Is Taiwan’s decrepit air force planning to ask the US to retrofit it with a smokescreen? It must be, given sudden comments by Deputy Minister of National Defense Andrew Yang (楊念祖) in Richmond, Virginia, on Sunday, that Taiwan would welcome discussions about acquiring sophisticated F-35s from the US.
Floating the idea that Taiwan might buy F-35s at some point in the future was apparently Yang’s way of numbing the pain of the then-pending, and now definite US decision not to sell Taiwan F-16C/Ds, jets the air force needs if it wants to still call itself an air force in 10 years.
However, this ruse is highly disingenuous. There is no way Taiwan will ever get F-35s from the US. Other than the F-22 Raptors, which the US has discontinued and never exported, the F-35 is the US’ most advanced fighter jet. It is to the F-16 what a Formula 1 car is to a Porsche. In addition, the F-35 line has been plagued with problems — cost overruns, late shipments, design problems, you name it.
US President Barack Obama’s administration isn’t even willing to sell Taiwan F-16C/Ds, that went into production in the early 1980s, before that line is closed forever in the not too distant future. What on earth makes Yang think the US will sell Taiwan F-35s?
How long does Yang think it would take to negotiate an F-35 deal? The F-16C/D went into production in 1984, following the success of the F-16A/B program, which began in 1976. Taiwan has only just now — in September 2011 — gotten the final decision on negotiations to acquire those jets. That’s almost three decades just to be told: “No.”
The F-35 took its maiden flight in 2006. If we project the same time to negotiate an F-35 deal that it took Taiwan to negotiate the unsuccessful F-16C/D deal from the beginning of production, then the US will be refusing to sell F-35s to Taipei in about 2041.
It does not take a genius to figure out how advanced China’s air force will be at that point. How many generations of stealth fighters will they produce over the next three decades? Will their navy already have credible aircraft carrier battle groups by then? Probably.
Why then even bother suggesting that Taiwan might be interested in negotiating an F-35 deal? Yang might as well have said that Taiwan would try to convince the US to re-open its multibillion-dollar F-22 Raptor line, and then sell the world’s most advanced jet to Taiwan despite US legislation prohibiting Raptor exports.
The dismal truth is that Taiwan will have to make do with upgrades to its F-16A/Bs, and maybe not even upgrades to all of them. It will be forced to patrol the Taiwan Strait with jalopies while Chinese pilots zip around in Ferraris.
Suggesting that Taiwan’s air force could buy F-35s is like a school principal telling parents he could not afford to replace aging black-fume-burping gas--guzzler school buses with fuel-efficient minibuses, but would apply at some time in the future to acquire a fleet of sleek BMWs that would pick up each and every student at his or her home.
Keep dreaming, Yang.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS