Taipower needs to rethink
Taipower plans to construct a super high-voltage (345,000 volts) transmission tower and line in the corridor between Peitou (北斗) and Tienwei (田尾) in Changhua County. Tienwei residents staged a demonstration against this project last Sunday. The demonstration was televised but hardly made the headlines.
It is a well-known fact that the electromagnetic fields generated by high-voltage transmission towers and lines have long-term adverse effects, including cancer for human and animals alike. Since the target corridor is a densely populated area, it would be hard to measure the extent of damage that Taipower’s project could engender.
Tienwei is considered the flower garden of Taiwan. This beautiful town in central Taiwan attracts many tourists who enjoy and purchase a variety of beautiful flowers and plants. This is a vital industry. If Taipower’s super high-voltage project were completed, tourists would shy away from the area and the outcome would be unbearable. The local economy would be destroyed, property values would plunge and people would be deprived of another beautiful place for leisure and relaxation.
As one of the Tienwei demonstrators suggested, Taipower should shift the high-voltage system to the shore along the nearby Choshui River (濁水溪), where the ecological effect would be minimal. Who knows, the turbid water in the river might clear up as a result of the operation of this system.
Energy, environment and economy (the 3E’s) should be mutually compatible. Taipower is advised to reevaluate the route of the proposed system so that the 3E’s are optimized without damaging each other.
CHARLES HONG
Columbus, Ohio
No clean coal
Bjorn Lomborg, the director of the Copenhagen Consensus Center, heaped scorn on anti-coal environmentalists (“Getting rid of coal-fired power plants will not be that easy,” March 18, page 9). Lomborg is an economist who relates all public projects to rigorous “cost-benefit analysis” and the benefits he values are primarily economic. Like most apologists for corporate eco-crime, he sees “the economy” as sacred, while rivers and mountains are just features on a map.
A very instructive reply to Lomborg by Tom Burke, former director of Friends of the Earth, can be found in an old issue of the Guardian. In the article, “This is neither scepticism nor science — just nonsense,” published on Oct. 23, 2004, Burke asked why Lomborg’s work on climate change was taken seriously.
Responsible environmentalists aren’t asking that we abruptly pull the plug on all coal-fired plants. There is a need to transition from horribly polluting sources of energy to cleaner, renewable ones. Everyone knows this will take time.
However, with oil prices poised to soar at any time, countries that have a lot of coal (including China and the US) are ramping up production. In the US, coal mining often involves blowing the top off a mountain, displacing huge amounts of rubble into stream valleys and aggressively removing coal seams underneath. “Restoration” afterwards is like having your face surgically removed and getting a rubber mask as a replacement. Lomborg is fronting for companies that want to do a great deal more of this work.
We need less, not more, coal mining and coal burning. Not only do coal plants contribute to global warming, the fly ash and chemical discharge from coal-burning plants poisons the air, land and water. Mercury discharged by coal plants builds up in bugs, fish and birds and ultimately in humans at the top of the food chain, and it is a very serious poison. The world’s dirtiest coal plant is located in Taichung, Taiwan. In spite of recent efforts to spin “clean coal,” there really is no such thing.
CHRISTOPHER LOGAN
Ilan
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its