Celebrations for the 100th anniversary of the Republic of China (ROC) are ongoing, so why do I say Taiwanese should wise up and muster the courage to get over the whole ROC issue? There is a long list of reasons, but I will only cite a few here.
First, the ROC has never gained the recognition of the international community, which recognizes only “one China” — that is, the administration in Beijing as the sole legitimate government of China. This decision was made in October 1971, when the UN General Assembly passed Resolution 2758.
The international community refers to us as Taiwan and not the ROC. If we want Taiwan to become a country, we should use the word “Taiwan” at all times to refer to ourselves, and not “Chinese Taipei,” which means “Taipei that belongs to China.” Nor should we have a national title that includes the name “China,” because the international community has no idea what the “ROC” means.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration are focused on eventual unification with China and making the 100 years of ROC history part of Chinese history, just like the Song, Yuan, Ming and Qing dynasties. If Taiwan continues to be associated with the ROC, it will become a part of China. Even worse, both the governments of the ROC and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) support the idea that Taiwan is a part of China and accept the “one China” principle.
I hope that we and our children and grandchildren will not have to continue to live in this fictional ROC. Many Taiwanese cannot even name the capital of the ROC, which Ma would probably tell us is in Nanjing. Few Taiwanese have ever visited this so-called “capital” of their “republic.” Nor is there a need to say that the ROC’s territory includes the two UN members of the PRC and Mongolia.
It is rather embarrassing when people use the phrase wo guo (我國, our country) and talk about the vastness of the nation’s territory. Small wonder many Taiwanese still look down on their homeland and view the place where they grew up as a “small island.”
“The ROC” is not a nation built by us or our ancestors. It is therefore no wonder that the people of Taiwan have been forced to defer to the ROC officials that came over after World War II or any official that China sends over.
Our ancestors had to live through the 228 Massacre and the White Terror era, but now the government is using its resources to protect the safety and dignity of visiting Chinese officials. This is all happening because we were forced to accept a prefabricated government and have had to embrace a nation that we had no part whatsoever in building.
Chen Wen-hsien is a professor at National Chengchi University’s Graduate Institute of History.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
A Pale View of Hills, a movie released last year, follows the story of a Japanese woman from Nagasaki who moved to Britain in the 1950s with her British husband and daughter from a previous marriage. The daughter was born at a time when memories of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki during World War II and anxiety over the effects of nuclear radiation still haunted the community. It is a reflection on the legacy of the local and national trauma of the bombing that ended the period of Japanese militarism. A central theme of the movie is the need, at
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on Friday used their legislative majority to push their version of a special defense budget bill to fund the purchase of US military equipment, with the combined spending capped at NT$780 billion (US$24.78 billion). The bill, which fell short of the Executive Yuan’s NT$1.25 trillion request, was passed by a 59-0 margin with 48 abstentions in the 113-seat legislature. KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), who reportedly met with TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) for a private meeting before holding a joint post-vote news conference, was said to have mobilized her
RSS