Wasteful real estate practice
I noticed a strange and wasteful phenomena on how real estate developers market their developments. Have you ever noticed that no real estate developer will make do without completing those elaborate and obscenely furnished “show-houses,” which look more like palaces? And four-to-six-months later, the developer tears the whole ensemble down.
I once asked a developer why he did this and who paid for such extravagant waste. He told me it was because of competition; moreover the cost can be included in the price that the buyer pays.
This does not make sense to me. It is more like the developers are egotistic and trying to outdo each other at our expense, the taken-for-a-ride buyers. If it really is a competition, let us compare with Singapore, which has no such unhealthy practice, not even if the developers are selling luxurious developments. The most they would do is build a makeshift show-house that is just adequately furnished to reflect the flavor of the interior designer.
And mind you, this is on the site of the development and once the sales activities are over, the “show house” then doubles as a site office. For those who think it is inconvenient to go to the site, well, you can just view the model of the development in the real estate developer’s office downtown.
It breaks my heart when I see a “palace” built at -lightning speed being torn down in just a few months time. Some of these palaces are deliberately built off the site of the development, but in strategic locations to draw in crowds. Guess who absorbs the rental charge for that piece of land.
These “palaces” are really out of the ordinary, furnished to the brim with exotic furniture and the latest electronic gadgets and lighting, complete with fountains and gardens that resemble Neverland.
Imagine the waste, not to mention the electricity needed to light these “palaces” up at night. The materials that go into them are only minimally recycled or not at all — the glass and mirrors, used to project a high-class look, are smashed to smithereens and discarded; the wood fixtures are totally destroyed and none recycled; the marble and other tiles are thrown away.
In South Korea, the government is so obsessed with construction waste that developers must abide by laws on limiting waste and recycling as much construction material as possible.
This is just one strange example of how real estate is sold in Taiwan. Another unreasonable opportunity for developers to make more money is to factor in community space into the overall price of a unit. I see no sense in paying for floor space on the elevator landing, the elevator motor room, the staircases, the corridors, the attic, etc.
Is Taiwan taking us for a ride?
CHEW LEONG HONG
Sijhih, New Taipei City
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS