Asleep at the wheel
Dear Johnny,
So it’s my fault that the Neihu Line is so difficult for disabled passengers and the like. We should wait until all other passengers get on first, and if there’s space left, then those with kids can board. Mr “Sensible Commuter’s” comments make people with children and wheelchairs second-class citizens (Johnny Neihu’s Mailbag, July 18, page 8).
Let me clarify. We didn’t decide to take the MRT that day to “try” it. We had been invited to the Miramar mall for a birthday party. Since we had no problems getting there with the MRT, how could we have imagined what a disaster it would be on the way back?
We had let an earlier train go by that was filled to capacity and only able to accommodate four passengers and a giant wheelchair that was shoved in.
All I was trying to say was that for the passengers that have to use the line at peak hours, it will be a daily inconvenience — because of Taipei Mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌) and President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) handling of the project.
Last Saturday we took the Neihu Line again, and I was more than happy to see that eight staff had been dispatched to monitor each platform, or a total of 16 — two for each door! So the Taipei City Government eventually fixed a tiny part of a huge problem.
Too bad, though, that Ma and others refuse to take responsibility for this mess, or for the Maokong Gondola debacle. The Control Yuan ought to do something about it, but it’s sleeping at the wheel.
Since becoming a father, I’ve realized that it is harder to decide what is best for children than for an adult. So again, Johnny, I must say it is my fault for having children and that the Neihu Line is so mafan.
Maybe I should just visit a water park like the one you mentioned last week (“Struggling to stay above the pee-line,” July 18, page 8) and see the sad, shitty parts of the city’s outskirts. Then I’ll be able to rejoice at all the goodness the inner city has to offer.
HARRY ADAMOPOULOS
Taipei
Johnny replies: Look, Harry, if it’s any consolation, I am sure you and Sensible Commuter would get on just fine if you met in the real world.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS