Contrary to what President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) would have us believe, Taiwan’s breakthroughs and successes at home and abroad are not always contingent on Beijing’s “goodwill.”
An example of this is the ongoing World Police and Fire Games in Vancouver — where the Taiwanese team is participating under the name “Taiwan” rather than “Chinese Taipei,” the usual formulation at international events — which were first held in 1985. At the opening ceremony on Friday, the Republic of China flag was on full display and drew loud cheers from the audience.
The National Police Agency said that its persistent requests and those of Taiwan’s representative office in Vancouver, as well as the goodwill of the host country — Canada — helped to achieve the use of the name “Taiwan” at the Games. This shows that when the conditions are right, Taiwan can make its presence abroad felt and can do so with dignity.
The event Web site says that to be eligible to compete at the Games, participants must be law enforcement or firefighting personnel employed by “any duly organized governmental sub-division, such as municipal, provincial/state, national, etc.” On Monday, the National Police Agency said in a press release that Taiwan’s 49-member team was organized by the National Police Agency and the National Fire Agency, which means Taiwan’s eligibility had been assessed on a national basis.
Some factors that made this possible include the fact that the Games are being held in Canada, a liberal democracy that, under the administration of Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper, has shown an occasional willingness to upset Beijing. The large and influential Taiwanese community in British Columbia probably played a role as well.
This contrasts with venues where Beijing has more political clout, such as the World Games in Kaohsiung last month and the Asian Martial Arts Games that opened in Bangkok on Saturday. Given that China is Thailand’s second-largest trade partner (bilateral trade was estimated at US$41 billion in 2007) and given its membership in ASEAN, which by next year is expected to become China’s third-largest trade partner (trade between China and ASEAN countries was US$231 billion last year), it is obvious that even if the organizers of the Martial Arts Games wanted to show goodwill to the Taiwanese team, their hands would be tied by Beijing.
Bilateral trade between Canada and China last year, meanwhile, was estimated at US$34.52 billion, less than that between Thailand and China and lagging far behind the US$560 billion US-Canada bilateral figure for 2007. As such, Beijing’s ability to influence Canada on its own turf is far less than that in Thailand.
This situation should be noted by Taiwanese who endeavor to increase the nation’s image abroad, as it could serve as an indicator for fights that are winnable and those that should be avoided. In areas where Chinese political and economic influence is minimal, and where the Taiwanese community has little influence, efforts to secure Taiwanese dignity by having teams participate as “Taiwan” should be avoided. When the conditions are ripe, however — and Vancouver is a perfect example — Taiwanese and their supporters should go all out to ensure that the nation’s colors are displayed proudly.
Judging by the warm welcome the team received on Friday, there are a lot of people out there rooting for a dignified Taiwan.
Despite the complicated legacy of colonialism, relations between Taipei and Tokyo continue to blossom in these troubled times. As East Asia continues to battle the COVID-19 pandemic and struggles to contain an increasingly aggressive China, our democratic archipelago benefits from a new high in its security relations with Japan. Remarkably, with its generous vaccine diplomacy and the unprecedented explicit mention of the situation surrounding Taiwan in Japan’s annual defense white paper, Tokyo began to embrace a novel, two-track, comprehensive approach for engaging Taiwan. The first track deals with non-traditional security such as public health and vaccine donations. Japan has generously supported
As the incursions by China into Taiwan’s air defense identification zone intensify, the international community’s anxiety has risen over the question of whether the US military would become directly involved in the case of an attack on Taiwan. Washington’s long-held policy of “strategic ambiguity” does little to ease the trepidation. The rationale universally espoused on “strategic ambiguity” is that an announced commitment from Washington to directly defend Taiwan would encourage Taiwanese independence and consequently bring forth a Chinese military attack and a possible nuclear confrontation between two superpowers. However, this line of argument could soon lose steam if the subject is viewed from
Having deceived the world about its nuclear capabilities while preparing for an arms race, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is now using its increasing nuclear forces for virtual nuclear coercion. This new threat will continue until the United States, Japan, and Taiwan can restore the CCP’s sense of fear. This dynamic is a familiar one for Taiwan. As the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) capabilities have grown, its inhibitions about conducting larger and more frequent coercive military demonstrations have shrunk. The PLA now more openly practices for the destruction of Taiwan’s democracy and the murder of its citizens. In the nuclear realm,
In an unprecedented move, a group of democratic nations led by the US, UK and EU in a joint statement on Tuesday accused the Chinese Ministry of State Security of having carried out a major cyberattack earlier this year and stealing data from at least 30,000 organizations worldwide, including governments, universities and firms in key industries. Western officials were reportedly perplexed by the attack’s brazen execution and unparalleled scale. In an article on the attack, BBC security correspondent Gordon Corera wrote: “Western spies are still struggling to understand why Chinese behavior has changed.” The attack raises the fear “that they [China]