By Doug Young
REUTERS, HONG KONG
Google’s gambit in pulling the plug on its flagship search engine in China leaves its remaining operations there exposed to the whimsy of Beijing, whose initial reaction is far from reassuring.
Google plans to maintain an advertising sales force as well as its large research and development operations in China, but risks losing market share, revenue and staff to rivals including market leader Baidu, up-and-comer Tencent and US heavyweight Microsoft.
Opportunities to develop and market its Android and Chrome operating systems for cellphones and PCs in China could also be threatened, a potential setback for partners such as handset makers Dell and Lenovo.
“There’s no doubt the Chinese might make life difficult for Google,” said Vivek Couto, an analyst at Media Partners Asia. “But they don’t want to go directly after them. China also has to be a bit cautious.”
Google’s decision to shut its Chinese portal and reroute searches to its Hong Kong-based site to avoid the self-censorship Beijing demands was seen more as an escalation than a compromise in the two-month old dispute.
Though tensions could ease after an initial round of finger-pointing, the uncertainty and need for Beijing’s tolerance, if not support, threaten Google’s prospects in the world’s largest Internet market.
Initial indications that Google’s gambit was getting a chilly reception came from the official Xinhua news agency, which cited an unnamed official calling the move “totally wrong” and in violation of Google’s written promises.
In direct terms, Google may have to give up some or all of its revenue derived from China’s search market, depending on whether its advertisers follow it to its redirected China site at google.com.hk.
Analyst estimates of Google’s annual revenue in China range from US$300 million to roughly US$600 million, a small portion of its US$24 billion in annual revenue.
Other stakeholders exposed to Google’s actions include cellphone makers like Dell and Lenovo, which are both developing Android-based phones for China, as well as the hundreds of people who independently sell ads and develop software for Google’s products.
Spokeswomen at Lenovo and China Mobile, which is planning to offer the Dell Android phones on its network, had no immediate comment.
Meanwhile, other search sites operators stand ready to benefit most form Google’s withdrawal, most notably Baidu — which has 60 percent of China’s search market — and others such as fast-growing Tencent, analysts said.
“It will benefit everybody in China, but the obvious immediate beneficiary will be Baidu,” said CLSA analyst Elinor Leung (梁向奕). Microsoft, which has launched a beta version of its Bing search site in China, could also pick up market share, she added.
Other Web players could benefit as well if Google decides to use them as a back-door strategy to invest in China’s Internet market. Yahoo used a similar strategy after abandoning its own efforts in China in favor of buying 40 percent of leading China e-commerce operator Alibaba Group.
Despite the potential for collateral damage, observers and those who work for Google were cautiously optimistic that the current conflict wouldn’t spiral out of control, saying such escalation was in no one’s interest.
Google’s interest in the market is already clear.
But China also has an interest in placating Western governments that have been critical of its heavy-handed approach to media control and civil rights. China also needs major global tech firms like Google to develop its own domestic industries so they can someday compete on the global stage.
“If Google leaves its R&D unit in its current headquarters in Beijing ... the staff will remain, so I think our activities will continue,” said Arthur Wang (王開源), chairman of Beijing Google Technology User Group, one of Google’s largest software development groups.
Advertisers could take a more cautious approach until they see if traffic to Google’s Hong Kong site catering to mainland Chinese Web surfers gets the same traffic as its shuttered China site, said Kaiser Kuo (郭怡廣), a China-based technology commentator.
“Buying on a redirected site that could be at any moment blocked is a risky strategy,” he said. “So I think people are going to read the tea leaves and see what the government is going to do in this situation before making any commitments.”
Edward Yu (于揚), an analyst at China research firm Analysys, was confident Google could continue to operate effectively in China.
“In the short term, some officials may be upset about Google rerouting its operations,” he said. “But when things cool down, I think the other part of their operations are not affected as long as they comply with the regulations,” he said.
ADDITIONAL REPORTING BY MELANIE LEE, MICHAEL WEI AND KEVIN SOH
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS