Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas has announced that he will today submit an application to the UN for Palestine to become an official member of the world organization.
Many countries in the international community are expected to look favorably on this development, although both Israel and the US have raised objections. The US has already confirmed that it will veto the motion, saying that such an application is premature.
Palestinians have lived under Israeli occupation for decades, but they have never given up the dream of one day having their own state. In 1988, the Palestine Liberation Organization’s National Council even went as far as to unilaterally declare independence for Palestine from its place of exile in Algiers.
However, it was only after the Oslo Accords in 1993 that Palestinians gained the right to establish a government within the occupied territories, with Israel agreeing to the eventual creation of their own state.
Over the past few years the Israeli stance on Palestine has hardened and the US has maintained that the creation of a Palestinian state can only be achieved through negotiations with Israel.
Abbas’ announcement of a formal application for UN membership shows that the Palestinians have lost patience with political negotiations that have turned out to be completely pointless. His hope is that this new strategy will force the international community to recognize the autonomy and independence of Palestine as fact.
Even if Abbas is finally forced by the US to retract the application, the Palestinians still have the option of applying to have their current “observer entity” status changed to “observer nation” status.
Given that more than 100 countries officially recognize the State of Palestine, the likelihood of such a motion being passed by the UN General Assembly is quite high. If Abbas does eventually bow to US pressure and retract the application, the Palestinians can play this chip to restart talks with the Israelis, this time with more sympathy for their cause from the international community.
One has to say that the Palestinians have played their hand, from a position of weakness, pretty well.
We can compare their experience to that of Taiwan. Since President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) came to power in 2008, the government has pursued a “diplomatic truce” with China, which has included the cessation of all efforts on the part of Taiwan to join the UN.
As a result of this strategy, China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a diplomatic white paper published last month that Taiwan refraining from applying to join the UN for two years in a row should be considered a diplomatic achievement.
Diplomacy is all about power and strategy. Palestine’s application for UN membership has made the world sit up and pay attention to the way in which its leaders have bravely stood up to foreign powers. It is also a demonstration of the limitless possibilities of diplomatic maneuvering. In contrast, our government’s diplomatic truce, and ceding of any advantage, pales in comparison.
Chen Mu-min is an assistant professor at National Chung Hsing University’s Graduate Institute of Politics.
Translated By Paul Cooper
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS