Asleep at the wheel
Dear Johnny,
So it’s my fault that the Neihu Line is so difficult for disabled passengers and the like. We should wait until all other passengers get on first, and if there’s space left, then those with kids can board. Mr “Sensible Commuter’s” comments make people with children and wheelchairs second-class citizens (Johnny Neihu’s Mailbag, July 18, page 8).
Let me clarify. We didn’t decide to take the MRT that day to “try” it. We had been invited to the Miramar mall for a birthday party. Since we had no problems getting there with the MRT, how could we have imagined what a disaster it would be on the way back?
We had let an earlier train go by that was filled to capacity and only able to accommodate four passengers and a giant wheelchair that was shoved in.
All I was trying to say was that for the passengers that have to use the line at peak hours, it will be a daily inconvenience — because of Taipei Mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌) and President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) handling of the project.
Last Saturday we took the Neihu Line again, and I was more than happy to see that eight staff had been dispatched to monitor each platform, or a total of 16 — two for each door! So the Taipei City Government eventually fixed a tiny part of a huge problem.
Too bad, though, that Ma and others refuse to take responsibility for this mess, or for the Maokong Gondola debacle. The Control Yuan ought to do something about it, but it’s sleeping at the wheel.
Since becoming a father, I’ve realized that it is harder to decide what is best for children than for an adult. So again, Johnny, I must say it is my fault for having children and that the Neihu Line is so mafan.
Maybe I should just visit a water park like the one you mentioned last week (“Struggling to stay above the pee-line,” July 18, page 8) and see the sad, shitty parts of the city’s outskirts. Then I’ll be able to rejoice at all the goodness the inner city has to offer.
HARRY ADAMOPOULOS
Taipei
Johnny replies: Look, Harry, if it’s any consolation, I am sure you and Sensible Commuter would get on just fine if you met in the real world.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS