One of the eternal themes of Chinese history is that “he who conquers is crowned king, he who fails is a brigand.” Official histories have mostly been written by those in power, while stirring tales of the vanquished circulate as unofficial histories or folk tales. The history of Whampoa Military Academy is viewed differently in China and Taiwan, but there is one common factor — the role of academy founder Sun Yat-sen (孫逸仙).
Sun was chairman of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and is considered the father of the Republic of China. From Beijing’s point of view, Sun was a pioneer of the Chinese revolution and his historical status is on a par with Mao Zedong (毛澤東). This shared respect for Sun has led to a relative decline in the status of Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), the long-term commandant of the academy. This focus is evident in the title of a forum on the subject held in Taipei a few days ago: “Dr Sun Yat-sen, the Whampoa Military Academy and Cross-Strait Relations.”
All speakers at the forum, when talking about Sun, echoed one another in calling for people to adhere to the spirit of our forebears and to promote the peaceful development of cross-strait relations.
In reality, the real founding father of the academy, which was established in 1924, was Chiang. It was he who established the Whampoa revolutionary spirit that was to inspire the Northern Expedition and the war of resistance against Japan. However, Chiang did not choose his friends wisely. Many of those who later rose in rebellion against him were former students and colleagues.
In the end, Chiang was defeated and withdrew to Taiwan where he died in 1975.
The Whampoa graduates Chiang brought with him to Taiwan are now forgetting their roots. Instead, they echo China’s version of history and that of the Whampoa graduates who threw their lot in with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), by suggesting above all else that the academy represented a period of successful united front cooperation between the KMT and the CCP thanks to former Chinese premier Zhou Enlai (周恩來), who was director of the academy’s political department. They also reiterated the claim that Zhou, on his deathbed, called on his countrymen not to forget Taiwan — meaning the task of unifying Taiwan with China.
Whampoa Military Academy enrolled students for six academic terms during the first KMT-CCP united front (1923-1927), during which 7,399 graduated from the first five intakes, but only 718 from the sixth in February 1929. Graduates of these first six intakes enjoyed high status and strong influence in KMT military circles. Moreover, there was a strict adherence to seniority favoring earlier graduates, who went on to exert considerable influence over those who followed.
Few graduates of this period are still alive in either Taiwan or China, so the recent forum was dominated by later graduates. The theme they chose was: “Uphold Sun Yat-sen’s principles, enhance and glorify the Whampoa spirit and promote the peaceful development of cross-strait relations.”
Chiang’s role was intentionally glossed over, probably because of his staunch opposition to communism and his adherence to the camp of democratic nations. After all, Article 1 of the KMT Charter says that the party’s purpose is to “realize a free, democratic Republic of China in which every citizen prospers,” and that is something that will not change anytime soon.
There is nothing wrong with Whampoa alumni engaging in lively debate, but it no longer has anything to do with the Whampoa spirit. The CCP’s version of Whampoa is dominated by Marxism-Leninism and the ideologies of Mao Zedong and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平) and it is seen as a precursor to the People’s Liberation Army.
In contrast, Taiwan has long since nationalized its armed forces so that they are now loyal not to the KMT, but to the democratic state and the people, as expressed in the motto “Nation, duty, honor.” In this sense, the armed forces of China and Taiwan could not be more different.
It’s fine to have a forum if it is just a social activity for academy alumni, but if it has the ulterior motive of borrowing from historical Whampoa to encourage Taiwanese to support the government’s approach to cross-strait relations today, then it inevitably runs up against the fact that the military systems of Taiwan and China are fundamentally different.
Lu I-ming is the former publisher and president of Taiwan Shin Sheng Daily News.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
The US Department of Defense recently released this year’s “Report on Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China.” This annual report provides a comprehensive overview of China’s military capabilities, strategic objectives and evolving global ambitions. Taiwan features prominently in this year’s report, as capturing the nation remains central to Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) vision of the “great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation,” a goal he has set for 2049. The report underscores Taiwan’s critical role in China’s long-term strategy, highlighting its significance as a geopolitical flashpoint and a key target in China’s quest to assert dominance
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
The National Development Council (NDC) on Wednesday last week launched a six-month “digital nomad visitor visa” program, the Central News Agency (CNA) reported on Monday. The new visa is for foreign nationals from Taiwan’s list of visa-exempt countries who meet financial eligibility criteria and provide proof of work contracts, but it is not clear how it differs from other visitor visas for nationals of those countries, CNA wrote. The NDC last year said that it hoped to attract 100,000 “digital nomads,” according to the report. Interest in working remotely from abroad has significantly increased in recent years following improvements in
RSS