Economist Joseph Schumpeter has said that economic systems have the ability to repair themselves, and Nobel laureate in economics Paul Samuelson has said a situation similar to the Great Depression of the 1930s will not occur.
Many economists share the same views and firmly believe that particular period of economic collapse was the only case of its kind in history and that such a tragedy will never happen again.
However, experience tells us that the end of one economic storm is actually the start of another.
No matter how complete economic policies may be, problems such as unemployment, poverty and hunger can still strike us time and time again.
Based on experience gained from past economic crises, economist John Maynard Keynes suggested adopting an expansionary fiscal policy to stimulate the economy through increased demand.
This remedy has worked in the past and this is the major focus of Taiwan’s current economic policy.
PAST LESSONS
Because history repeats itself, past economic crises have shown us that economic problems can hardly be solved by economic means alone.
Even if we can survive the current economic crisis, economic strategy without social and cultural reform could very well lead to a repeat of the Great Depression.
Opinions vary greatly on the causes of economic recession. Economist Ravi Batra said economic recession was mainly the result of excessive centralization of wealth within a society. Many economic theories echo this view and blame recession on uneven income.
BANK TROUBLE
When wealth is excessively centralized, the number of people with little or no assets increases and more people demand loans from banks.
Because the demands for loans from the low and middle income brackets will always be higher than those of the rich, and as more people are unable to pay their loans, more banks run the risk of going bankrupt.
Another side effect of the uneven distribution of wealth is an increase in speculative expenditure.
When people’s fortunes increase, their willingness and opportunities to take risks with their money also increase. This shows us that when the rich, who are the minority in society, purchase assets and goods, including trading in the futures market, they do so with the goal to make profit through resale and not production.
Therefore, economic crises can hit us at any time if our economic policies simply duplicate the social dominance of the wealthy.
Although our government has proposed numerous plans to stimulate consumption, it has not thought about using the economic downturn as an opportunity to change our social culture and create new values for our citizens.
SELFISHNESS
Even if the economy does recover, people will still fight for their own interests when “desire” outweighs “need.”
In the process, making money often becomes their first priority.
When this happens, people will become subordinate to the wealthy as life becomes increasingly concerned with the accumulation of wealth and sensual pleasures.
This culture of greed, belligerence and exploitation may be able to create individual wealth. Such a culture, however, is incapable of bringing long-term happiness.
Chiou Tian-juh is a professor in the Department of Social Psychology at Shih Hsin University.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS