The modern pursuit of money in this territory of gleaming office towers and rural villages has long coexisted amicably with an embrace of ancient beliefs. Even a major brokerage firm issues an annual financial forecast based, lightheartedly, on the Chinese horoscope.
However, recent events have fueled fears that greed may be debasing the practice of feng shui, the Chinese system of geomancy by which the auspicious positioning of objects is believed to ensure harmony, health and fortune.
Some practitioners, worried that their profession may be falling into disrepute, recently formed a trade association that they hope will uphold high standards and provide confidence for the public.
Illustration: Yusha
Over the past year, a Hong Kong courtroom drama has been calling attention to the sort of ties between money and feng shui that underlie such concerns. Tony Chan (陳振聰), 51, a former bartender turned self-proclaimed feng shui master, is appealing a court decision rejecting his claim to the fortune of Nina Wang (龔如心), one of Asia’s wealthiest women when she died in 2007 at the age of 69.
Chan contends he was Wang’s longtime lover and spiritual adviser, and is the rightful heir to her estate. His critics have accused him of forging the will and using Wang’s belief in feng shui to isolate and delude her.
In addition, some people have called for investigations into how much of taxpayers’ money the Hong Kong government has been spending to accommodate feng shui adherents.
Villages are entitled to ask the government to pay to repair any adverse changes to the landscape that were caused by development. That covers not just environmental damage, but also the possibility that ill fortune was brought on by tearing down a tree or placing a road in a way that might disturb the local qi, the energy that some Chinese believe pervades all things. Qi is a crucial factor in determining feng shui.
Requested repairs to restore positive feng shui can involve construction, like building a pavilion, or, according to the Hong Kong Lands Department, they could take the form of rituals to “drive away evil spirits and appease the gods.”
Last year, a local group challenged a village chief’s claims for feng shui compensation tied to the planned construction of a high-speed rail line to connect Hong Kong and Guangzhou. The group, representing residents of the village of Kap Lung, said the chief’s feng shui complaint was fraudulent, contending that he stood to gain financially from his request that a footbridge into the village be widened.
The chief’s company owns multiple plots of land in the area and a widened bridge to allow vehicles could make those properties more valuable, said Eddie Tse Sai-kit, a spokesman for the group, called the League of Rural-Government Collusion Monitoring.
“We want a transparent feng shui compensation system,” Tse said.
The government said in October that about US$1.2 million had been disbursed to villages since 2000 to conduct rituals to restore feng shui, but the South China Morning Post reported that the actual amount was US$72 million.
“Let’s be honest about it,” Roger Nissim, a former assistant director of lands for the government, said on a radio talk show. “Sometimes feng shui is misused and used as a lever for inappropriate amounts of compensation, and the administration has got to be aware of when it is being bluffed.”
“I believe the government treats feng shui compensation very carefully, but it is totally unacceptable that we do not know how much has been spent or what the policies are,” Hong Kong Legislative Councilor Tanya Chan (陳淑莊) said,
No one knows how many people in Hong Kong abide by the tenets of feng shui. Ho Pui-yin (何佩然), a history professor at the Chinese University of Hong Kong, said some people might be embarrassed to acknowledge following feng shui principles.
Still, Ho points to the popularity of celebrity feng shui consultants in newspaper columns and on television shows. She speculated that as many as half of the nearly 7 million people in Hong Kong at least casually follow feng shui beliefs.
Kerby Kuek (郭翹峰), who calls himself a feng shui master, said experts in the field could charge US$400 to US$40,000 to assess a small apartment of about 55m2, depending on the fame of the consultant. Louis Wong, who teaches feng shui, said classes could cost students about US$250 an hour.
It is not surprising, then, that so many people want to learn feng shui and teach it to others, Ho said.
Such temptations are what spurred one group of feng shui masters to form the International Taoist Feng Shui and Metaphysics Association last month. They hope to restore the reputation of a profession that they worry is increasingly viewed as fraudulent. The association’s founders said it would offer courses to the public as well as a quality rating system for feng shui masters.
Some feng shui teachers in Hong Kong are not convinced that the association will do more than serve the financial interests of the organizers, rather than enhance the reputation of an ancient belief system.
“I agree with the idea of some organization to regulate feng shui in Hong Kong,” Wong said. “But maybe this is a job for the government, and should not be left to individuals.”
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS