The government’s plan to sign a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with China will have an impact on the nation’s financial security mechanism and confidential business information on capital flows between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait.
Former Financial Supervisory Commission chairman Shih Jun-ji (施俊吉) has expressed his opinion on the matter, saying that “every issued loan is a risk to financial institutions” and asking how the government would be able “identify the quality of risk for Taiwanese businesspeople in China.”
However, “for China,” Shih said, “the signing of an MOU will solve all problems.”
If Chinese financial institutions are allowed to set up a branch in Taiwan, they will be able to access all the credit data collected and systematized by the Joint Credit Information Center in Taiwan over many years.
If that happens, every Taiwanese-owned company in China that originated in Taiwan will have its financial information exposed.
Even more worrying is that China would be able to use this credit information to threaten or tempt some Taiwanese companies to engage in activities that could jeopardize Taiwan’s national security.
Strictly speaking, an MOU is not legally binding like an agreement or treaty. However, given that Taiwan and China have dedicated time and effort to negotiate and sign an MOU, both parties are likely to closely observe the regulations and provisions listed in the MOU.
Some people have proposed imposing restrictions on the use of credit data be introduced in the MOU. This, however, is a naive idea.
China has become an economic powerhouse that politically covets sovereignty over Taiwan’s territories, strongly opposes independence and is intent on promoting unification. Non-economic factors will inevitably become involved in what are purely financial or economic issues.
Furthermore, given the serious imbalance in cross-strait information transparency, investing in China would seem like an adventure into the unknown for Taiwanese financial institutions while Chinese financial companies receive a warm welcome from the administration of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) when they invest in Taiwan.
David Smick, a well-known international financial adviser who is well acquainted with the heads of central banks around the world, recently published a book entitled The World is Curved: Hidden Dangers to the Global Economy.
Smick says in the book that in the world of financial markets, the world is not flat, but curved.
He says we cannot see the dangers beyond the horizon because of the lack of financial market transparency, therefore we cannot always identify risks.
Smick writes that China’s attempt to combine a market economy with a Marxist regime is asking too much, and that while China is capable of bringing the world into a new era of prosperity, it could also drag us all into chaos.
The Ma government has always depended on Chinese measures as painkiller and aphrodisiac and given us the false impression that the establishment of a cross-strait mutual market will bring about prosperity.
Is the government fully aware of the serious repercussions of signing an MOU with China?
Hong Chi-chang is a former chairman of the Straits Exchange Foundation and a former Democratic Progressive Party legislator.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
Election seasons expose societal divisions and contrasting visions about the future of Taiwan. They also offer opportunities for leaders to forge unity around practical ideas for strengthening Taiwan’s resilience. Beijing has in the past sought to exacerbate divisions within Taiwan. For Beijing, a divided Taiwan is less likely to pursue permanent separation. It also is more manipulatable than a united Taiwan. A divided polity has lower trust in government institutions and diminished capacity to solve societal challenges. As my co-authors Richard Bush, Bonnie Glaser, and I recently wrote in our book US-Taiwan Relations: Will China’s Challenge Lead to a Crisis?, “Beijing wants
Taiwan has never had a president who is not from the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) or the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). Could next year’s presidential election put a third-party candidate in office? The contenders who have thrown their hats into the ring are Vice President William Lai (賴清德) of the DPP, New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) of the KMT and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲). A monthly poll released by my-formosa.com on Monday showed support for Hou nosediving from 26 percent to 18.3 percent, the lowest among the three presidential hopefuls. It was a surprising
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has nominated New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) as its candidate for next year’s presidential election. The selection process was replete with controversy, mainly because the KMT has never stipulated a set of protocols for its presidential nominations. Yet, viewed from a historical perspective, the KMT has improved to some extent. There are two fundamental differences between the KMT and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP): First, the DPP believes that the Republic of China on Taiwan is a sovereign country with independent autonomy, meaning that Taiwan and China are two different entities. The KMT, on the
The presidential election is to be held concurrently with the legislative elections in January next year. While former president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) administration was fraught with challenges, as he never commanded a legislative majority, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) did not have this problem. In her two terms in office, she has been able to carry out her vision and policies and thereby bear full responsibility for her performance. As a result, the public is not only waiting on tenterhooks to see the results of the presidential election, but also whether the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) will be able to hold
RSS