Extending a helping hand
I read your article “Teenager with rare disease pleads for financial help” (Sept. 22, page 2) with interest.
It seems to me quite shocking that a modern, relatively affluent place like Taiwan, with a heavily subsidized national health service can sit back and let such things happen. Surely, the purpose of having a national health service is to provide social healthcare for all, regardless of illness or condition, with additional funding (where necessary) from the government. In the UK, where I am from, the government provides a National Health Service for all and, while it may not be the most perfect social health system in the world and waiting lists can be woefully long, doctors do subscribe to the Hippocratic oath and treat and care for all illnesses and disorders, whatever these may be.
I felt rather sad to read that a 17-year-old girl, who should be happy and excited at being on the cusp of adulthood and planning which university to attend, is being forced, in an “advanced” place such as Taiwan, to practically get down on her knees and beg for help from the public. But, let’s be honest here, the average take-home salary in Taiwan is approximately NT$30,000 (according to InvesTaiwan), so some benign benefactor coming along and offering the full amount on a monthly basis, when many are themselves struggling for survival, strikes me as being rather unlikely.
Which is where I confess to being a little bit ashamed of the Taipei Times. The foreign community (at least the long-term, professional expatriate community) is highly affluent and generally earns the equivalent of what they would earn in their home countries (if not more, because of lower taxes). With the cost of living being low and earning what, compared with the average salary here, is a very high salary, I would bet that most expatriates are actually better off than in their home countries, let alone in comparison with the Taiwanese population. I know I am.
So, it seems a little odd to me that the Taipei Times, a fairly important provider of news to the expatriate community, deemed this story important enough to carry, but completely failed to offer any information on how concerned members of the public can help support this poor young girl.
I mentioned this story to my partner, who said that in the local (Chinese-language) online press, articles have indeed provided details of the bank account that donations should be paid into for people wanting to help this girl get treatment. It beggars belief that similar information is not offered in the Taipei Times. If your paper would print or place the details online with the article, I’m confident that members of the foreign community would want to donate and before long, this girl would have more than enough money monthly for her treatment and other costs.
If that would not serve as a shining example of how the foreign community (including myself) can help people in need in Taiwan, then I am not really sure what would.
ADAM SHRIMPTON
Taipei
Editor’s note: For more information, please contact Hu Mao-lin (胡茂林), head of administration at Hujiang High School (滬江高中), 02-8663-1122, ext. 221. Donations can be sent to First Bank, Jingmei Branch, account no. 10668028186, account name Hsu Wei-ting (第一銀行, 景美分行, 帳戶: 10668028186, 戶名: 徐薇婷)
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
Immediately after the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) “Justice Mission” exercise at the end of last year, a question was posed to Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal regarding recent developments involving the exercises around Taiwan, and how he viewed their impact on regional peace and stability. His answer was somewhat perplexing to me as a curious student of Taiwanese affairs. “India closely follows developments across the Indo-Pacific region,” he said, adding: “We have an abiding interest in peace and stability in the region, in view of our significant trade, economic, people-to-people, and maritime interests. We urge all concerned
International debate on Taiwan is obsessed with “invasion countdowns,” framing the cross-strait crisis as a matter of military timetables and political opportunity. However, the seismic political tremors surrounding Central Military Commission (CMC) vice chairman Zhang Youxia (張又俠) suggested that Washington and Taipei are watching the wrong clock. Beijing is constrained not by a lack of capability, but by an acute fear of regime-threatening military failure. The reported sidelining of Zhang — a combat veteran in a largely unbloodied force and long-time loyalist of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — followed a year of purges within the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA)
RSS