With warships and missiles, Russia is flexing its muscles in Asia in a bid to defend its position as an Asian power against China’s growing might.
China’s rise has forced Russia’s leaders to turn their gaze eastward and reassess decades of Soviet-era planning for a land war on the European plain or the nightmare of a nuclear conflict with the US.
The match between the world’s largest energy producer, Russia, and its largest energy consumer, China, might seem ideal. However, the speed with which China’s military is growing presses the question: How can Moscow feed the Chinese dragon with oil and gas, but still contend with its
increasing power?
Russia’s attempt to muscle back into Asia, riddled with territorial conflicts and eyed by the world’s top two military spenders — the US and China — is Moscow’s best, albeit imperfect, response to that question.
“Russia is still an Asia-Pacific power,” said Pavel Baev of the Peace Research Institute Oslo. “Moscow’s plans are definitely a signal to China that Russia takes this area seriously.”
Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin has promised more than US$651 billion in defense spending during the next decade for an annual average of about US$65 billion a year. Russia spent US$61 billion last year.
US core military spending was US$530 billion last year, while China, the world’s second-largest military spender, said it put nearly US$78 billion into arms last year, although some analysts believe that number may be higher.
Among the first arms to be sent east will be the two Mistral helicopter carriers that Moscow agreed to buy from France late last year and are expected to arrive in Russian hands in late 2013. A unit of the Russian S-400 air-defense missile system, able to counter missiles and aircraft, will also be planted in Asia.
Russian Deputy Defense Minister Nikolai Pankov said in an interview with Ekho Moskvy radio last month that the military was giving its Asian forces “top--priority attention.”
A new nuclear arms limitation treaty between Russia and the US has reinforced statements on both sides that war between Moscow and the West is unthinkable and given the Kremlin room to send more resources east.
ISLANDS SPAT
Russian President Dmitry Medvedev vowed last month to deploy weapons on a group of small islands at the center of a territorial row with Japan. Medvedev visited the islands in November last year, followed by top officials including Russian Defense Minister Anatoly Serdyukov.
Emphasizing its claim on the islands Soviet forces occupied at the end of World War II, Russia has found a reason to boost its arms in the East. However, some see talk about Japan as a bluff.
“I think that spot was chosen not at random, but as a place where Russia can take a stance without taking any major risks,” like upsetting China, Baev said.
Russia took over large swathes of resource-rich eastern Siberia from China through a combination of negotiation and military force in the mid-19th century.
Much of Moscow’s policy toward China, Russia’s largest trade partner with about US$9.5 billion in bilateral trade, has been formed around fears Beijing wants that thinly populated land back, either as room for its burgeoning population or to exploit the minerals, oil and gas it holds.
INVASION FEARS
In 2008 Moscow ceded 174km2 of land to Beijing on their shared border along the Ussuri and Amur Rivers, where the two powers exchanged fire in 1969, leaving nearly 60 dead.
“They’re still worried that China will invade Siberia one day because of the resources,” Dmitry Gorenburg, a senior analyst at military and public sector think tank CNA, said in an interview last month.
“Because from the Russian point of view it’s a very sparsely populated area, hard to defend, very remote from the center of Russia,” he said.
Beijing has alarmed neighbors with claims on a series of uninhabited islets that Japan also considers its own.
Russia is by no means looking for a fight with China, but some analysts say Moscow wants to make sure China’s territorial claims do not upset a delicate balance of power in Asia.
Russia and China commissioned the Chinese arm of the East Siberia-Pacific Ocean pipeline this year, which is scheduled to send 300,000 barrels of crude per day to China for 20 years.
Russia’s naval plans aim to keep it the world’s top oil producer by protecting large offshore oil and gas holdings at Sakhalin, where a production-sharing agreement with Exxon Mobil will help make up for an expected oil shortfall in west Siberia.
China has been a big buyer of Russian arms, but its defense orders for Russian arms will be at best flat this year, in part due to the country’s own defense industry, which analysts say has come into its own in part by copying Russian technology.
Analysts say China’s own fifth-generation fighter plane, which Beijing unveiled during US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates’ recent visit to China, is little more than a tweaked version of a Russian design.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS