Council for Cultural Affairs Minister Emile Sheng (盛治仁) has been doing some fancy footwork this week amid a barrage of complaints about the cost and bidding process for a rock musical to celebrate the Republic of China’s (ROC) centennial. Although Sheng doubles as chief executive of the centennial organizing committee, he is not the only one who should be raked over the coals for the gargantuan and wasteful budgets of centennial events.
Vice President Vincent Siew (蕭萬長) serves as chairman of the ROC Centennial Foundation and Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) is its vice chairman. Both men were fulsome in their praise for Dreamers (夢想家) at a press conference in August to launch the ticket sales for the show.
Wang declared that the “rock musical will fully manifest the country’s soft power in the performing arts.”
Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers have complained about the show’s NT$215 million (US$7.15 million) price tag and how Performance Workshop Theatre founder Stan Lai (賴聲川) and his team once again ended up with a large portion of the budget — after winning contracts for the 2009 Deaflympics and other events Sheng has been involved in.
It is hard to quibble with the choice of Lai; he is Taiwan’s best-known theater director and playwright and his productions are legendary. If you wanted the best, Lai would certainly top the list of nominees. However, the DPP lawmakers have raised valid questions about the bidding process, although they risk targeting a few trees, while overlooking the forest.
What one can and should complain about is the excessive cost of Dreamers and so many other centennial projects. Spending NT$215 million on a musical that was only going to run two nights is insane. At NT$100 a seat, ticket revenues probably did not even cover the costume budget.
Then there was the NT$200 million spent on Chinese artist Cai Guoqiang’s (蔡國強) fireworks display at Dajia Riverside Park in Taipei on New Year’s Eve, which helped launch the centennial celebrations.
Next Saturday is the foundation’s four-hour “I Dreamed A Dream 100 Concert” (聽見未來.夢想一百) at Kaohsiung National Stadium. Billed as the “largest Mando-pop concert in history,” its price tag has been put at about NT$50 million.
The stadium can hold 40,000 people and the show will be broadcast on TVBS the next day. Tickets are priced at between NT$250 and NT$1,250 — hopefully TVBS is paying for the broadcast rights — but again, it is hard to see how the show’s costs will be covered.
Then there was the fuss in March last year over the official slogan for the centennial celebrations, with complaints the slogan had been watered down from “Republic of China, Founded 100 Years” (中華民國,建國一百) to “Republic of China, Splendid 100” (中華民國,精彩一百). While politicians fumed over the wording, their time would have been better spent wondering how much money the foundation was spending to come up with such an insipid slogan, since Sheng said that meetings had been held with more than 100 experts, designers and artists.
The ROC Centennial Web site lists more than 75 activities stretching back to Jan. 1 last year and running through Dec. 31 this year around the nation and the world, including exhibitions, seminars, festivals, performances, as well as the Sunrise LPGA Taiwan Championship. How much have each of them cost?
Complaints about the spending on these programs is now coming fast, loud and far too late. The money has already been spent. Where were the politicians and academics when the budgets for all these events were being allocated? They deserve some of the opprobrium.
Legislative hindsight does little good in the long run, especially since politicians from all sides have a hard time remembering their lessons from one year to the next.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not