Google recently announced without warning that it was considering withdrawing from the China market.
It said Chinese cyber criminals had compromised its Web site and tried to access the Gmail account details of certain Chinese dissidents.
Forgetting, for the time being, any direct implications of this, there is one particular aspect I would like to discuss.
The US and China are currently engaged in an economic dispute about the volume of cheap Chinese imports, which is forcing US companies to lay off workers.
The US government and some multinationals are very unhappy about the Chinese government’s conduct in this case. This dispute is only going to get more heated over the course of this year.
Against this backdrop, Taiwan’s government is pressing on with plans to sign an economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) with China, which will align Taiwan more closely with the Chinese economy.
This will get Taiwan embroiled in difficult economic disputes with other countries.
As Google was making its announcement, US journalist Gerald Posner posted a story online discussing a confidential FBI report about the threat to US national security by a Chinese cyber army.
According to the report, the 180,000-strong retinue of criminals had the cyber equivalent of weapons of mass destruction at their disposal.
It says the People’s Liberation Army has developed a network of more than 30,000 military cyber spies, plus more than 150,000 private-sector computer experts.
The Pentagon alone received more than 90,000 sophisticated systematic and combined attacks last year, and this figure doesn’t include attacks on other US government departments, energy suppliers or other commercial institutions of strategic importance.
In fact, many multinationals are coming close to losing their patience with China.
Early last month, the directors and representatives of more than 70 chambers of commerce and industry, including those based in the US, Canada, South Korea and Japan, signed a joint letter to Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) that objected to China’s attitude toward unfair competition.
It appears that Google is not alone in its frustration with China’s behavior.
Google does not have fixed investments in China, such as manufacturing plants or equipment. Its decision to leave China is based on considerations of market access alone.
Other companies may share Google’s scruples, but cannot make the decision to withdraw so lightly.
However, when those multinational companies that enthusiastically supported the idea of permanent most-favored-nation status for China become frustrated, and when this feeling of anger spills over to European, Japanese, Korean and Canadian companies, it’s not hard to see that the year ahead will see economic disputes breaking out between China and other countries.
If the government is blind to this situation and steps up integration with China, Taiwan may well find itself caught up in the economic dispute between China and the US.
China is even getting Taiwanese companies to sell Iran equipment that can be used in developing nuclear weapons.
This has prompted the EU to threaten action against Taiwan, and it is just the tip of the iceberg.
Will the government really continue to insist on continuing with this kind of economic suicide?
Lai I-chung is an executive member of Taiwan Thinktank.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) has created a dilemma that could soon cause him to be hoisted with his own petard, bringing his leadership of China to an end. His threatening rhetoric over the unification of Taiwan with China, in which he has said, “we are willing to draw blood if necessary,” has placed Xi in a corner. Xi is portrayed as a strong world leader, yet he has created a scenario for himself that most likely would have an unfavorable outcome. With the 20th National Congress of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) scheduled to convene this month, Xi cannot
The 77th session of the UN General Assembly opened on Sept. 13. More than 10 overseas Taiwanese organizations had submitted a petition to the UN secretary-general, protesting that 23.5 million Taiwanese are excluded from representation. As president of the Taiwan United Nations Alliance, I also submitted a letter to the UN, saying that Taiwanese should have the right to be represented under the name of Taiwan. The government has been asking its allies to support Taiwan’s entry into the UN, but under its official name, the Republic of China (ROC). Doing so would have involved the right to represent China, with
I was privileged to meet with many of Taiwan’s leaders and leading thinkers during a study tour visit in August. One theme I heard several times during that trip was that bad relations between the United States and China benefit Taiwan. At first thought, I empathize with the argument. After all, there is a troubling record of America’s leaders negotiating with Beijing over the heads of Taiwan’s leaders. For example, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt returned Taiwan to China after World War II. President Richard Nixon surprised Taiwan leaders with his 1972 trip to China. President Jimmy Carter unilaterally chose to normalize
Washington’s “one China” policy has not changed and the US does not take a position on Taiwan’s sovereignty issue, a US Department of State spokesperson has said. He said that this has been the principle of US policy toward Taiwan since 1979, and the policy has remained in effect. He also said that US Secretary of State Antony Blinken has privately made this clear to Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅). The US’ “one China” policy and China’s “one China” principle recognize China as the “representative of China.” The two diverge on the issue of Taiwan: Beijing asserts sovereignty
RSS