President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and his administration have pinned almost everything that affects the nation’s future — military security, the economy and participation in international organizations — on China. Yet the number of Chinese visitors, the benefits of direct cross-strait transportation and exports to China have all fallen short of public expectations. With its sinking approval ratings, the Ma government is hoping China will help Taiwan secure observer status at the World Health Assembly (WHA) this year and thus remedy the situation.
Because the Chinese government promised to help in the joint communique issued by former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Lien Chan (連戰) and Chinese Communist Party Chairman Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) in 2005, the government is confident about the bid to join the WHA.
But some complications seem to have arisen.
During the 2003 SARS outbreak, some members of the pan-blue camp said Taiwan should seek the help of the WHO by going through Beijing. In March 2005, Lien visited Beijing, leading to a Lien-Hu joint communique that said the Chinese government would help Taiwan within the “one China” framework.
Two months later, China and the WHO signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) listing eight Taiwanese seaports as Chinese quarantine ports and stating that exchanges between Taiwan and the WHO should follow the “one China” principle and be approved by China.
This kind of participation is even worse than “one country, two systems” in Hong Kong.
The KMT’s response to the MOU was unexpected. Not long after it was signed, Chang Jung-kung (張榮恭), director of the KMT’s mainland affairs department, said he had obtained a copy of the MOU and supported it.
After Hu made a speech last year to commemorate the 30th anniversary of China’s “Message to Compatriots in Taiwan,” in which he made six proposals to promote peaceful cross-strait development, Chang commended Hu for coming up with solutions.
As long as “Taiwan achieves its goal to join the WHA, the public should not oppose it,” Chang said.
He said the KMT had achieved something the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) could never have achieved.
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs also boasted that the bid for WHA membership could succeed.
Recently, however, the Ma government’s readiness to accept Chinese arrangements has been challenged. On Mar. 31, the legislature’s Social Welfare and Environmental Hygiene Committee passed two bills proposed separately by DPP Legislator Huang Sue-ying (黃淑英) and KMT Legislator Ho Tsai-feng (侯彩鳳) that would restrict the government from accepting any arrangement with the WHO that could compromise Taiwan’s sovereignty.
This compelled Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs David Lin (林永樂) to promise that Taiwan would not accept participation in the WHA based on the framework stipulated in the MOU.
But that promise was worth little: On April 5, an official confirmed that the Department of Health had been given the password to access the International Health Regulations (IHR) information portal late last month, enabling Taiwan to contact the WHO directly.
The department said the process was based on the Olympic framework, when in fact it followed the Hong Kong/Macau model outlined in the MOU. Under the Olympic framework, Taiwan is considered an autonomous and independent member, but now Taiwan will be a point of contact, meaning that the nation falls under China’s membership rather than being a member of its own right. The government’s acceptance without protest ran counter to the bills.
The public may not know of the exchanges between Taiwan and the WHO through the IHR Event Information Site, but Ma’s promise that Taiwan would be able to participate in the WHA next month cannot be ignored, nor can this insult to Taiwan’s sovereignty.
This adds uncertainty to closed-door negotiations between the government and China regarding Taiwan’s WHA participation. If the government insisted on following public opinion as reflected by the legislature’s bills, Ma would be viewed by China as breaking his word and his efforts to curry favor with Beijing would be spoiled.
If Ma yielded to the Lien-Hu communique and the MOU signed in 2005, it could cause conflict between the legislature and the government.
Ma’s motto is: “Never be pleased with a good thing for too long.” This, despite his own optimism over Taiwan’s bid to join the WHA. His shameful concession to China on the nation’s sovereignty was completely unnecessary.
Interaction between people from different countries is increasingly frequent. If Taiwan were affected by an epidemic, the whole world would be threatened. This is why the US, Japan and other countries actively assist Taiwan when we ask for assistance in cases of international outbreaks of disease, despite resistance from China.
The US’ Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) are much better equipped to deal with a disease outbreak than the WHO.
The reason Taiwan wants WHO membership is that it does not want to keep relying on foreign assistance and to have its national dignity slighted. If accepting US assistance hurts Taiwan’s dignity, then there is even less reason to accept a solution based on the MOU that is a hundred times more damaging to national dignity.
Nevertheless, the KMT insists on setting a trap for itself and jumping in. Its preposterous strategy will soon leave Taiwan with no options at all.
Lin Cho-shui is a former Democratic Progressive Party legislator.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG AND DREW CAMERON
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS