Wasteful real estate practice
I noticed a strange and wasteful phenomena on how real estate developers market their developments. Have you ever noticed that no real estate developer will make do without completing those elaborate and obscenely furnished “show-houses,” which look more like palaces? And four-to-six-months later, the developer tears the whole ensemble down.
I once asked a developer why he did this and who paid for such extravagant waste. He told me it was because of competition; moreover the cost can be included in the price that the buyer pays.
This does not make sense to me. It is more like the developers are egotistic and trying to outdo each other at our expense, the taken-for-a-ride buyers. If it really is a competition, let us compare with Singapore, which has no such unhealthy practice, not even if the developers are selling luxurious developments. The most they would do is build a makeshift show-house that is just adequately furnished to reflect the flavor of the interior designer.
And mind you, this is on the site of the development and once the sales activities are over, the “show house” then doubles as a site office. For those who think it is inconvenient to go to the site, well, you can just view the model of the development in the real estate developer’s office downtown.
It breaks my heart when I see a “palace” built at -lightning speed being torn down in just a few months time. Some of these palaces are deliberately built off the site of the development, but in strategic locations to draw in crowds. Guess who absorbs the rental charge for that piece of land.
These “palaces” are really out of the ordinary, furnished to the brim with exotic furniture and the latest electronic gadgets and lighting, complete with fountains and gardens that resemble Neverland.
Imagine the waste, not to mention the electricity needed to light these “palaces” up at night. The materials that go into them are only minimally recycled or not at all — the glass and mirrors, used to project a high-class look, are smashed to smithereens and discarded; the wood fixtures are totally destroyed and none recycled; the marble and other tiles are thrown away.
In South Korea, the government is so obsessed with construction waste that developers must abide by laws on limiting waste and recycling as much construction material as possible.
This is just one strange example of how real estate is sold in Taiwan. Another unreasonable opportunity for developers to make more money is to factor in community space into the overall price of a unit. I see no sense in paying for floor space on the elevator landing, the elevator motor room, the staircases, the corridors, the attic, etc.
Is Taiwan taking us for a ride?
CHEW LEONG HONG
Sijhih, New Taipei City
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS