Wasteful real estate practice
I noticed a strange and wasteful phenomena on how real estate developers market their developments. Have you ever noticed that no real estate developer will make do without completing those elaborate and obscenely furnished “show-houses,” which look more like palaces? And four-to-six-months later, the developer tears the whole ensemble down.
I once asked a developer why he did this and who paid for such extravagant waste. He told me it was because of competition; moreover the cost can be included in the price that the buyer pays.
This does not make sense to me. It is more like the developers are egotistic and trying to outdo each other at our expense, the taken-for-a-ride buyers. If it really is a competition, let us compare with Singapore, which has no such unhealthy practice, not even if the developers are selling luxurious developments. The most they would do is build a makeshift show-house that is just adequately furnished to reflect the flavor of the interior designer.
And mind you, this is on the site of the development and once the sales activities are over, the “show house” then doubles as a site office. For those who think it is inconvenient to go to the site, well, you can just view the model of the development in the real estate developer’s office downtown.
It breaks my heart when I see a “palace” built at -lightning speed being torn down in just a few months time. Some of these palaces are deliberately built off the site of the development, but in strategic locations to draw in crowds. Guess who absorbs the rental charge for that piece of land.
These “palaces” are really out of the ordinary, furnished to the brim with exotic furniture and the latest electronic gadgets and lighting, complete with fountains and gardens that resemble Neverland.
Imagine the waste, not to mention the electricity needed to light these “palaces” up at night. The materials that go into them are only minimally recycled or not at all — the glass and mirrors, used to project a high-class look, are smashed to smithereens and discarded; the wood fixtures are totally destroyed and none recycled; the marble and other tiles are thrown away.
In South Korea, the government is so obsessed with construction waste that developers must abide by laws on limiting waste and recycling as much construction material as possible.
This is just one strange example of how real estate is sold in Taiwan. Another unreasonable opportunity for developers to make more money is to factor in community space into the overall price of a unit. I see no sense in paying for floor space on the elevator landing, the elevator motor room, the staircases, the corridors, the attic, etc.
Is Taiwan taking us for a ride?
CHEW LEONG HONG
Sijhih, New Taipei City
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS