Taipower needs to rethink
Taipower plans to construct a super high-voltage (345,000 volts) transmission tower and line in the corridor between Peitou (北斗) and Tienwei (田尾) in Changhua County. Tienwei residents staged a demonstration against this project last Sunday. The demonstration was televised but hardly made the headlines.
It is a well-known fact that the electromagnetic fields generated by high-voltage transmission towers and lines have long-term adverse effects, including cancer for human and animals alike. Since the target corridor is a densely populated area, it would be hard to measure the extent of damage that Taipower’s project could engender.
Tienwei is considered the flower garden of Taiwan. This beautiful town in central Taiwan attracts many tourists who enjoy and purchase a variety of beautiful flowers and plants. This is a vital industry. If Taipower’s super high-voltage project were completed, tourists would shy away from the area and the outcome would be unbearable. The local economy would be destroyed, property values would plunge and people would be deprived of another beautiful place for leisure and relaxation.
As one of the Tienwei demonstrators suggested, Taipower should shift the high-voltage system to the shore along the nearby Choshui River (濁水溪), where the ecological effect would be minimal. Who knows, the turbid water in the river might clear up as a result of the operation of this system.
Energy, environment and economy (the 3E’s) should be mutually compatible. Taipower is advised to reevaluate the route of the proposed system so that the 3E’s are optimized without damaging each other.
CHARLES HONG
Columbus, Ohio
No clean coal
Bjorn Lomborg, the director of the Copenhagen Consensus Center, heaped scorn on anti-coal environmentalists (“Getting rid of coal-fired power plants will not be that easy,” March 18, page 9). Lomborg is an economist who relates all public projects to rigorous “cost-benefit analysis” and the benefits he values are primarily economic. Like most apologists for corporate eco-crime, he sees “the economy” as sacred, while rivers and mountains are just features on a map.
A very instructive reply to Lomborg by Tom Burke, former director of Friends of the Earth, can be found in an old issue of the Guardian. In the article, “This is neither scepticism nor science — just nonsense,” published on Oct. 23, 2004, Burke asked why Lomborg’s work on climate change was taken seriously.
Responsible environmentalists aren’t asking that we abruptly pull the plug on all coal-fired plants. There is a need to transition from horribly polluting sources of energy to cleaner, renewable ones. Everyone knows this will take time.
However, with oil prices poised to soar at any time, countries that have a lot of coal (including China and the US) are ramping up production. In the US, coal mining often involves blowing the top off a mountain, displacing huge amounts of rubble into stream valleys and aggressively removing coal seams underneath. “Restoration” afterwards is like having your face surgically removed and getting a rubber mask as a replacement. Lomborg is fronting for companies that want to do a great deal more of this work.
We need less, not more, coal mining and coal burning. Not only do coal plants contribute to global warming, the fly ash and chemical discharge from coal-burning plants poisons the air, land and water. Mercury discharged by coal plants builds up in bugs, fish and birds and ultimately in humans at the top of the food chain, and it is a very serious poison. The world’s dirtiest coal plant is located in Taichung, Taiwan. In spite of recent efforts to spin “clean coal,” there really is no such thing.
CHRISTOPHER LOGAN
Ilan
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS