Nan Fang Shuo (南方朔), a well-known commentator and someone President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) called “big brother” as a child, recently published an article in the Hong Kong -Chinese-language Ming Pao Daily News. Will this article finally show Ma’s supporters in Hong Kong what he is really like?
In the article, Nan Fang Shuo says that because much of the Taiwanese media use polling data as a tool to influence voter behavior, he only trusts political polls conducted by Global Views Monthly magazine and National Chengchi University’s (NCCU) Center for Prediction Markets and its Exchange of Future Events. However, Global Views has been forced to stop polling and the NCCU polling center was shut down during last year’s elections for the five special municipalities at a time when tensions were at their highest. There is therefore good reason for concern over the coming months.
According to the most recent poll from NCCU, there was a sudden turnaround after Ma mentioned signing a peace accord with China, putting Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) in the lead by 0.1 percent on Oct. 19. However, the next day, when Ma proposed a referendum on the matter, he led Tsai by 0.4 percent. As of that Tuesday, Tsai had been ahead of Ma in four out of the past seven days and on Monday she was ahead by 0.8 percent.
If Tsai maintains her momentum, then the tide could turn decisively against Ma and Tsai’s lead will only widen further over the ensuing months.
Among the numerous factors at play, there are two key reasons for this sudden turnaround. First, Ma’s approach to the proposed peace accord and talks of a referendum on the matter has made many voters feel as though he is only trying to manipulate the outcome of the election and is therefore untrustworthy. Second, the public does not trust this “peace accord,” especially if Ma — who lacks both sincerity and a sense of identification with Taiwan — will be the one negotiating with the Chinese Communist Party.
Reporters from Hong Kong who have come to observe Taiwan’s elections have also discovered Ma’s manipulative side, which is why they recently asked Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) why Ma has failed to follow through on his initial announcement of the possible peace accord.
Wang has no way of knowing the answer to that, because Ma’s election strategy is in the hands of Ma himself and his campaign director, King Pu-tsung (金浦聰). He responded simply by saying it was “election talk.” Evidently, then, Ma is willing to use any means at his disposal to win the election, even manipulating the cross-strait issue on which Taiwan’s sovereignty rests.
Ma has two strategies for dealing with this situation. First, he is delegating the dirty work to his running mate, Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義), and his spokesperson, allowing them to spread fabrications about Tsai while he himself remains above the fray. His other strategy is to denigrate the hard-earned achievements of others in major ad campaigns.
At the same time, old military men and friends have been encouraged to play to people’s sympathies and stir up tension.
Taiwanese must let go of Ma’s fantasies and use their votes to seize control of their own destiny. Tsai has recently received greater support at campaign rallies and there has been a clear rise in anti-Ma sentiment since the DPP declared this month “little piggies month” — sparking a craze for piggy-bank donation boxes. If Tsai and the DPP can be scrupulous in their dealings with big bad wolf Ma, then his recent downturn in support will ultimately translate into victory for Tsai.
Paul Lin is a political commentator.
Translated by Kyle Jeffcoat
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS