It has taken almost half a decade, but the area in Taipei now known as Huashan 1914 Creative Park appears to be well on its way to being the crucible for the performing, creative and experimental arts that so many have long envisioned.
It is not quite there yet, and it may be more commercial and regimented than some artists like, but the park has obviously struck the right tone with Taipei residents and tourists, as a visit on almost any weekend, and even some weeknights, will attest.
The site started life as the Taipei Winery in 1916. Ownership then passed to the Taiwan Tobacco and Wine Monopoly Bureau after the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) took over Taiwan. In 1987, the winery relocated and its buildings sat boarded up and deserted for a decade as developers salivated over the property and the central government debated what to do, having originally earmarked the site for a new Legislative Yuan.
Who knows how long the buildings would have sat derelict — or if they would have survived — if the Golden Bough Theatre had not staged an intervention of sorts by taking over one of the buildings to stage the play Trojans amid demands that the government allow idle buildings and sites to be used for cultural activities. The police broke up the show and the government accused the group of illegally appropriating state property, but the stage was set for change.
Two years of protests, lobbying and petitions, led by artist Tang Huang-chen (湯皇珍) and others who squatted at the site, followed before the government decided to turn the former winery over to the Council for Cultural Affairs to administer.
Management of the area, now renamed the Huashan Arts District, was given to Tang and other artists, who formed the Association of Cultural and Environmental Reform in Taiwan (ACERT), which ran it for the next five years. Changes at the top of the council led to changes in the vision for the park, which officialdom avowed had nothing to do with the politically driven scandal that erupted over an outdoor drumming circle in June 2002 that created media hysteria and headlines that Huashan had become a haven for substance abuse and demands the site be closed down and redeveloped.
Not everyone was convinced by the denials and there definitely was a difference between the artistic visionaries — who preferred to focus on experimental and avant-garde works — and bureaucratic ambitions about the district’s direction. When the management contract was put up for bidding in late 2003, ACERT did not participate and L’Orangerie International Art Consultants won a one-year contract.
In 2005, Huashan was shuttered by the council for a multibillion New Taiwan dollar renovation and did not reopen again until mid-2007, under the name Huashan Culture Park and the management of the Taiwan Cultural-Creative Development Co, which had been given a 15-year deal.
While debate continues about who should be in the park and what types of events should be held there, a happy compromise appears to have been found since then between commercial ventures — an art gallery, yoga clothing store, restaurants and live concert venue — and small trade shows and exhibitions, such the Taiwan Designers Week, as well as the less commercial, with performance and rehearsal spaces given over to small and mid-sized dance and theater troupes and musicians. Weekends also find a thriving flea market for young designers and entrepreneurs.
The mix is fluid, sometimes even chaotic, but that is the charm and attraction of Huashan as visitors can continue to be surprised by what they find there. Taiwan Cultural-Creative Development Co should recognize that fluidity can be a good thing and not tinker too much with the balance between commercial and creative space as it continues to renovate and upgrade the park’s facilities.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS