Taiwan’s birth rate is dropping like a stone, and is now the lowest in the world. If nothing is done, the population will age and the long-term consequences would cause drastic national problems. The Ministry of the Interior has announced a competition to come up with a slogan that will encourage people to have children. It has caused quite a stir, but most people are joking about it rather than making serious suggestions.
Many of the slogans suggested by Internet users are ridiculing the idea of slogan-induced birth rates. Anyone who believes a NT$1 million (US$31,500) reward will produce a slogan that will make people want to have children just by hearing it, and that a single slogan can reverse a major social trend, is being a bit too simplistic.
Government agencies have already come up with innumerable policies — birth subsidies, educational allowances and pregnancy and maternity leave — to encourage people to have children, but Taiwanese birth rates still remain the world’s lowest. These policies have been ineffective because the government has not always implemented them, while industry has not given its full support and the general public has not fully accepted them.
If we look at the government’s implementation of the maternity leave policy as an example, business has not cooperated even though the government issued a legal order. Pregnant workers do not trust that they can return to their jobs after going on maternity leave. The result is that the law looked good, but is rarely applied. When even policy and legal decisions are useless, what good will a slogan do?
The population issue is a serious problem, but the ministry’s slogan concept will remain a quaint news report. The focus should instead be on the fact that low birth rates are a general trend in the post-industrial world. European countries, for example, have many policies to promote childbirth, but birth rates remain low. The results of Taiwan’s family planning may have surpassed those of other countries in the past, but given that the problem of low birthrates has been developing for years, it should have been easy to foresee that subsidies would be necessary to promote population growth.
The problem is not one of slogans, and the results of preferential policies have been limited. Falling population numbers have already become an unstoppable trend, and so it becomes necessary to find the real causes behind it. This is more important than any slogan.
In modern society both husband and wife must work, bringing in two salaries to pay the cost of bringing up children, educating them and paying for the family’s medical bills, often across at least three generations. The childcare system is insufficient at best and nonexistent or unrealistically expensive at worst. Many companies do not accept maternity leave. The economy is sluggish. Unemployment figures, housing prices and divorce rates are high. The natural environment is deteriorating at an alarming rate with no indication that anything will be done about it. The public has no enthusiasm for the country’s future. With so many problems in need of a solution, it is only natural that people think twice before having children.
The ministry’s approach to the low birth rate issue is a direct copy of President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) rule by propaganda and slogan.
The authorities are avoiding the real issues and hope to divert the focus with slick advertising and cute slogans. They are doing nothing to facilitate a real solution, while the public once again sees through it all to the government’s “impotence.”
Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, was “amazed” and “enthralled” by Chinese who rise at 3am for work. He praised it as a manifestation of talent and a good work ethic. Truthfully, that praise and statement about China, no matter its motivation, is nothing more than a round of applause for the atrocities inflicted by dictators and the spiritual anesthesia of their victims. “There’s just a lot of super-talented, hard-working people in China that strongly believe in manufacturing,” Musk said in an interview with the Financial Times on Tuesday. “And they won’t just be burning the midnight oil, they’ll be
“There’s going to be a new world order out there, and we’ve got to lead it,” US President Joe Biden said after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine upended global geopolitics. Far from Earth, that transition is already happening. Just like in the era of Sputnik and Apollo more than half a century ago, world leaders are again racing to achieve dominance in outer space — but there is one big difference: Whereas the US and the Soviet Union hashed out a common set of rules at the UN, this time around the world’s top superpowers cannot even agree on basic principles to govern
With a Taiwan contingency increasingly more plausible, Taiwanese lobbies in Japan are calling for the government to pass a version of the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), emulating the US precedent. Such a measure would surely enable Tokyo to make formal and regular contact with Taipei for dialogue, consultation, policy coordination and planning in military security. This would fill the missing link of the trilateral US-Japan-Taiwan security ties, rendering a US military defense of Taiwan more feasible through the support of the US-Japan alliance. Yet, particular caution should be exercised, as Beijing would probably view the move as a serious challenge to
As the Soviet Union was collapsing in the late 1980s and Russia seemed to be starting the process of democratization, 36-year-old US academic Francis Fukuyama had the audacity to assert that the world was at the “end of history.” Fukuyama claimed that democratic systems would become the norm, and peace would prevail the world over. He published a grandiose essay, “The End of History?” in the summer 1989 edition of the journal National Interest. Overnight, Fukuyama became a famous theorist in the US, western Europe, Japan and even Taiwan. Did the collapse of the Soviet Union mark the end of an era as