The ruling and opposition parties have been locked in heated debate about raising the monthly subsidy for elderly farmers.
The Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) proposal is to automatically adjust the allowance every four years based on consumer price index (CPI) growth. Eight kinds of welfare allowance — including one for senior citizens with low or medium incomes — are to be adjusted in the same way.
With a weak economy, a widening gap between rich and poor and a growing number of people falling into the low and middle-income brackets, no party is likely to oppose these new subsidy rules.
The question is, where will the money come from? The Ministry of Finance has said it expects tax revenues for this year to exceed its target by NT$50 billion (US$1.67 billion), but who can guarantee that this will happen again next year or the year after?
Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) says that the legislature will still have the discretion, as in the past, to authorize the Cabinet to adjust payments, but this is certain to create a crowding-out effect.
Government revenues in many countries, including Taiwan, are not enough to cover their expenditure. Governments run budget deficits year after year, and accumulated debt often exceeds their legally defined limits.
The governments of Europe’s weakest economies — known as the “PIGS” (Portugal, Italy, Ireland, Greece and Spain) — have had their sovereign credit ratings cut after accumulating vast amounts of debt.
The Greek government is teetering on the brink of bankruptcy, and eurozone governments have so far failed to come up with effective policies to thoroughly remedy the situation. Iceland and Ireland have also suffered debt crises and required bailouts.
In the US, the executive branch of government has clashed with the US Congress over the issue of raising the limit for government borrowing. This crisis led to a cut in the US sovereign credit rating, triggering panic around the world.
In this age of globalization, any sign of trouble in one country is immediately felt around the world. The series of global stock market crashes that have occurred over the past few months are cases in point.
A still more serious problem is that the global economy has not fully recovered from the 2008 financial crisis.
Many governments have been relying on loose monetary policies to stimulate consumption and rescue the financial sector. While such policies have led to soaring stock markets and real-estate prices, they have done little or nothing to help the real economy.
Income inequality means economic growth does not benefit the majority of people, and the unemployment rate remains stubbornly high. Taiwan is no exception. While some private companies have performed reasonably well, many firms in the electronics sector, which caters mainly to the European and North American markets, are struggling.
As for China, it may be headed for a hard landing, so relying on the Chinese market is sheer wishful thinking and ignores the hard realities. Taiwanese export orders in September rose just 1.72 percent from a year ago, representing the lowest annual increase in 23 months, and that should serve as a warning.
The government is talking about a “golden decade,” but it has not proposed any immediate measures to achieve this goal. Neither does this promise include any short, medium or long-term plan to resolve the government deficit and outstanding debt.
Anyone who has the slightest understanding of the composition of the Taiwanese government budget must be very anxious about public revenue and expenditure and the debt burden that we are passing on to future generations.
The nation’s total debt relative to GNP may not be high compared with many other countries, but there are many other figures that speak volumes about the state of the economy and the nation’s finances.
For instance, Taiwan’s tax burden stands at 12 percent of GNP, which is much lower than most countries. Keen not to lose votes during elections, the government does not dare to reform the taxation system. If labor insurance arrears, local government deficits and the operating fund debt are taken into account, the nation’s fiscal outlook is rather bleak.
No government can call itself responsible if it ignores and avoids problems. While it is hard to tap new sources of revenue, the government can start by cutting expenditure.
Having served as head of the Research, Development and Evaluation Commission for a number of years, I know that government ministries and departments have plenty of room for cutting costs.
If the government that results from next year’s elections cannot find any new sources of revenue, it should set about cutting expenditure without delay.
Lin Chia-cheng teaches at Soochow University and is a former head of the Research, Development and Evaluation Commission.
Translated by Julian Clegg
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS