In March 2008, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) became the sixth elected president of the Republic of China (ROC) with almost 7.66 million votes. Over his two years in office, Ma has continued to promote cross-strait negotiations and policies that involve opening Taiwan up to China.
He has promoted these policies by relying on his legitimacy as a popularly elected president, and although differences of opinion are unavoidable in a democracy, Ma has completed the groundwork for opening Taiwan up to China thanks to the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) legislative majority.
However, we care deeply about the development of democracy in Taiwan, and in the face of ongoing talks about the signing of an economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) with China, we feel it necessary to alert Ma to the following points.
The first point pertains to the limits of legitimacy of a popularly elected president. Although the president can decide the overall principles of national security policies, this does not mean he can do whatever he wants.
The 7.66 million votes Ma received two years ago is less than half of Taiwan’s population and, more importantly, the principles of democracy still apply once an election is over. The fact that people voted for Ma does not mean they gave him a blank check to do as he pleases.
While most Taiwanese believe Taiwan and China should engage in negotiations, that does not mean a majority of the public agree with China’s premise that anything can be discussed based on the “one China” principle. The Taiwanese public were even more worried in 2005 when Lien Chan (連戰), in his capacity as KMT chairman, signed a joint communique with the General-Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party Hu Jintao, (胡錦濤).
The communique stated that cross-strait negotiations should use the “direct three links” as a starting point and continue via the establishment of an economic cooperation mechanism, a cross-strait common market, a military confidence-building mechanism, then on to a peace agreement and a final solution. These guidelines clearly go beyond the powers bestowed on national leaders by the Constitution to handle matters of national security.
The second point is that a cross-strait trade agreement forced on the Taiwanese would lack legitimacy. While most people agree to a pragmatic approach to cross-strait trade and economic exchanges, a public consensus has yet to be reached on the issue of whether Taiwan and China should cancel the majority of tariffs and legal restrictions on trade then combining Taiwan and China into a free-trade area. These issues fill many people with doubt and worries.
Ma recently said in an interview that the ECFA talks focus on small but necessary issues and will be implemented gradually.
However, since current public opinion opposes the policy of creating a free-trade zone between Taiwan and China, what legitimacy and power does the president have to sign an economic agreement which would lead to the integration of the two sides into a free-trade area?
The third point we would like to make is that of responsible politics and generational justice. The policies and laws formulated by popularly elected officials can and do stay in place beyond their terms in office and therefore are legally binding and influence future generations. It is precisely for this reason that democratic politics require politicians to use their power carefully and take responsibility for future generations.
In particular, policies which relate to national security and the rights and welfare of the public must be limited by the principle of responsible politics. To ensure this, information on policies must be transparent, monitoring and checks and balances are necessary and should come from the separation of powers, and, where necessary, major issues should be decided by the public through a referendum.
The current ECFA policy which relies on China “letting the people of Taiwan benefit” may well let the current generation reap the benefits of the “early harvest” program that will result in more Taiwanese exports going to China. However, the next generation will have to deal with the impact on local industries of tariff-free imports from China. This is a very serious issue that will influence the welfare of future generations.
The government, however, is not disclosing information about the ECFA, it is not letting the legislature review it and it is not willing to put it to a referendum. These moves pose an unprecedented threat to Taiwan’s democracy and welfare.
We therefore urge Ma to be cautious when using his presidential powers. We also urge him to slow down the pace of the ECFA talks.
He should adopt a more responsible attitude and ensure that this major policy, which is linked to cross-strait relations and the future of democracy in Taiwan, be decided through open discussion.
If not, the inking of an ECFA will not only further aggravate domestic divisions, it will also increase social tensions on both sides of the Taiwan Strait. We are sure that this is something Ma does not want to see.
Honigmann Hong is an assistant professor in the China studies program at National Tsing Hua University, Lai Chung-chiang is a lawyer and Chen Shang-chih is an assistant professor in the department of political science at National Chung-Cheng University.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
Taiwan is a small, humble place. There is no Eiffel Tower, no pyramids — no singular attraction that draws the world’s attention. If it makes headlines, it is because China wants to invade. Yet, those who find their way here by some twist of fate often fall in love. If you ask them why, some cite numbers showing it is one of the freest and safest countries in the world. Others talk about something harder to name: The quiet order of queues, the shared umbrellas for anyone caught in the rain, the way people stand so elderly riders can sit, the
Taiwan’s fall would be “a disaster for American interests,” US President Donald Trump’s nominee for undersecretary of defense for policy Elbridge Colby said at his Senate confirmation hearing on Tuesday last week, as he warned of the “dramatic deterioration of military balance” in the western Pacific. The Republic of China (Taiwan) is indeed facing a unique and acute threat from the Chinese Communist Party’s rising military adventurism, which is why Taiwan has been bolstering its defenses. As US Senator Tom Cotton rightly pointed out in the same hearing, “[although] Taiwan’s defense spending is still inadequate ... [it] has been trending upwards
Small and medium enterprises make up the backbone of Taiwan’s economy, yet large corporations such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) play a crucial role in shaping its industrial structure, economic development and global standing. The company reported a record net profit of NT$374.68 billion (US$11.41 billion) for the fourth quarter last year, a 57 percent year-on-year increase, with revenue reaching NT$868.46 billion, a 39 percent increase. Taiwan’s GDP last year was about NT$24.62 trillion, according to the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, meaning TSMC’s quarterly revenue alone accounted for about 3.5 percent of Taiwan’s GDP last year, with the company’s
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
RSS