In a world where the daily news feeds us a strong dose of war, famine, environmental calamity and man’s general inhumanity to man, positive stories are rare. Human goodness simply isn’t as “newsworthy” as, say, the latest bloody clashes in the streets of Bangkok.
That is not to say that there is no place in the news for nice, heart-warming stories like the one about vegetable vendor Chen Shu-chu (陳樹菊), who earlier this month was flown to New York City to receive an award for her years of generous deeds. There is always a place for such stories and many people wish there were more.
However, when a person’s selflessness is hijacked by the government for political purposes, it is a travesty and the good news turns sour. This, sadly, was exactly what has happened with Chen and President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration bears full responsibility for making a mockery of everything the humble lady from Taitung County stands for.
From the minute the announcement was made that Time magazine would honor Chen in New York, government officials turned the whole thing into a circus. Ministry of Foreign Affairs officials intervened to make sure she received a speedy visa from the American Institute in Taiwan. Then, an evidently overwhelmed Chen was repeatedly coached by ministry officials during media interviews in New York to thank Ma, the government and to state that she “represented the president and the minister of foreign affairs.”
When did the celebration of a person’s good deeds turn into a public relations opportunity for the government? Chen didn’t represent Ma, the government or the ministry — she represented herself.
For an embattled administration with unenviable approval ratings, however, the temptation was too great. Out of the blue (even if the Liberty Times first reported her philanthropy nearly four years ago and Forbes magazine hailed her in March) came this timely gift from the east in whose bright light the entire administration could bask to make itself look good. To add insult to injury, some legislators have suggested including Chen’s story in textbooks for elementary and high-school teachers. They have also floated the idea of a biography, while the Government Information Office has reportedly been mulling a movie biopic.
This would all be farcical were it not so reminiscent of state propaganda across the Taiwan Strait. Remember the young short-track speed skater Zhou Yang (周洋), who in February was chided by Chinese Vice Sports Minister Yu Zaiqing (于再清) for thanking her parents — but not her country — after winning gold at the Vancouver Winter Games? In this context, the individual becomes faceless, swallowed by a brand of nationalism that in reality is good publicity for the ruling elite and nothing more.
The government’s exploitation of Chen serves another, equally disturbing, purpose. It provides a timely distraction at a time when Taiwanese should be focusing on issues of tremendous importance to the nation’s future, among them the proposed economic cooperation framework agreement with China and whether to allow Chinese to study in Taiwan. Moreover, by bombarding us with the feel-good Chen story, the government hopes the public will somehow fail to notice that the legislature has been completely sidelined. The government hopes we will ignore its assault on the freedom of the press, the politicization of the judiciary, the secret deals with China and the exclusion of the majority from decisions that will affect the future of the country.
Chen deserves recognition and the thanks of the people she helped. How the Ma administration has exploited her story, however, is crass and comes straight out of the Chinese propaganda handbook.
Despite the complicated legacy of colonialism, relations between Taipei and Tokyo continue to blossom in these troubled times. As East Asia continues to battle the COVID-19 pandemic and struggles to contain an increasingly aggressive China, our democratic archipelago benefits from a new high in its security relations with Japan. Remarkably, with its generous vaccine diplomacy and the unprecedented explicit mention of the situation surrounding Taiwan in Japan’s annual defense white paper, Tokyo began to embrace a novel, two-track, comprehensive approach for engaging Taiwan. The first track deals with non-traditional security such as public health and vaccine donations. Japan has generously supported
As the incursions by China into Taiwan’s air defense identification zone intensify, the international community’s anxiety has risen over the question of whether the US military would become directly involved in the case of an attack on Taiwan. Washington’s long-held policy of “strategic ambiguity” does little to ease the trepidation. The rationale universally espoused on “strategic ambiguity” is that an announced commitment from Washington to directly defend Taiwan would encourage Taiwanese independence and consequently bring forth a Chinese military attack and a possible nuclear confrontation between two superpowers. However, this line of argument could soon lose steam if the subject is viewed from
Having deceived the world about its nuclear capabilities while preparing for an arms race, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is now using its increasing nuclear forces for virtual nuclear coercion. This new threat will continue until the United States, Japan, and Taiwan can restore the CCP’s sense of fear. This dynamic is a familiar one for Taiwan. As the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) capabilities have grown, its inhibitions about conducting larger and more frequent coercive military demonstrations have shrunk. The PLA now more openly practices for the destruction of Taiwan’s democracy and the murder of its citizens. In the nuclear realm,
In an unprecedented move, a group of democratic nations led by the US, UK and EU in a joint statement on Tuesday accused the Chinese Ministry of State Security of having carried out a major cyberattack earlier this year and stealing data from at least 30,000 organizations worldwide, including governments, universities and firms in key industries. Western officials were reportedly perplexed by the attack’s brazen execution and unparalleled scale. In an article on the attack, BBC security correspondent Gordon Corera wrote: “Western spies are still struggling to understand why Chinese behavior has changed.” The attack raises the fear “that they [China]