Common sense has prevailed. Three Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Taipei City councilors were found not guilty on Oct. 28 of charges they had defaced an historical landmark by painting over the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) emblem on the East (Jingfu) Gate (景福門).
While the gate, built in 1882, is a Class 1 historical site, the KMT “sun” emblem was only added to it in 1966 when the then-KMT government renovated three out of the four surviving gates from Taipei’s old city wall — and carved and painted its emblem into them. The city’s Department of Cultural Affairs launched another renovation project on the gates in the spring of last year as part of its effort to “transform the sites into landmarks.” Apparently some officials did not realize the gates had already been landmarks for 127 years.
City councilors Chuang Ruei-hsiung (莊瑞雄), Huang Hsiang-chun (黃向群) and Liu Yao-ren (劉耀仁) said they were simply doing their duty by monitoring the city’s maintenance work when they spotted the repainted KMT emblem on the East Gate. Given that this happened just three days after President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and the KMT celebrated his first year in office, it is understandable that the DPP members might have seen this touch-up as a return to the bad old days when the KMT emblem — or Chiang Kai-shek’s (蔣介石) likeness — was plastered on just about every building or landmark. The councilors said they decided to rectify the situation by returning the gate to the way it looked during the Qing Dynasty.
While there was much fury from KMT members and Taipei Mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌) after the trio did their bit of painting, even the city’s Cultural Assets Review Committee had to admit that the Council of Cultural Affairs had not mentioned the KMT symbol when it designated the East Gate a national monument in 1998, and that therefore the need to preserve the emblem on the gate was open to question.
Even so, Hau vowed to bring the DPP vandals to justice, although his logic was a tad faulty:
“We must all be humble before national monuments. Even as a mayor, I cannot order the department to make the emblem disappear,” he said.
He appeared to have forgotten how it had managed to “appear” in the first place.
In bringing charges against the DPP councilors, prosecutors said the three had defaced a cultural relic, and were therefore guilty of defacing an historical monument.
However, Taipei District Court Judge Lin Meng-huang (林孟皇) ruled that the emblem was a political insignia representative of the way Taiwan used to be a dictatorship. Although the emblem was protected by the Culture Heritage Preservation Act (文化資產保存法), he said the KMT had put it on the gate as part of its efforts to reinforce its legitimacy and therefore the emblem was an expression of ideology. Painting over the emblem could not be considered “defacing” a historical monument, he ruled.
The East Gate and its three siblings have survived destruction of the wall and the West Gate in 1904 by the Japanese colonial administration, allied bombings during World War II and the upheaval of urban renewal over the past six decades, so it’s hard to see how slapping on some paint to cover up a 42-year-old emblem could be considered worth a court case.
While the Taipei City Government said it would wait to see if the prosecutors want to appeal the ruling, Taipei residents can only hope that cooler — or perhaps more budget-conscious — heads will prevail and not waste more taxpayer money by pursuing the case. After all, the city hasn’t bothered to “repair” the emblem since it was “destroyed.”
Taipei’s city gates are worth preserving. Outdated political ideology is not.
Singaporean former Prime Minister and current senior minister Lee Hsien- Loong(李顯龍) last month stood on Chinese soil and told Beijing that Singapore cooperates because of “shared interests”, not because of common “ethnic descent,” a significant statement that has upended China’s cognitive warfare tactics of “ethnic nationalism.” Along with using its military buildup and economic growth to expand its international dominance, China has long deployed ethnic politics to promote the idea that all ethnic Chinese around the world, regardless of citizenship, share a tight bond with the Chinese motherland, by which it means the regime of the People’s Republic of China (PRC)
When I visited Taiwan last summer, I called on the nation to use its status as a technology superpower to build superweapons. It is obvious to me as I return a year later that Taiwan is now answering that call. By 2030, Taiwan envisions a domestic drone hub, capable of producing large quantities of drones per year. The nation continues to tighten cooperation across the private sector, scientific researchers and the elected government, on creating new and innovative production avenues for defense, while efforts to become central to the “democratic supply chain” are only increasing. Anduril is seeing all of these positive
A recent report concerning a student who is suing his teacher posed the question in its headline: Does failing a student in two subjects constitute bullying? The college student in Chiayi County apparently sought NT$2 million (US$63,603) in state compensation, but a court dismissed the case. The first reaction of many might have been to ask: What has happened to students nowadays? Some say that teachers have lost their authority, while others say students are overindulged. Some even start reminiscing over the days when “whatever the teacher says goes.” However, the real issue might be overlooked if emotional reactions like that are the
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) in San Francisco on Tuesday last week said if she had not met with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), she would have been “just a plain” and “even negligible” KMT chairperson, bluntly signaling the role she is playing in her visit to the US — Beijing’s messenger from Taiwan. Cheng and her delegation arrived in the US on Monday last week for a two-week visit across five major cities. Her party said the group is scheduled to meet with US lawmakers, officials, policy experts and businesspeople. Before departing, Cheng said her trip