The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has lost another two seats — by a substantial number of votes — in two southern by-elections. This result was hardly surprising. In the three years since the party regained control of the national government, it has managed to win just three of the 13 seats contested during by-elections. In contrast, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) have taken nine, and even though it fell slightly short of the KMT in the number of seats gained in last year’s special municipality elections, it won the popular vote by about 400,000 votes. So it comes as no surprise after the results of the latest southern by-election that DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) can say, with some assurance, that the DPP is on the right track to return to power.
The KMT has been hemorrhaging votes in local elections despite having a full majority on the national level. After every defeat, the reports to the party’s Central Standing Committee neither offer ideas about where the party is going wrong nor acknowledge the party’s inability to stop the rot.
The KMT sent in the heavyweights for the Greater Tainan legislative by-election, nominating Legislator-at-large Chen Shu-huei (陳淑慧), who remains a legislator despite having lost. Chen is able to be a legislator-at-large because she is married to former KMT legislator Lin Nan-sheng (林南生), who had relied on votes from local factions and veterans, but was controversial within the party itself, being on record for defying the party whip on two occasions when former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) was in power.
In Greater Kaohsiung, the KMT nominated Hsu -Ching-huang (徐慶煌), son of former DPP legislator Hsu Chih-ming (徐志明), despite controversy involving his family and his substantial defeat in the previous legislative election. Once again, the son’s defeat came as no surprise.
Luck had nothing to do with the victory of DPP candidate Lin Tai-hua (林岱樺). A former legislator, she lost her seat in a surprise electoral defeat, going on to contest the position of Kaohisung County commissioner. The support base she had built up during these elections helped her in this by-election after Kaohsiung city and county merged to become Greater Kaohsiung.
In Greater Tainan, the DPP fielded former Tainan mayor Hsu Tain-tsair (許添財). A former mayor contesting a legislative by-election was a relative shoo-in. The DPP was in a far better position for these by-elections than the KMT, both in its choice of candidates and its preparedness.
Public trust in the central government would help alleviate the KMT’s problems at the local level. However, the government’s high approval ratings dropped after only a year in power. In addition, people in the south receive few of the benefits of the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) and the region receives very few Chinese tourists.
Instead, southerners see job opportunities move to other areas and watch their products lose market share to products made in China. If we add rising commodity prices, stagnant or falling salaries and a government incapable of alleviating the pressures on the public and resuscitating the slowing regional economy, it is easy to understand why public disaffection is on the rise. The central government clearly bears much of the responsibility for the KMT’s losses in the south.
While President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is focusing on his re-election bid, the KMT continues to lose momentum. The party does not listen to public opinion or try to improve its governance. Instead, it plans to combine the presidential and legislative elections to suppress the DPP, ignoring the fact that this would prolong political paralysis resulting from an extension of the outgoing president’s lame duck period.
This ignores deeper problems and is constitutionally unsound. Such shortsighted manipulation is unacceptable.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS