Asleep at the wheel
Dear Johnny,
So it’s my fault that the Neihu Line is so difficult for disabled passengers and the like. We should wait until all other passengers get on first, and if there’s space left, then those with kids can board. Mr “Sensible Commuter’s” comments make people with children and wheelchairs second-class citizens (Johnny Neihu’s Mailbag, July 18, page 8).
Let me clarify. We didn’t decide to take the MRT that day to “try” it. We had been invited to the Miramar mall for a birthday party. Since we had no problems getting there with the MRT, how could we have imagined what a disaster it would be on the way back?
We had let an earlier train go by that was filled to capacity and only able to accommodate four passengers and a giant wheelchair that was shoved in.
All I was trying to say was that for the passengers that have to use the line at peak hours, it will be a daily inconvenience — because of Taipei Mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌) and President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) handling of the project.
Last Saturday we took the Neihu Line again, and I was more than happy to see that eight staff had been dispatched to monitor each platform, or a total of 16 — two for each door! So the Taipei City Government eventually fixed a tiny part of a huge problem.
Too bad, though, that Ma and others refuse to take responsibility for this mess, or for the Maokong Gondola debacle. The Control Yuan ought to do something about it, but it’s sleeping at the wheel.
Since becoming a father, I’ve realized that it is harder to decide what is best for children than for an adult. So again, Johnny, I must say it is my fault for having children and that the Neihu Line is so mafan.
Maybe I should just visit a water park like the one you mentioned last week (“Struggling to stay above the pee-line,” July 18, page 8) and see the sad, shitty parts of the city’s outskirts. Then I’ll be able to rejoice at all the goodness the inner city has to offer.
HARRY ADAMOPOULOS
Taipei
Johnny replies: Look, Harry, if it’s any consolation, I am sure you and Sensible Commuter would get on just fine if you met in the real world.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS