Nan Fang Shuo (南方朔), a well-known commentator and someone President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) called “big brother” as a child, recently published an article in the Hong Kong -Chinese-language Ming Pao Daily News. Will this article finally show Ma’s supporters in Hong Kong what he is really like?
In the article, Nan Fang Shuo says that because much of the Taiwanese media use polling data as a tool to influence voter behavior, he only trusts political polls conducted by Global Views Monthly magazine and National Chengchi University’s (NCCU) Center for Prediction Markets and its Exchange of Future Events. However, Global Views has been forced to stop polling and the NCCU polling center was shut down during last year’s elections for the five special municipalities at a time when tensions were at their highest. There is therefore good reason for concern over the coming months.
According to the most recent poll from NCCU, there was a sudden turnaround after Ma mentioned signing a peace accord with China, putting Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) in the lead by 0.1 percent on Oct. 19. However, the next day, when Ma proposed a referendum on the matter, he led Tsai by 0.4 percent. As of that Tuesday, Tsai had been ahead of Ma in four out of the past seven days and on Monday she was ahead by 0.8 percent.
If Tsai maintains her momentum, then the tide could turn decisively against Ma and Tsai’s lead will only widen further over the ensuing months.
Among the numerous factors at play, there are two key reasons for this sudden turnaround. First, Ma’s approach to the proposed peace accord and talks of a referendum on the matter has made many voters feel as though he is only trying to manipulate the outcome of the election and is therefore untrustworthy. Second, the public does not trust this “peace accord,” especially if Ma — who lacks both sincerity and a sense of identification with Taiwan — will be the one negotiating with the Chinese Communist Party.
Reporters from Hong Kong who have come to observe Taiwan’s elections have also discovered Ma’s manipulative side, which is why they recently asked Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) why Ma has failed to follow through on his initial announcement of the possible peace accord.
Wang has no way of knowing the answer to that, because Ma’s election strategy is in the hands of Ma himself and his campaign director, King Pu-tsung (金浦聰). He responded simply by saying it was “election talk.” Evidently, then, Ma is willing to use any means at his disposal to win the election, even manipulating the cross-strait issue on which Taiwan’s sovereignty rests.
Ma has two strategies for dealing with this situation. First, he is delegating the dirty work to his running mate, Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義), and his spokesperson, allowing them to spread fabrications about Tsai while he himself remains above the fray. His other strategy is to denigrate the hard-earned achievements of others in major ad campaigns.
At the same time, old military men and friends have been encouraged to play to people’s sympathies and stir up tension.
Taiwanese must let go of Ma’s fantasies and use their votes to seize control of their own destiny. Tsai has recently received greater support at campaign rallies and there has been a clear rise in anti-Ma sentiment since the DPP declared this month “little piggies month” — sparking a craze for piggy-bank donation boxes. If Tsai and the DPP can be scrupulous in their dealings with big bad wolf Ma, then his recent downturn in support will ultimately translate into victory for Tsai.
Paul Lin is a political commentator.
Translated by Kyle Jeffcoat
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while