For people outside the banking sector, China’s approval on Thursday for four Taiwanese banks to upgrade their representative offices into branches reflects further progress in cooperation across the Taiwan Strait following the signing of the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA).
However, for insiders the move represents a potential game-changer in the cross-strait financial sector, foretelling the onset of more competition for banks on both sides, rather than cooperation.
With this regulatory go-ahead, through their Chinese branches, the Taiwanese lenders will be able to offer yuan-based services to Taiwanese companies in China after one year of operation if they have a proven track record of posting a profit. With two years of profit making, these branches can extend the yuan services to all customers in China.
At a glance, it would seem that their greater access to the Chinese market would mean improved earning for the Taiwanese banks, especially given the highly fragmented market and stiff competition on their home turf. It is no surprise then that several financial shares surged on the local bourse on Friday thanks to the news of the China branches.
There is no doubt that China’s approval of the branches had been eagerly awaited by Taiwanese banks, even though other restrictions on banking operations in China remain, such as limitations on the savings-to-loans ratio, the number of branches and source of loans.
However, the issue is not really about whether Taiwanese banks can earn in China or how fast they can make that happen, which may occur eventually in the longer term, but not in the near-term. In fact, what is bound to happen very soon is the recruitment of new employees, the development of business strategies and the establishment of new information systems at their new branches.
Unknown operating risks and strong domestic competition in China are likely to hinder Taiwanese banks during the first few years of operation, while developing capabilities to control credit risks and maintain adequate capitalization to support further business growth in China will be their next challenge.
Moreover, cross-strait banking is a sensitive issue to both Taiwan and China, not only because the issue involves political and economic considerations, but also because the stabilization in the domestic financial market on either side is important to national security.
Therefore, since financial regulators on both sides have taken cautious and gradual steps regarding the opening of cross-strait market access, people should not have unrealistic expectations about the branch openings as well.
Moreover, Taiwanese regulators will eventually give the green light to Chinese lenders to set up shop, based on the principle of reciprocity and to comply with the ECFA.
While Taiwan’s fragmented and competitive market — known for generating relatively thin profit margins compared with China’s — is not likely to initially attract many Chinese lenders looking to expand to Taiwan, they will come eventually. And with their more substantial assets and bigger business scale, Chinese banks are likely to become strong rivals to their Taiwanese peers and significantly impact market dynamics in this sector.
Under the mandate of the Taiwanese and Chinese governments, cross-strait trade exchanges and liberalization are accelerating. As this trend continues, financial regulators on both sides should encourage their banks to take a cautious attitude when branching out into each other’s market and offer them an environment of fair competition on a level playing field. The reality is that when it comes to business, prudence is of utmost significance.
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
US President Donald Trump’s alleged request that Taiwanese President William Lai (賴清德) not stop in New York while traveling to three of Taiwan’s diplomatic allies, after his administration also rescheduled a visit to Washington by the minister of national defense, sets an unwise precedent and risks locking the US into a trajectory of either direct conflict with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) or capitulation to it over Taiwan. Taiwanese authorities have said that no plans to request a stopover in the US had been submitted to Washington, but Trump shared a direct call with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平)
Heavy rains over the past week have overwhelmed southern and central Taiwan, with flooding, landslides, road closures, damage to property and the evacuations of thousands of people. Schools and offices were closed in some areas due to the deluge throughout the week. The heavy downpours brought by the southwest monsoon are a second blow to a region still recovering from last month’s Typhoon Danas. Strong winds and significant rain from the storm inflicted more than NT$2.6 billion (US$86.6 million) in agricultural losses, and damaged more than 23,000 roofs and a record high of nearly 2,500 utility poles, causing power outages. As
The greatest pressure Taiwan has faced in negotiations stems from its continuously growing trade surplus with the US. Taiwan’s trade surplus with the US reached an unprecedented high last year, surging by 54.6 percent from the previous year and placing it among the top six countries with which the US has a trade deficit. The figures became Washington’s primary reason for adopting its firm stance and demanding substantial concessions from Taipei, which put Taiwan at somewhat of a disadvantage at the negotiating table. Taiwan’s most crucial bargaining chip is undoubtedly its key position in the global semiconductor supply chain, which led