Once again, North Koreans led by Kim Jong-il have defied the international community and, as they have for much of the last 40 years, will evidently get away with it as the US, Japan, and South Korea have done little but talk and shake their fingers at the “Dear Leader.”
Last weekend, North Korea fired a rocket over Japan into the Pacific Ocean. For a North Korea that cannot feed itself, whose archaic industry is limping, whose trade is anemic except for imports from China, whose people suffer from endemic diseases and which goes dark for lack of electricity when the sun goes down, this was a spectacular achievement.
Kim went to the launch site on the east coast to watch the liftoff, then had himself reelected by acclamation. Midweek, Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) said, 100,000 people jammed a plaza in Pyongyang to celebrate.
“The DPRK [Democratic People’s Republic of Korea] succeeded in launching the satellite despite the enemies’ unprecedented political and military pressure,” KCNA said.
Before the missile launch, US President Barack Obama and leaders of other powerful countries warned North Korea not to proceed with the launch. Afterward, Obama said that North Korea “must be punished,” a position that was echoed in Tokyo, Seoul, Western Europe and at the UN.
By the weekend, however, little but nattering was seeping out of the UN, the White House and foreign ministries around the globe.
Moreover, the Obama administration imposed through the Pentagon a news blackout despite having erected an elaborate system of missile tracking radars, computers and communications in Japan, the Aleutians, Alaska, Hawaii, and California, US and Japanese warships at sea, and satellites above the Pacific Ocean. That cost the taxpayers? US$56 billion over the past seven years.
Colorado-based Northern Command, which is responsible for the defense of the US homeland, published a terse press release with few details, concluding: “This is all of the information that will be provided … pertaining to the launch.”
In contrast, after a missile defense test in December, the Pentagon produced Lieutenant General Patrick O’Reilly, Director of the Missile Defense Agency, to open a press briefing.
“What I would like to do is go over exactly what happened this afternoon,” he had said back then. The Army general proceeded to do just that.
In North Korea’s case, rather than inform the public the Pentagon is paid to defend, it withheld information and ostensibly did so for one or both of the following reasons:
First, the Obama administration, having decided there would be no response or retaliation for the defiant missile test, calculated that it would be best to divert public attention by ignoring it.
Second, something went wrong in tracking the North Korean missile in this first realistic test of missile defense; other tests have been staged. Rather than admit failure, the Pentagon deployed a smokescreen.
The North Korean missile test was but the latest act of a rogue state. In 1968, North Korea seized the US intelligence ship Pueblo in international waters; 36 hours later, North Korean commandos attempted to kill South Korean President Park Chung-hee. The following year, North Korea shot down a US EC-121 electronic surveillance plane, killing 31 Americans.
Since then, the North Koreans have mounted assassinations, abductions, bombings and illicit drug operations, all without drawing an effective response from the US, Japan, or South Korea. In the 1980s, Pyongyang began developing nuclear arms, which led to the Six-Party talks in 2003. The US, China, Japan, South Korea and Russia have sought, unsuccessfully, to dissuade Kim from pursuing his nuclear ambitions. In 2006, North Korea detonated a nuclear device. The-Six Party Talks are stalled and the launch suggests they will recede further into the horizon.
Richard Halloran is a freelance writer based in Hawaii.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
Taiwan is confronting escalating threats from its behemoth neighbor. Last month, the Chinese People’s Liberation Army conducted live-fire drills in the East China Sea, practicing blockades and precision strikes on simulated targets, while its escalating cyberattacks targeting government, financial and telecommunication systems threaten to disrupt Taiwan’s digital infrastructure. The mounting geopolitical pressure underscores Taiwan’s need to strengthen its defense capabilities to deter possible aggression and improve civilian preparedness. The consequences of inadequate preparation have been made all too clear by the tragic situation in Ukraine. Taiwan can build on its successful COVID-19 response, marked by effective planning and execution, to enhance
Since taking office, US President Donald Trump has upheld the core goals of “making America safer, stronger, and more prosperous,” fully implementing an “America first” policy. Countries have responded cautiously to the fresh style and rapid pace of the new Trump administration. The US has prioritized reindustrialization, building a stronger US role in the Indo-Pacific, and countering China’s malicious influence. This has created a high degree of alignment between the interests of Taiwan and the US in security, economics, technology and other spheres. Taiwan must properly understand the Trump administration’s intentions and coordinate, connect and correspond with US strategic goals.
RSS