two recent editions of the Taipei Times had articles on how green buildings may save energy and resources (“Greening Asia’s buildings” Nov. 28, page 9, and “Living in a greener Big Apple,” Nov. 29, page 9). However, while the articles reported on some interesting developments and made a good economic argument for efficient buildings, descriptions of new ideas coming from science and engineering were a bit thin on the ground (this being a rather nice pun for a lack of insulation).
As buildings account for about one-third of global energy use, improving their resource and energy performance is critical to achieve sustainability. I teach all my students that we should imitate nature’s solutions to get us out of the environmental mess. For example, nature recycles 100 percent of all materials and uses only solar energy. Imitating that would go a long way toward solving many environmental problems.
Forward-looking architects, designers and engineers have started doing exactly that, and they call it biomimicry — mimicking biological methods and systems to enhance the design of engineering systems and modern technology (a wonderful introduction to this emerging field is Janine Benyus’ book Biomimicry).
Mother Nature has had billions of years to evolve highly optimized and efficient solutions to its own engineering and design difficulties. Hence, nature is teeming with solutions to our environmental problems. Here’s an amazing example: Termites living in the African savanna somehow manage to keep their buildings, called mounds, at a constant temperature while outside temperatures fluctuate wildly. How do they do it?
They constantly open and close a series of heating and cooling vents throughout the mound over the course of the day, and this ingenious system of air current regulation has now been imitated in several modern buildings, reducing energy costs by up to 90 percent (search Internet for “termites Eastgate” and “Portcullis House”).
But so-called bionic buildings go much further: They use intelligent design to reduce the use of materials (think the Eiffel tower and its skeleton-like structure) or to respond smartly to a changing environment (think Taipei 101 and its wind and earthquake damper).
Bionic buildings, like the termite mounds, react to outside heat, cold or wind by changing internal air currents, shading or opening windows, or recycling water continuously through internal gardens that clean the water, stabilize internal temperature and improve air quality (search Internet for “bionic building”).
In the future, truly responsive buildings would gather all residual compressive loads into a single mast and then respond to changes in internal and external forces by adaptively changing their state of prestress, giving extreme lightweight stability (www.bath.ac.uk/mech-eng/biomimetics/).
Further ideas include making tougher cement with less energy (search Internet for “Roman concrete”) and self-cleaning walls and windows (www.treehugger.com/files/2005/09/sto_lotusan_bio.php).
However, unused building surfaces are actually a wasted resource and should instead be covered either with solar panels or with plants.
So-called green roofs have many benefits: They decrease storm water and urban heat, improve the building’s insulation, water and air quality, and provide habitat for plants and animals and a place for people to relax.
Renowned architect William McDonough even planned to harvest food on the roofs of the planned model village of Huangbaiyu in China, but unfortunately construction seems to have stalled.
Imagine how greening Taipei’s roofs would convert most of the city’s surface from cold, dead concrete to living, breathing plants — what a difference this would make to the quality of life.
New buildings can now be designed to use almost no energy or to even feed energy into the electricity grid.
Naturally, some of these ideas presented here can only be implemented in new buildings, but old buildings can still be retrofitted to make them more energy-efficient, non-toxic and recycling-friendly. Retrofitted buildings are better for the inhabitants, the environment and the resale price.
An excellent report called Energy Saving Measures for Taiwan’s Built Environment details how already available technologies and strategies can improve the energy efficiency of existing and new buildings by at least 30 percent.
Architects, designers and engineers should take note of these developments, and governments should urgently pass building and retrofitting standards and then subsidize their implementation.
People should demand to live in enjoyable houses that will also sustain their children’s future. And given we spend most of our time indoors now, nothing can enhance quality of life more than using nature’s tricks and services to build sustainable houses and cities.
Bruno Walther is a visiting assistant professor of environmental science at the College of Public Health and Nutrition, Taipei Medical University.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS