Just before the 20th anniversary of the 1989 Tiananmen Square Massacre on Friday, I received an e-mail from a person in Hong Kong.
The writer said that even after 21 years, victims of the massacre have still not been rehabilitated and expressed hopes that on one beautiful Sunday in the future, hundreds and maybe thousands of people will be able to gather around the Monument to the People’s Heroes and loudly sing Bloodstained Glory together.
The letter also expressed hopes that this day would come before he was an old man.
If I had to write about how I feel about the 20th anniversary of the massacre, I would rather write this piece in its entirety because the feelings expressed in it are an accurate portrayal of the feelings that have been felt by Chinese people in China, Hong Kong, Taiwan and other places around the world since the crackdown occurred.
This piece expresses far better the pain and long-lasting memories of the crackdown than me talking about the event from the perspective of somebody who was there.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is not dealing with the pain accumulated during the development of the Chinese nation and it is also attempting to erase history.
The result is that instead of relieving the pain, it is becoming more deeply embedded.
This is without a doubt a crime against the Chinese people.
Will history really disappear into the past by covering up the truth? Can the pain be made to disappear by suppressing freedom of expression?
The CCP practices self-deception and it is extremely irresponsible toward both the people and the country.
Some say China has seen great change in the past 21 years and that we should forget the past and look to the future.
My answer to this is that while 21 years have gone by since the massacre and while China has indeed experienced great change, we must also see that many things have not changed.
We have seen human rights activist Liu Xiaobo (劉曉波) receive a heavy sentence for exercising his right to freedom of expression — I would like to ask how that is any different from the time of the Cultural Revolution.
We have seen how the judicial system is unable to function independently and fulfill its social function and how people who feel they have suffered injustices can only seek redress by petitioning the government, while having to suffer abuse and persecution in the process.
How is this any different from the end of the 1970s?
We have seen how the gap between the rich and poor has widened along with continuously increasing levels of social dissatisfaction. Is this any more advanced than the China of the 1980s?
How can any person with a conscience cover their own eyes and only look at the things that have changed, but ignore the things that have not changed?
With so many of the problems that compelled students and their supporters to take to the streets in protest in 1989 still in existence, how can we afford to forget?
Wang Dan is a prominent figure in China’s democracy movement and holds a PhD in history from Harvard University.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
A failure by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to respond to Israel’s brilliant 12-day (June 12-23) bombing and special operations war against Iran, topped by US President Donald Trump’s ordering the June 21 bombing of Iranian deep underground nuclear weapons fuel processing sites, has been noted by some as demonstrating a profound lack of resolve, even “impotence,” by China. However, this would be a dangerous underestimation of CCP ambitions and its broader and more profound military response to the Trump Administration — a challenge that includes an acceleration of its strategies to assist nuclear proxy states, and developing a wide array
Eating at a breakfast shop the other day, I turned to an old man sitting at the table next to mine. “Hey, did you hear that the Legislative Yuan passed a bill to give everyone NT$10,000 [US$340]?” I said, pointing to a newspaper headline. The old man cursed, then said: “Yeah, the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT] canceled the NT$100 billion subsidy for Taiwan Power Co and announced they would give everyone NT$10,000 instead. “Nice. Now they are saying that if electricity prices go up, we can just use that cash to pay for it,” he said. “I have no time for drivel like
Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) reportedly told the EU’s top diplomat that China does not want Russia to lose in Ukraine, because the US could shift its focus to countering Beijing. Wang made the comment while meeting with EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Kaja Kallas on July 2 at the 13th China-EU High-Level Strategic Dialogue in Brussels, the South China Morning Post and CNN reported. Although contrary to China’s claim of neutrality in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, such a frank remark suggests Beijing might prefer a protracted war to keep the US from focusing on
Twenty-four Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers are facing recall votes on Saturday, prompting nearly all KMT officials and lawmakers to rally their supporters over the past weekend, urging them to vote “no” in a bid to retain their seats and preserve the KMT’s majority in the Legislative Yuan. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which had largely kept its distance from the civic recall campaigns, earlier this month instructed its officials and staff to support the recall groups in a final push to protect the nation. The justification for the recalls has increasingly been framed as a “resistance” movement against China and
RSS