereas former presidents Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) and Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) were able to talk about the topic without such a backlash. Ma believe this double standard applies because he is a “Mainlander.”
However, if that were a big issue Ma would not have been elected president in 2008. The basic problem is his thinking and performance.
Ma’s father asked him to “dissolve independence and gradually achieve unification,” and Ma himself has declared a desire for “eventual unification.” He even named one of his daughters “Only China” (唯中) — nothing but China.
Ma thinks his peace proposal is exactly the camouflage he needs to pursue unification. His “golden decade” might mean unification in 10 years. He has completely forgotten his promise to not negotiate if China has missiles aimed at Taiwan.
There is a broad consensus in Taiwan that Ma is incompetent. Some people even call him a “Diarrhea Horse” or a poor performer. His lack of negotiating skills worries Taiwanese.
Ma loves Taiwan only when he runs for president. In the last election, he said he would be Taiwanese even after he was cremated. For next year’s election, he now says he is Taiwanese because his kin are buried in Taiwan.
Ma was acquitted of pocketing public money when he was Taipei City mayor. Chen has been jailed for years, ever since handing over power to Ma, and Lee is being indicted despite having left the presidential office 11 years ago. Ma is the only favorite son of the law.
When Wu Po-hsiung (吳伯雄) was Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman, Ma asked him to “divest the KMT of its assets,” but now that Ma is party chairman and president, he has decided to hold onto them for use in KMT campaigns. In contrast, Democratic Progressive Party Chairperson Tsai Ing-Wen (蔡英文) depends on small donations from the public.
Charles Hong
Columbus, Ohio
Getting it right
The other day I received a letter from a top corporate newspaper company in Texas, delivered to my local post office box, with a computerized address label that correctly spelled my name and box number, but ended with the words: “Chiayi, Taiwan, -Province of China.”
Now I’ve seen everything. My address was printed on corporate stationary and was part of an window envelope. When I wrote back and told the company in question that Taiwan is not part of China and certainly not a province of China, a secretary wrote back and apologized for the mistake. She blamed it on the corporate computer that uses a “one China” map of foreign countries that simply does not list Taiwan as a nation.
This is not an isolated incident. In fact, many corporate computer systems in the US are incorrectly set up to address mail to Taiwan as a “Province of China.”
It is not the fault of the US Postal Service, it is the fault of the UN and those private companies that use Beijing-licensed addressing equipment.
Dan Bloom
Chiayi
The power of reading
Lii Ding-tzann (李丁讚) says that reading in a way that connects to your own life can make a powerful contribution to an individual’s intellectual development (“Reading your way to true wisdom,” Nov. 3, page 8). Research strongly supports his position. Studies show that wide, self-selected reading is related to literacy, knowledge of the world and achievements: People who read more, read and write better, know more and accomplish more in life.
Creativity researcher Dean Keith Simonton has concluded that “omnivorous reading in childhood and adolescence correlates positively with ultimate adult success.”
Strong evidence comes from cases of highly successful well-read individuals with little formal education. Famous examples include Thomas Edison, who profited from reading books in his father’s home library as well as the Detroit public library, and Michael Faraday, who had the good luck to work for a bookbinder and became an enthusiastic reader.
School can encourage or discourage reading. An over-emphasis on testing — a disease that seems to have spread world-wide — inhibits intellectual development by not allowing time for students to develop their own interests by reading widely.
However, schools can help students by exposing them to different ideas, giving them time to explore their interests and providing access to a print-rich environment.
Stephen Krashen
Los Angeles, California
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
RSS