Common sense has prevailed. Three Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Taipei City councilors were found not guilty on Oct. 28 of charges they had defaced an historical landmark by painting over the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) emblem on the East (Jingfu) Gate (景福門).
While the gate, built in 1882, is a Class 1 historical site, the KMT “sun” emblem was only added to it in 1966 when the then-KMT government renovated three out of the four surviving gates from Taipei’s old city wall — and carved and painted its emblem into them. The city’s Department of Cultural Affairs launched another renovation project on the gates in the spring of last year as part of its effort to “transform the sites into landmarks.” Apparently some officials did not realize the gates had already been landmarks for 127 years.
City councilors Chuang Ruei-hsiung (莊瑞雄), Huang Hsiang-chun (黃向群) and Liu Yao-ren (劉耀仁) said they were simply doing their duty by monitoring the city’s maintenance work when they spotted the repainted KMT emblem on the East Gate. Given that this happened just three days after President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and the KMT celebrated his first year in office, it is understandable that the DPP members might have seen this touch-up as a return to the bad old days when the KMT emblem — or Chiang Kai-shek’s (蔣介石) likeness — was plastered on just about every building or landmark. The councilors said they decided to rectify the situation by returning the gate to the way it looked during the Qing Dynasty.
While there was much fury from KMT members and Taipei Mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌) after the trio did their bit of painting, even the city’s Cultural Assets Review Committee had to admit that the Council of Cultural Affairs had not mentioned the KMT symbol when it designated the East Gate a national monument in 1998, and that therefore the need to preserve the emblem on the gate was open to question.
Even so, Hau vowed to bring the DPP vandals to justice, although his logic was a tad faulty:
“We must all be humble before national monuments. Even as a mayor, I cannot order the department to make the emblem disappear,” he said.
He appeared to have forgotten how it had managed to “appear” in the first place.
In bringing charges against the DPP councilors, prosecutors said the three had defaced a cultural relic, and were therefore guilty of defacing an historical monument.
However, Taipei District Court Judge Lin Meng-huang (林孟皇) ruled that the emblem was a political insignia representative of the way Taiwan used to be a dictatorship. Although the emblem was protected by the Culture Heritage Preservation Act (文化資產保存法), he said the KMT had put it on the gate as part of its efforts to reinforce its legitimacy and therefore the emblem was an expression of ideology. Painting over the emblem could not be considered “defacing” a historical monument, he ruled.
The East Gate and its three siblings have survived destruction of the wall and the West Gate in 1904 by the Japanese colonial administration, allied bombings during World War II and the upheaval of urban renewal over the past six decades, so it’s hard to see how slapping on some paint to cover up a 42-year-old emblem could be considered worth a court case.
While the Taipei City Government said it would wait to see if the prosecutors want to appeal the ruling, Taipei residents can only hope that cooler — or perhaps more budget-conscious — heads will prevail and not waste more taxpayer money by pursuing the case. After all, the city hasn’t bothered to “repair” the emblem since it was “destroyed.”
Taipei’s city gates are worth preserving. Outdated political ideology is not.
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
RSS