The number three bus in Riga winds from the mouth of the river Daugava, past the lovely old center of the city, to the miles of Lego-brick, Soviet-era blocks in Plavnieki. At the foot of one of them, Natalija is sitting at one table and Maksimam at another in the Tris Pelmeni cafe, eating herring with onions and drinking beer while ice melts down the windows and the radio relays a highly charged ice-hockey game between Dinamo Riga and Ska St Petersburg. Old ladies pick through the snow with shopping, men rummage through rubbish bins and boys with shaven heads fly the Russian flag from cars screeching through the slush.
This weekend, there was also a widespread sense of anger. In this ethnic Russian suburb of the Latvian capital, there was disbelief at the prospect of a commemoration to be held on Tuesday by veterans and supporters of the Latvian Legion of the wartime SS.
Natalija’s uncle “was killed by the fascists,” she says, yet “still the Latvians allow a parade of the SS of Adolf Hitler!”
Maksimam, younger, hunches the collar of his leather jacket, sips his drink and says he cares little what the old people get up to — but spits at the idea of an SS ceremony.
In a nod to ethnic allegiance, he is supporting St Petersburg in the ice-hockey contest against his home town. Many of his fellow ethnic Russians, who form the majority in the capital but a minority nationwide, are doing the same.
A few kilometers away in the city center, rows of young Latvians greet the end of the match, a sensational 3-1 away win for Riga, at the Folk Klubs Ala, with beers and cheers for a stab at the Russian foe on his own terrain.
Here the view of Tuesday’s controversial commemoration is very different. A boy called Uldis thinks “it’s correct to allow those who fought for Latvia to honor the dead.” The idea they were Nazis is “bullshit — they were defending our country.”
Battered by recession and emerging from the harshest winter in 30 years, Riga is bitterly divided over an annual commemoration that has also become an international controversy.
Ever since the British Tory leader David Cameron pulled his party out of the center-right coalition in the European parliament to align his members alongside right-wingers such as Latvia’s Fatherland and Freedom, which helps organize the SS event, an unexpected spotlight has shone on this corner of eastern Europe.
The UK’s foreign secretary, David Miliband, has called such links “sickening.” The Tory chairman, Eric Pickles, has accused critics of recycling “old Soviet smears” about the Latvians. And the annual SS veterans’ march has become for many a disturbing symbol of right-wing extremism within the EU.
The ramifications of the row that electrified British politics and Brussels have now been felt in Riga. Tuesday’s events were banned by the courts — citing security reasons — at the behest of the pro-Russian Harmony party which controls Riga.
“Although the legionnaires themselves decrease with time, the problem is increasing,” the party’s chairman, Janis Urbanovics, says. “After independence, this country became so preoccupied with hating Russia that it is not coming to terms with what happened during German occupation. We need that in order to draw a line under the past.”
Juris Dobelis, a parliamentary deputy for the Fatherland and Freedom party, said he would be there in defiance of the ban.
“A soldier is a soldier and all soldiers are equal,” says Dobelis. The units that fought here “were young men of 19 mobilized to fight other young men 19 years old. If politicians want to make speeches about that, it’s not our concern. We have seen commemorations in London and Moscow — this is ours.” The Latvian Legion fought, he insists, “for the liberation of Latvia from the Soviet Union,” and in support of the Wermacht “as liberators only for a moment.”
Therefore, “we will go as a party,” says Dobelis, a man with a manner of iron, “with veterans of 90 years old, to church at 10am. After church we go to the monument and by afternoon we shall be 70km away at the Lestana cemetery” — where the SS dead are buried.
Janis Atis Krumins’ father was an SS legionnaire and he said he would be there, too. Krumins is a member of Daugava Vanagi — Hawk of the Daugava — founded in 1945 by 12,000 legionnaires in a British POW camp at Zedelgem in Belgium “to support the veterans and families of the dead, scattered into exile during Soviet occupation,” says Krumins.
The commemoration provokes anger, Krumins says, “because whoever wins the war is considered to be in the right. Justice belongs to the victor, and the Soviet victor’s history demands that legionnaires be considered war criminals, the Red Army as heroes. For the Russians, whoever fights against communism is a fascist.”
Their gesture was contested on the streets and at a conference — addressed on Sunday by the director of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, Efraim Zuroff — by Latvia’s Anti-Fascist Committee, LAK. LAK was founded by a beekeeper named Josepf Koren, who describes himself as “not Russian but Jewish and born anti-communist” after his and his wife’s family were persecuted by the Soviets.
“We don’t say all veterans are war criminals,” says Koren, “but at least 25 percent of the Latvian Legion were recruited from the Latvian police who were involved in the murder of Jews and other Latvians, and the SS Legion should not be permitted a celebration of itself in the center of our city.”
This event has become a political football in contemporary Latvia — a young country bitterly and deeply divided between ethnic Latvian and Russian communities and political parties — on all sides, even among Tuesday’s mourners:
“The Second World War is with us today,” says Mr Dobelis. “We have many senior former officers of the KGB and Red Army living in Latvia.”
The country’s foremost public historian, Valters Nollendorfs, has problems with both sides of the argument, defending the Legion as distinct from the Third Reich but chastising Latvian politicians “for not coming to terms with the Holocaust.”
“The elite that runs this country knows that people who volunteered or were drafted by the Germans were among the murderers of the Jews.” On the other hand, he says, “you cannot take away the context of a year of Soviet occupation. When does resistance to the Soviets end and collaboration with the Nazis begin?” Successive occupations “dealt a terrible blow to Latvia’s sense of being, pitting brother against brother, literally.”
Arturis Punte’s two grandfathers fought on opposite sides, one for the Legion, the other for the Red Army. Arturis calls himself “a Russian Latvian in Europe,” and it is a relief to meet him in a bistro for which he is translating the menu into Russian. Punte is a poet, but is best known in Latvia for his Orbita project, which became the first Russian arts group to win the Latvian literary medal.
“We try to translate between the cultures, literally and figuratively,” he says, “to forge an objective Latvian narrative we can all share. Both sides manufacture folklores of fake heroism based on bad history, and the ceremony of March 16 just reflects the fact that the establishment can’t say clearly what happened here — everyone is always looking for someone else to be the guilty ones in the traumas that this place has been through.”
In Riga, while the rest of Europe debates the danger of far-right extremism in the present, and the likes of Juris Dobelis commemorate a dubious past, the increasingly urgent priority is reconciliation.
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
On May 13, the Legislative Yuan passed an amendment to Article 6 of the Nuclear Reactor Facilities Regulation Act (核子反應器設施管制法) that would extend the life of nuclear reactors from 40 to 60 years, thereby providing a legal basis for the extension or reactivation of nuclear power plants. On May 20, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) legislators used their numerical advantage to pass the TPP caucus’ proposal for a public referendum that would determine whether the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant should resume operations, provided it is deemed safe by the authorities. The Central Election Commission (CEC) has
When China passed its “Anti-Secession” Law in 2005, much of the democratic world saw it as yet another sign of Beijing’s authoritarianism, its contempt for international law and its aggressive posture toward Taiwan. Rightly so — on the surface. However, this move, often dismissed as a uniquely Chinese form of legal intimidation, echoes a legal and historical precedent rooted not in authoritarian tradition, but in US constitutional history. The Chinese “Anti-Secession” Law, a domestic statute threatening the use of force should Taiwan formally declare independence, is widely interpreted as an emblem of the Chinese Communist Party’s disregard for international norms. Critics
RSS