Top jewelry executive Erwin Huang (黃岳永) is a respected power broker in Hong Kong’s business community, but he scored a failing grade when it came to garbage collection.
The 46-year-old got a hard lesson in low-paid work as part of a hit television show that turns some of the financial hub’s wealthiest business titans into its poorest laborers for a few days — sparking a ratings bonanza.
Donning a mask, apron and rubber gloves, Huang nearly passed out from the rotting stench of trash he was tasked with dumping and threatened to quit his temporary job after just a few hours.
“It’s very stinky ... I need some fresh air. I can’t take it anymore,” Huang, who received about US$6 dollars a day, complained to his unimpressed supervisor.
“Look at my hands, they are swollen. It’s because of the dirty water. This is very hard. I’m dizzy, I need some time to rest,” he groaned, taking repeated rest breaks.
Huang’s hapless performance aired on The Battle of the Poor Rich, which has soared in popularity since its 2009 debut.
Some of Hong Kong’s mega-rich have appeared on the show as janitors and sweepers, scrambling for their next meal while sleeping in the territory’s infamous cage homes — tiny cubicles that rent for about US$200 a month.
The wealthy volunteers are taking part in the reality show — which highlights the plight of the territory’s poor — to experience another side of life while hoping to boost their flagging public image.
Huang, then-chief executive of Tse Sui Luen Jewellery, found his small quarters too much to bear in Hong Kong’s stifling heat, so he opted to sleep on the street instead. Adding insult to injury, Huang’s female superior gave him a failing grade, noting that his slack effort caused them to miss the rubbish truck.
“I know some people think it’s funny seeing these millionaires sweep the floor,” said Doris Wong (王祿霞), the show’s executive producer, adding that the gimmicky style “draws audiences.”
The show’s weekly ratings have soared from about 64,000 during the first season to 1.2 million viewers in the second season, or about 17 percent of Hong Kong’s 7 million residents.
The territory is usually associated with laissez-faire economic policies and super-rich tycoons, including its wealthiest man Li Ka-shing (李嘉誠), a household name who has been dubbed “Superman” for his business prowess.
However, a rising tide of anger has emerged in recent years as poor and middle-class residents struggle to afford homes amid soaring property prices.
Now, the once-admired tycoons are more often vilified, including Li and his vast property holdings. Hong Kong’s wage gap is one of the developed world’s largest, while the territory’s millionaire ranks grew about 33 percent last year.
For Hong Kong financier Johnny Chan (陳光明), collecting cardboard was an “eye opening and humbling experience,” far from his lucrative job in Hong Kong’s glitzy financial district.
“When I was on the show, I felt so empty and scared — it was hard living as a cardboard collector,” the 39-year-old father of three said.
“I hope I was able to shine some light on this problem. Society needs to help the poor collectively — the government, media, citizens,” he added.
Although dozens of the territory’s wealthy have forsaken their luxurious lifestyles and Brooks Brothers suits to live in poverty, the show’s producer said it’s tough to find new takers.
“Some of them feared that they will be seen as hypocrites — of doing this show instead of really wanting to help,” Wong said, adding that one person deliberated for two years before agreeing to appear on the show.
“Many rich people have turned us down, saying they don’t know how the public will react,” she added.
Michael Tien (田北辰), a local politician and owner of popular clothing chain G2000, said his time sweeping the territory’s streets “wasn’t tough at all,” but he admitted getting lost taking public transport — he usually has a chauffeur.
“As a prominent figure in Hong Kong, I think it is important to be seen out and about, seeing the world rather than sitting behind a desk,” he said. “As a politician, you can’t afford to be out of touch with your people.”
Tien started his street-sweeping duties at the crack of dawn and earned just enough to buy pre-packaged meals at convenience stores.
“Society’s view of me has changed,” he said. “People on the street have come up to me and thanked me for caring about them ... I’m a much happier person after the show,” Tien added.
Critics cast doubt on whether anyone can understand living in poverty after just a few days, while participants are quick to defend the territory’s elite.
“A lot of wealthier sectors of society actually do a lot for the poor,” Chan said, citing a new charitable fund started by Li. “It’s just that a lot of them don’t publicize it and have a film crew following them around.”
Accusing the territory’s rich of exploiting the poor is “very unfortunate,” he added.
“It is not necessary to demonize us. We keep the economy going and we employ people ... The burden of helping the poor does not fall on the rich,” Chan said.
Still, the show’s executive producer points to signs that the territory’s wealthy are reaching out to the poor more than ever before.
Chan said he has been making more donations and visiting the elderly since his appearance, while Tien said he has called on the territory’s railway system to offer discounts to low-income passengers.
Local reports earlier this year chronicled a masked — and still unidentified — woman handing out money in Hong Kong’s poorest districts.
“We are laying seeds for change,” Wong said. “Hopefully we are changing the mindsets of one rich person at a time.”
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
When a recall campaign targeting the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators was launched, something rather disturbing happened. According to reports, Hualien County Government officials visited several people to verify their signatures. Local authorities allegedly used routine or harmless reasons as an excuse to enter people’s house for investigation. The KMT launched its own recall campaigns, targeting Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers, and began to collect signatures. It has been found that some of the KMT-headed counties and cities have allegedly been mobilizing municipal machinery. In Keelung, the director of the Department of Civil Affairs used the household registration system