The recent disagreement between the Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC) and the central bank about asset bubbles and the “hot money” situation shows just how much the mindsets of financial officials can differ. However, this disagreement could send the wrong message to the market if the commission and the central bank cannot find a way to work things out.
FSC Chairman Sean Chen (陳冲) appears less concerned than the bank’s Deputy Governor George Chou (周阿定) about the formation of property bubbles in several areas of the country. During a legislative session last week, Chen assured lawmakers that the banking sector’s loans to property-related businesses account for 25 percent of its total loans.
At the same session, however, Chou said the bank believed the ratio had exceeded the ceiling and was somewhere between 30 percent and 35 percent “depending on a different calculation basis.”
Chou would not clarify the central bank’s “calculation basis,” except to say that asset bubbles in some metropolitan areas have triggered its concern.
It was natural that many people would assume Chou was talking about high-end luxury projects in Taipei City, especially after bank Governor Perng Fai-nan (彭淮南) complained about the pricing of a residential project in Shilin District (士林) by the Shining Group. Chou might be subtly giving the commission a warning that it should do more to rein in speculation-driven price hikes in Taipei City and the greater Taipei area.
The central bank has more experience in targeting speculative business activities, while the commission has developed something of an ostrich reputation for downplaying the asset bubble situation and focusing solely on the banking sector’s overall lending statistics. However, the central bank has not performed much better than the commission at actually bringing speculative activities under control. There is plenty of evidence that Taipei’s property boom has continued regardless of the government’s efforts to cool down the sector.
As for hot money, or capital inflows aimed at speculating on New Taiwan dollar gains, Chen disagreed with the central bank stance, which is to consider foreign funds sitting idle in local accounts after a certain period of time to be involved in currency speculation. Taking a free-market approach, he told lawmakers that not all idle overseas funds are being used for speculation.
Chen’s remarks echo those of some local bankers who have recommended that the central bank be more tolerant and turn those idle foreign accounts into investments in the TAIEX. That, however, is more easily said than done, since some of those idle funds, if not the majority of them, are targeted at the NT dollar, not local shares. It is also within the FSC’s purview, not the central bank’s, to turn idle inflows into investments in shares.
If Chen thinks the central bank’s stance is wrong, he should have the commission take action. Otherwise, his comments do nothing but confuse the market about what the central bank is trying to do.
Former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmaker Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) on Saturday won the party’s chairperson election with 65,122 votes, or 50.15 percent of the votes, becoming the second woman in the seat and the first to have switched allegiance from the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) to the KMT. Cheng, running for the top KMT position for the first time, had been termed a “dark horse,” while the biggest contender was former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), considered by many to represent the party’s establishment elite. Hau also has substantial experience in government and in the KMT. Cheng joined the Wild Lily Student
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has its chairperson election tomorrow. Although the party has long positioned itself as “China friendly,” the election is overshadowed by “an overwhelming wave of Chinese intervention.” The six candidates vying for the chair are former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), former lawmaker Cheng Li-wen (鄭麗文), Legislator Luo Chih-chiang (羅智強), Sun Yat-sen School president Chang Ya-chung (張亞中), former National Assembly representative Tsai Chih-hong (蔡志弘) and former Changhua County comissioner Zhuo Bo-yuan (卓伯源). While Cheng and Hau are front-runners in different surveys, Hau has complained of an online defamation campaign against him coming from accounts with foreign IP addresses,
When Taiwan High Speed Rail Corp (THSRC) announced the implementation of a new “quiet carriage” policy across all train cars on Sept. 22, I — a classroom teacher who frequently takes the high-speed rail — was filled with anticipation. The days of passengers videoconferencing as if there were no one else on the train, playing videos at full volume or speaking loudly without regard for others finally seemed numbered. However, this battle for silence was lost after less than one month. Faced with emotional guilt from infants and anxious parents, THSRC caved and retreated. However, official high-speed rail data have long
Taipei stands as one of the safest capital cities the world. Taiwan has exceptionally low crime rates — lower than many European nations — and is one of Asia’s leading democracies, respected for its rule of law and commitment to human rights. It is among the few Asian countries to have given legal effect to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant of Social Economic and Cultural Rights. Yet Taiwan continues to uphold the death penalty. This year, the government has taken a number of regressive steps: Executions have resumed, proposals for harsher prison sentences