When the prime minister of Egypt stepped down last Thursday, Shereen Diaa, 32, was cooking lunch for her two young sons in a suburb on Cairo’s outskirts. A veiled woman who molds her life around her children, Diaa had promised herself she would stop attending political protests and focus on her boys, ages six and eight. However, when she saw on Facebook that the new prime minister himself would address the protesters the next day in an unprecedented act, she could not resist.
“I will leave you only two hours,” she said she told the children, dropping them off with her mother and then heading downtown to Tahrir Square.
In the raucous crowd, she stepped on a water jug to catch a glimpse of Egyptian Prime Minister Essam Sharaf, who had stood with the demonstrators before Hosni Mubarak was ousted as president.
“I see him! I am really happy!” she exclaimed, beaming, one voice among thousands.
“Raise your head high, you are Egyptian!” they chanted.
Egypt’s popular revolution was the work of men and women, bringing together housewives and fruit sellers, businesswomen and students. At its height, roughly one-quarter of the million protesters who poured into the square each day were women. Veiled and unveiled women shouted, fought and slept in the streets alongside men, upending traditional -expectations of their behavior.
The challenge now, activists say, is to make sure that women maintain their involvement as the nation lurches forward, so that their contribution to the revolution is not forgotten.
“Things have not changed, they are changing,” said Mozn Hassan, 32, executive director of the organization Nazra for Feminist Studies.
She barely returned home during the 18 days it took to topple Mubarak, but that is not enough, she said.
“Revolution is not about 18 days in Tahrir Square and then turning it into a carnival and loving the army,” she said. “We have simply won the first phase.”
It is an indication of the place of women in Egypt that Hassan was referring to the need for political gains and true equality, rather than some more basic rights denied to women in parts of the Arab world. Even as this country has become more devout, experts say roughly 25 percent of Egyptian women work outside their homes. And they are allowed to mix more freely in public with men than in some other Arab countries.
However, a recent report by the World Economic Forum ranked Egypt 125th out of 134 countries when judging equality between men and women, in good part because so many women do not work, 42 percent of women cannot read or write and almost no women are political leaders. (Last year, only eight of the 454 seats in parliament were held by women.)
Female circumcision is still widely practiced in Egypt, especially in rural areas. Women also suffer a level of sexual harassment that would not be tolerated in many countries. Women are often verbally harassed on the street in Cairo and sometimes groped in crowded spaces whether they are veiled or not, leading many wealthier women to simply abandon walking downtown.
Egypt is a step ahead of other popular uprisings in the region, which have had similar bursts of female participation, accompanied by a recognition from men that their support is vital. In Bahrain, hundreds of women wrapped in traditional black tunics stood up to the authorities in the demonstrations against the government, but in a nod to their conservative culture, they slept and prayed outside during protests in a roped-off women’s section. In Yemen, only in the past few days have significant numbers of women started to protest in Sana’a, the capital, but their numbers were dwarfed by the crowds of men.
Diaa, whose husband works for a multinational corporation, said the role of housewives in Egypt’s revolution has been critical because they often have more time to protest than their husbands. The importance of wives has long been clear to the Muslim Brotherhood; women are active in the charitable groups that form the organization’s backbone.
“We feel this is our country now,” said Abrar Mousad, 15, a Brotherhood supporter who stood in the square with her mother, aunt and cousin.
They had come from the northern city of Tanta to take part.
“Everything has changed. I can say what I think and what I need without any fear from anyone,” Mousad said.
That assessment may be overly optimistic.
Feminists acknowledge that the battle for equality will not be easy. Still, women here are energized and say perhaps the greatest change so far has been internal. They came to be convinced that the traffic-choked streets of downtown Cairo, long a male-dominated space, could be equally theirs despite years of rampant sexual harassment.
A study in 2008 by the Egyptian Center for Women’s Rights found that a vast majority of the women surveyed had been harassed. And the harassers, who are often members of the state security forces, are almost never punished, organization director Nehad Abu El Komsan said.
Komsan placed blame for the problem on the lack of laws protecting women against sexual violence, women’s fear of reporting trouble and a powerful undercurrent of oppression and frustration in Egyptian society, particularly among the millions of poor, uneducated and unemployed young men. However, during the revolution, women faced snipers and tear gas on those same streets, and they interacted with men they had been told to avoid.
“The same men they were afraid to talk to in the streets were saying, ‘Bravo, the girls’ revolution,’” Hassan said.
It did not take long, however, before the sense of unity that had grown in Tahrir Square was interrupted. On Feb. 11, just as Mubarak fell, the crowd suddenly swelled, crushing people against one another.
It was shortly afterward that CBS correspondent Lara Logan was sexually assaulted; the details of the attack remain unclear. Several Egyptian women also reported being groped and harassed.
Komsan and other women said they believed that the violence, which had been absent during the revolution itself, was the work of outsiders or young men who treated the night as they would a victorious soccer match, which are notorious for harassment.
However, it was still a reminder of how far Egypt has to go to address one of its most disturbing social problems.
“I was so disappointed,” said Yasmeen Mekawy, 25, an -Egyptian-American who had been surprised that she faced no harassment during the revolution, but who was grabbed from behind the Friday after Mubarak was driven from power.
There have been disappointments outside the square, too. The committee of eight legal experts appointed by the military authorities to revise the Constitution did not include a single woman or, according to Amal abd al-Hadi, a longtime feminist, anyone with a gender-sensitive perspective.
As a result, one proposed revision states that the Egyptian president may not be married to a “non-Egyptian woman” — seemingly ruling out the possibility of a woman as president.
A coalition of 63 women’s groups started a petition to include a female lawyer on the committee, arguing that women “have the right to participate in building the new Egyptian state.” Al-Hadi noted that in past Egyptian revolutions, in 1919 and 1952, women’s contributions had been met with similar setbacks. One of the feminists’ worst fears is that expected revisions in the country’s laws will erode the rights they do have, especially if conservative Islamic forces play a greater role in government.
However, many women also note progress. Last Friday, some of the many young women in Tahrir Square wore unofficial police headbands and held up signs reminding men to respect women. Outside the square, the deep suspicion that had separated secular feminists from Islamic feminists, who believe Islam should be the paradigm for women’s rights, is being bridged, said Fatma Eman, 28, an Islamic feminist who is a co-founder of Nazra.
“After the revolution, I was welcomed in a very decent way,” she said. “They needed something to prove that we were allies.”
A coalition including Nawal el-Saadawi, a leading feminist, planned a million women’s march yesterday to promote democracy. Diaa said she planned to stay home now to give the new prime minister a chance to work and to help her children, but added that she would return to the streets if Sharaf did not quickly make democratic changes.
“I don’t see a difference between men and women,” she said, talking about her many days of protesting. “The only difference is that men are more able to take the sticks of the thugs. But that doesn’t mean we don’t have a voice. I believe that I have a voice, so I can’t stay at home. I have a responsibility. I can be one of a million.”
ADDITIONAL REPORTING BY LAURA KASINOF AND ANDREA BRUCE
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS