Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas has announced that he will today submit an application to the UN for Palestine to become an official member of the world organization.
Many countries in the international community are expected to look favorably on this development, although both Israel and the US have raised objections. The US has already confirmed that it will veto the motion, saying that such an application is premature.
Palestinians have lived under Israeli occupation for decades, but they have never given up the dream of one day having their own state. In 1988, the Palestine Liberation Organization’s National Council even went as far as to unilaterally declare independence for Palestine from its place of exile in Algiers.
However, it was only after the Oslo Accords in 1993 that Palestinians gained the right to establish a government within the occupied territories, with Israel agreeing to the eventual creation of their own state.
Over the past few years the Israeli stance on Palestine has hardened and the US has maintained that the creation of a Palestinian state can only be achieved through negotiations with Israel.
Abbas’ announcement of a formal application for UN membership shows that the Palestinians have lost patience with political negotiations that have turned out to be completely pointless. His hope is that this new strategy will force the international community to recognize the autonomy and independence of Palestine as fact.
Even if Abbas is finally forced by the US to retract the application, the Palestinians still have the option of applying to have their current “observer entity” status changed to “observer nation” status.
Given that more than 100 countries officially recognize the State of Palestine, the likelihood of such a motion being passed by the UN General Assembly is quite high. If Abbas does eventually bow to US pressure and retract the application, the Palestinians can play this chip to restart talks with the Israelis, this time with more sympathy for their cause from the international community.
One has to say that the Palestinians have played their hand, from a position of weakness, pretty well.
We can compare their experience to that of Taiwan. Since President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) came to power in 2008, the government has pursued a “diplomatic truce” with China, which has included the cessation of all efforts on the part of Taiwan to join the UN.
As a result of this strategy, China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a diplomatic white paper published last month that Taiwan refraining from applying to join the UN for two years in a row should be considered a diplomatic achievement.
Diplomacy is all about power and strategy. Palestine’s application for UN membership has made the world sit up and pay attention to the way in which its leaders have bravely stood up to foreign powers. It is also a demonstration of the limitless possibilities of diplomatic maneuvering. In contrast, our government’s diplomatic truce, and ceding of any advantage, pales in comparison.
Chen Mu-min is an assistant professor at National Chung Hsing University’s Graduate Institute of Politics.
Translated By Paul Cooper
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS