In two fast-paced April days in Washington, the world took a big step out of the age of mutually assured destruction (MAD) and into an even madder age, when a dark vision of random nuclear terror will shadow our days for decades or more to come.
Almost 20 years after the Cold War’s end, after the end of the chilling US-Russian nuclear standoff of MAD, US President Barack Obama ushered in the new era with an unprecedented, 47-nation summit to begin to confront this ultimate threat.
It was an important first step. From the highest levels, it conferred top priority on what is planned as a continuing effort to better marshal global resources to keep the stuff of nuclear bombs — plutonium and highly enriched uranium — out of the hands of terrorists and smugglers.
Doing so will demand unusual, difficult cooperation around the world. Nations’ nuclear secrets may be exposed. Global inspectors may spotlight governments’ ineptitude. International advisers may have to rewrite nations’ laws to crack down on nuclear sloppiness.
What’s needed is a “new manner of thinking,” Obama told the assembled presidents and prime ministers, echoing a prophetic warning from the earliest days of the nuclear age.
On Monday and Tuesday, signaling their readiness to join in, those leaders pointed to or pledged actions to better lock down weapons-grade nuclear material and technology.
Egypt boasted of new legislation criminalizing trafficking in nuclear goods, for example, and Malaysia of a law tightening export controls, in a nation grown notorious as a clandestine transit point for nuclear technology. Ukraine, Mexico and others vowed to give up their highly enriched uranium. And the leaders’ final communique endorsed Obama’s goal of securing all vulnerable nuclear materials within four years.
DIFFICULTIES
Experts say that will be hard to do, however, as the world tries to ascertain just how much is out there, where it is and what’s “vulnerable.” The fissile materials sit in some surprising places worldwide — in the power plants of Russian icebreakers and US missile submarines, in university research reactors, in storehouses within Japan’s nuclear power system. And hundreds of tonnes are packed into deployed or disused nuclear warheads in the US and Russia.
Experts can only estimate the amounts: Something between 1,179 and 1,724 tonnes of weapons-grade uranium is stockpiled worldwide, the authoritative International Panel on Fissile Materials reported last year. Mere kilograms, meanwhile, can make a city-leveling bomb.
The deadly tonnage accumulated during the MAD era, when the US and Russia outdid each other in producing these exotic man-made heavy metals, and even donated some to friendly nations for research reactors.
That Cold War rivalry has faded, but its fissile legacy lingers on. Now a nervous world worries less about a superpower Armageddon and more about the known nuclear aspirations of al-Qaeda and other terror groups.
No evidence has emerged that any have gotten close to obtaining or building a doomsday bomb. Analysts note, however, that the world didn’t know of the Sept. 11 terror plot before al-Qaeda struck.
“With what confidence does the intelligence community answer that question [about terrorists’ nuclear capabilities]?” wondered former ambassador Robert Gallucci, a veteran US government nonproliferation negotiator. “We really don’t know very much with confidence.”
As for the extent of nuclear trafficking, the International Atomic Energy Agency, the UN’s nuclear watchdog, counts almost two dozen known incidents involving plutonium or highly enriched uranium since the early 1990s. Again, however, the world doesn’t know what it doesn’t know.
Experts say what’s needed are more universal and stronger treaties and other agreements to collect and dispose of fissile materials, to stop their production, to share intelligence, to enact tougher domestic laws and with more money flowing from rich to poor nations to tighten borders and controls on illicit trade.
OVERSIGHT
A stronger IAEA and possibly new, permanent oversight bodies would have to grow ever more intrusive in demanding an accounting of bomb materials, even in the excess stockpiles of the US and Russian militaries, no-go areas in today’s world.
That’s why the US president told the summit the post-MAD era’s deadly new challenge requires “a new mindset,” and why he drove the point home with an assist from a genius who forever mourned his role in the making of the nuclear age.
“We are drifting toward a catastrophe beyond comparison,” Obama quoted Albert Einstein as saying in those early years. “We shall require a substantially new manner of thinking if mankind is to survive.”Charles J. Hanley has reported on nuclear arms control for three decades.
The US Senate’s passage of the 2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which urges Taiwan’s inclusion in the Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) exercise and allocates US$1 billion in military aid, marks yet another milestone in Washington’s growing support for Taipei. On paper, it reflects the steadiness of US commitment, but beneath this show of solidarity lies contradiction. While the US Congress builds a stable, bipartisan architecture of deterrence, US President Donald Trump repeatedly undercuts it through erratic decisions and transactional diplomacy. This dissonance not only weakens the US’ credibility abroad — it also fractures public trust within Taiwan. For decades,
In 1976, the Gang of Four was ousted. The Gang of Four was a leftist political group comprising Chinese Communist Party (CCP) members: Jiang Qing (江青), its leading figure and Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) last wife; Zhang Chunqiao (張春橋); Yao Wenyuan (姚文元); and Wang Hongwen (王洪文). The four wielded supreme power during the Cultural Revolution (1966-1976), but when Mao died, they were overthrown and charged with crimes against China in what was in essence a political coup of the right against the left. The same type of thing might be happening again as the CCP has expelled nine top generals. Rather than a
Former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmaker Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) on Saturday won the party’s chairperson election with 65,122 votes, or 50.15 percent of the votes, becoming the second woman in the seat and the first to have switched allegiance from the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) to the KMT. Cheng, running for the top KMT position for the first time, had been termed a “dark horse,” while the biggest contender was former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), considered by many to represent the party’s establishment elite. Hau also has substantial experience in government and in the KMT. Cheng joined the Wild Lily Student
Taipei stands as one of the safest capital cities the world. Taiwan has exceptionally low crime rates — lower than many European nations — and is one of Asia’s leading democracies, respected for its rule of law and commitment to human rights. It is among the few Asian countries to have given legal effect to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant of Social Economic and Cultural Rights. Yet Taiwan continues to uphold the death penalty. This year, the government has taken a number of regressive steps: Executions have resumed, proposals for harsher prison sentences
RSS