The media must take responsibility for the distorted reports on groups of Chinese tourists brought over by Amway China.
Media have, for example, reported that Taiwan stands to make a profit of NT$600 million (US$17.7 million) from the nine groups. But Taiwanese tourists have brought that much money to China tens or hundreds of times over.
Media also quoted some of the tourists saying they didn’t care if they reached the limit on their credit cards and others saying they had so much money that they couldn’t spend it all. Others even opened their wallets to show their bills to the camera.
Exaggerated coverage gives the public a negative impression of the situation. The average income in Taiwan is several times higher than that in China, so why does our worth seem to plunge whenever Chinese tourists arrive? What are the media implying?
Ridiculously incorrect reports that are subjective and biased often attract criticism. As one expert said: “The media is welcome to report on the visits by the Amway groups, but there is no need to go into such extreme detail. Reporting what they buy and eat is of little public benefit.”
Propaganda by pan-blue media and excessive promotion by tourism authorities on both sides of the Taiwan Strait lead tourists to believe they need to demonstrate how wealthy they are to show their sincerity. The result is the opposite and wounds the feelings and dignity of the Taiwanese. Businesspeople are also misled, as they fail to grasp the infrastructure, manpower and services needed to promote Taiwanese culture.
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and his government have bragged about the expected numbers of tourists from China and their buying power, but both have fallen far short of expectations.
When the government lifted its ban on Chinese tourists in July, the average number of visitors from China was 164 per day. After it extended the cross-strait charter flights from weekends to weekdays in December, the number increased to 363 per day, and to 667 in January.
Since the Chinese government does not want to lose face, it has started to manipulate tourism to Taiwan through a “group in, group out” policy, boosting the number to more than 2,000 per day in recent weeks, in addition to the Amway groups.
Meanwhile, many Chinese provinces and cities are now promoting trips to Taiwan by “tens of thousands of people,” planning charter flights or trips via the “small three links.”
It seems the domestic tourism industry’s goal of 3,000 Chinese tourists per day will be met soon, as a total of 3,938 Chinese tourists entered Taiwan on March 16.
But even if 3,000 Chinese tourists visited Taiwan every day, the total number would only be around 1 million per year, compared with a total of 330,000 last year. But the number of Taiwanese tourists visiting China is 4 million per year, and Taiwanese tourists have greater buying power.
The imbalance is obvious, yet the media are deliberately ignoring it.
Boosting the tourism industry is just a part of Taiwan’s efforts to boost its economy and not the whole picture.
Sustainable efforts would require looking at other parts of the world and attracting tourists from other countries rather than focusing on the Chinese market alone.
This is all the more important as some Chinese tour groups are charging less than NT$10,000 for a three-day visit to Taiwan.
Lu I-ming is the former publisher and president of the Taiwan Shin Sheng Daily News.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
RSS