Bikes need rules, too
I read with interest the article on postponing penalties for traffic violations by cyclists (“Taipei halts cyclist penalty plan,” March 18, page 2). The only thing I can say is that I hope this is not the end of the story. Rules controlling the growing number of cyclists in Taipei and increased awareness of courteous, responsible and safe riding are needed before it’s too late.
If officials back down from requiring that cyclists act courteously and responsibly on Taipei’s streets and bike paths, it will be another huge mistake for Taipei and society.
We all know that many places in Taiwan are nearly unlivable, almost hellish, because of the crazed motor vehicle culture that has long allowed — perhaps encouraged — motorists to drive in the most breathtakingly hazardous, irresponsible and impolite ways.
For a long time there was little or no enforcement of rules in these areas.
It seems to be improving a bit, but motorists have taken advantage of a largely lawless, take-no-prisoners milieu, and we all know what the results have been: clogged streets, rude behavior, dangerous thrill riding and flagrant defiance of traffic and vehicle laws. All of this has left visitors and citizens in Taipei and Taiwan shaking their heads in despair.
That Taipei is developing into a bicycle haven is something to be proud of. We cyclists hope we can seize the day and maybe drive a few of those nut-case Taipei motorists off the roads permanently.
But on a more positive note, I hope Taipei and its residents can improve the city’s bicycle environment and attitudes, and that past mistakes will not be repeated.
DAVID PENDERY
Taipei
Stop the insulting monikers
Rather than gradually being clarified in the West, Taiwan’s name — in terms of what title it should use overseas — is being muddied by repeated disinformation assaults.
When the Taipei Times reported that the overseas New7Wonders Web site lists Yushan as being in some country called “Chinese Taipei,” the geographical gaffe almost beggared belief (“Yushan park seeks Web ‘ambassadors,’” March 23, page 2).
For some international sporting events and the Olympics, Taiwan must use the unintelligible moniker of “Chinese Taipei,” mandated by certain international rules because of pressure from certain authorities.
But now some people overseas have been led to believe that Taiwan’s actual name is “Chinese Taipei.”
Don’t believe me? I recently received an e-mail from a well-known and well-traveled US public relations consultant in San Francisco, who, after I told her that Taiwan was not part of China but a separate, independent country, told me: “I understand your point that Taiwan is not part of China, but the official name of the country is, in fact, Chinese Taipei.”
She really wrote that.
Based on the example of this well-educated US woman’s misinformed knowledge of Taiwan, it would appear that there is much work to be done in telling the world what this nation is and what it’s name is.
DAN BLOOM
Chiayi City
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS