two recent editions of the Taipei Times had articles on how green buildings may save energy and resources (“Greening Asia’s buildings” Nov. 28, page 9, and “Living in a greener Big Apple,” Nov. 29, page 9). However, while the articles reported on some interesting developments and made a good economic argument for efficient buildings, descriptions of new ideas coming from science and engineering were a bit thin on the ground (this being a rather nice pun for a lack of insulation).
As buildings account for about one-third of global energy use, improving their resource and energy performance is critical to achieve sustainability. I teach all my students that we should imitate nature’s solutions to get us out of the environmental mess. For example, nature recycles 100 percent of all materials and uses only solar energy. Imitating that would go a long way toward solving many environmental problems.
Forward-looking architects, designers and engineers have started doing exactly that, and they call it biomimicry — mimicking biological methods and systems to enhance the design of engineering systems and modern technology (a wonderful introduction to this emerging field is Janine Benyus’ book Biomimicry).
Mother Nature has had billions of years to evolve highly optimized and efficient solutions to its own engineering and design difficulties. Hence, nature is teeming with solutions to our environmental problems. Here’s an amazing example: Termites living in the African savanna somehow manage to keep their buildings, called mounds, at a constant temperature while outside temperatures fluctuate wildly. How do they do it?
They constantly open and close a series of heating and cooling vents throughout the mound over the course of the day, and this ingenious system of air current regulation has now been imitated in several modern buildings, reducing energy costs by up to 90 percent (search Internet for “termites Eastgate” and “Portcullis House”).
But so-called bionic buildings go much further: They use intelligent design to reduce the use of materials (think the Eiffel tower and its skeleton-like structure) or to respond smartly to a changing environment (think Taipei 101 and its wind and earthquake damper).
Bionic buildings, like the termite mounds, react to outside heat, cold or wind by changing internal air currents, shading or opening windows, or recycling water continuously through internal gardens that clean the water, stabilize internal temperature and improve air quality (search Internet for “bionic building”).
In the future, truly responsive buildings would gather all residual compressive loads into a single mast and then respond to changes in internal and external forces by adaptively changing their state of prestress, giving extreme lightweight stability (www.bath.ac.uk/mech-eng/biomimetics/).
Further ideas include making tougher cement with less energy (search Internet for “Roman concrete”) and self-cleaning walls and windows (www.treehugger.com/files/2005/09/sto_lotusan_bio.php).
However, unused building surfaces are actually a wasted resource and should instead be covered either with solar panels or with plants.
So-called green roofs have many benefits: They decrease storm water and urban heat, improve the building’s insulation, water and air quality, and provide habitat for plants and animals and a place for people to relax.
Renowned architect William McDonough even planned to harvest food on the roofs of the planned model village of Huangbaiyu in China, but unfortunately construction seems to have stalled.
Imagine how greening Taipei’s roofs would convert most of the city’s surface from cold, dead concrete to living, breathing plants — what a difference this would make to the quality of life.
New buildings can now be designed to use almost no energy or to even feed energy into the electricity grid.
Naturally, some of these ideas presented here can only be implemented in new buildings, but old buildings can still be retrofitted to make them more energy-efficient, non-toxic and recycling-friendly. Retrofitted buildings are better for the inhabitants, the environment and the resale price.
An excellent report called Energy Saving Measures for Taiwan’s Built Environment details how already available technologies and strategies can improve the energy efficiency of existing and new buildings by at least 30 percent.
Architects, designers and engineers should take note of these developments, and governments should urgently pass building and retrofitting standards and then subsidize their implementation.
People should demand to live in enjoyable houses that will also sustain their children’s future. And given we spend most of our time indoors now, nothing can enhance quality of life more than using nature’s tricks and services to build sustainable houses and cities.
Bruno Walther is a visiting assistant professor of environmental science at the College of Public Health and Nutrition, Taipei Medical University.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS