The social, environmental and financial risks of climate change are well-known.
However, although it is important that we remain focused on tackling these, we must also respond rapidly to the opportunities they present. The transition to a low-carbon, resource-efficient economy is rightly making everyone reconsider the way we generate, transport and consume energy.
While other countries are still deliberating over carbon commitments, the UK has embraced the economy-wide opportunity. Earlier this year, the UK government published a new Carbon Plan setting out what has to happen and by when if the UK is to live up to its green ambitions, meet domestic carbon targets and encourage greater action internationally. This focuses on the jobs and economic opportunities of the low carbon economy and on policies that will help insulate Britain from future energy price shocks.
This Carbon Plan sets out a vision of a changed Britain, powered by cleaner energy used more efficiently in homes and businesses, with more secure energy supplies and more stable energy prices that will benefit from the jobs and growth that a low-carbon economy will bring.
However, as humanity moves toward creating a low-carbon world, we need to look beyond government solutions. The business community will be instrumental in shaping how the new “green” economy operates.
Businesses have the power to implement real, substantive and swift change and to enjoy the benefits of the rise of the green economy. This is particularly important given the global challenge of recovering from the global economic crisis. From software to agriculture and from manufacturing to transport, the UK is already mainstreaming new ways of thinking and new ways of working that seek to make businesses more energy and resource efficient.
Taiwanese business leaders are increasingly seeing climate change as one of their top concerns and businesses are now taking a hard look at their environmental impact. While corporate responsibility is a factor, the economic facts mean that business models cannot afford to ignore the green trend. Globally, the low-carbon and environmental goods and services sector already involves 1.4 million companies and over 28 million employees. The sector continues to grow despite the global downturn, and is forecast to grow by around 4 percent per year over the next five years.
Economies which invest in renewable energy reduce their dependency on imported oil, coal and gas, making them less vulnerable to global shocks.
The UK is an emerging international hub for low-carbon expertise and innovation, helping businesses across the world shift to a low-carbon future through smarter, sustainable solutions, making it an ideal investment location for low-carbon companies wanting to grow their business internationally. In every industry, the UK is demonstrating world-class capabilities in low-carbon, energy and resource efficiency — from the largest offshore wind capacity to cutting-edge marine energy technologies.
With a strong spirit of innovation and entrepreneurialism, the UK is ideally placed to prosper in this new world. Taiwanese companies, too, are developing technologies to help us use resources more efficiently. There is scope for partnership here as the UK and Taiwan both move quickly to low-carbon economies. The transition presents great opportunities to those economies able to seize them.
Investing time and money in low-carbon technology makes good business sense. With concerted effort, I am confident that even more can be achieved in partnerships between Taiwan and British companies.
David Campbell is Director of the British Trade and Cultural Office.
The world has become less predictable, less rules-based, and more shaped by the impulses of strongmen and short-term dealmaking. Nowhere is this more consequential than in East Asia, where the fate of democratic Taiwan hinges on how global powers manage — or mismanage — tensions with an increasingly assertive China. The return of Donald Trump to the White House has deepened the global uncertainty, with his erratic, highly personalized foreign-policy approach unsettling allies and adversaries alike. Trump appears to treat foreign policy like a reality show. Yet, paradoxically, the global unpredictability may offer Taiwan unexpected deterrence. For China, the risk of provoking the
Eating at a breakfast shop the other day, I turned to an old man sitting at the table next to mine. “Hey, did you hear that the Legislative Yuan passed a bill to give everyone NT$10,000 [US$340]?” I said, pointing to a newspaper headline. The old man cursed, then said: “Yeah, the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT] canceled the NT$100 billion subsidy for Taiwan Power Co and announced they would give everyone NT$10,000 instead. “Nice. Now they are saying that if electricity prices go up, we can just use that cash to pay for it,” he said. “I have no time for drivel like
Young supporters of former Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) were detained for posting the names and photographs of judges and prosecutors believed to be overseeing the Core Pacific City redevelopment corruption case. The supporters should be held responsible for their actions. As for Ko’s successor, TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌), he should reflect on whether his own comments are provocative and whether his statements might be misunderstood. Huang needs to apologize to the public and the judiciary. In the article, “Why does sorry seem to be the hardest word?” the late political commentator Nan Fang Shuo (南方朔) wrote
Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) reportedly told the EU’s top diplomat that China does not want Russia to lose in Ukraine, because the US could shift its focus to countering Beijing. Wang made the comment while meeting with EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Kaja Kallas on July 2 at the 13th China-EU High-Level Strategic Dialogue in Brussels, the South China Morning Post and CNN reported. Although contrary to China’s claim of neutrality in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, such a frank remark suggests Beijing might prefer a protracted war to keep the US from focusing on
RSS