Typhoon Morakot unleashed record rainfall on the south and wrought the worst damage of any typhoon in the past 50 years. Areas of Pingtung County affected by land subsidence — in which the land sinks below sea level — that had never flooded before ended up under water.
Flooding is a very real risk for areas affected by land subsidence and residents in these areas should have been aware of this. Flooding in upstream areas of Pingtung County was caused by a buildup of water that could not be naturally redirected into the ocean in time, which had dire consequences.
Apart from the record rainfall, there were two main reasons for the flooding. First, poor upstream soil conservation meant that the land was unable to absorb the rainwater effectively. Second, downstream, sea walls that had been built in the hope of protecting areas affected by land subsidence actually impeded the drainage of floodwater.
Many coastal areas are affected by land subsidence and the next time Taiwan experiences record rainfall, a similar disaster could occur.
I visited Pingtung in April for a forum on water management. While there, I noticed that many water control projects were under way in the area, such as increasing the height of sea walls, building pumping stations, widening drains, building underground reservoirs, recharging groundwater and conducting lowland afforestation.
These measures will only be effective for approximately 30 years and the aim is to minimize the amount of damage done by floods during those 30 years. However, the real problem is that residents are willing to put up with floods a few days out of a year but unwilling to leave areas affected by land subsidence.
For example, one residential building too close to the Chiang Yuan pumping station floods every time it rains. Other houses in the area have had special pumps installed.
Current strategies for water control are merely aimed at solving today’s problems because residents are unwilling to leave flood-affected areas, while the problems that make these areas susceptible to floods are getting worse.
For example, land subsidence in Linbian (林邊) and Jiadong (佳冬) townships, which are crammed full of cultivation farms, is on average 3m per century. Combined with the possibility that sea levels could rise 1m in the future, it has been estimated that land in these areas could drop another 3m between next year and 2040.
Land subsidence will continue to be a problem. Water control measures aim to solve local floods but do not solve the broader problems posed by inclement weather over large areas. The combination of these two realities means rescue work will become more important than water control projects as more areas sink below sea level.
The best way to adapt to these problems would be to make plans for Linbian and Jiadong townships for 30 years from now and to cooperate with the townships.
Since we cannot stop land subsidence in these areas, we should look at ways to relocate people from areas that will clearly continue to suffer from land subsidence over the next 30 years. We should also remove sea walls that are no longer necessary to allow excess water to flow freely into the ocean.
If we can meet these challenges, we could perhaps slow down the pace of land subsidence over the next 30 years and help minimize future disasters caused by heavy rainstorms.
Liu Chung-ming is director of the Global Change Research Center at National Taiwan University.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS