Ahead of Indonesia’s April elections, female candidates are knocking on doors, making Facebook “friends” and even singing at circumcision ceremonies to break the male stranglehold on parliament.
Jakarta candidate Fitriah Elvie Sukaesih, a singer of dangdut folk-pop songs at weddings and circumcision celebrations, has a unique campaigning style: waiting until her signature tune to make her political pitch.
“I don’t say things like ‘vote for me’ but before I sing my favourite song Sekuntum Mawar Merah [A Stalk of Red Rose] I say I’m running for election and ask people to pray for me,” she said.
“I have received quite a lot of support.” she adds.
Not all the women candidates have Sukaesih’s talent for song, but they share a passion for their country and a desire to change parliament’s gender imbalance.
About 360 of the 12,000 people vying for spots in the 560-seat House of Representatives are women, although women only account for 11 of the outgoing members of parliament (MPs).
Hopes for a more equal distribution of power in the most populous Muslim-majority country were dashed last month when the government blocked a bid by the electoral commission to set aside 30 percent of seats for women.
Women’s activists and legislators have threatened to take to the streets to pressure the government to allocate more seats to women, but most admit they face an uphill battle in what remains a deeply patriarchal society.
“In Indonesia, women are always sidelined in terms of access to education, health care, the economy and politics. Women always have to assume the supportive role while men take on the decision-making role,” said Masruchah, secretary-general of the Indonesian Women’s Coalition.
“There are many women who meet the minimum criteria for the elections but the community always assumes women don’t have the capacity to lead,” she added.
Center for Electoral Reform analyst Hadar Nafis Gumay said Islam was another obstacle.
“Indonesia is a male-dominated society and a lot of things, including politics, is done the Muslim way,” he said. “A lot of Muslim political parties and religious leaders say women are not appropriate to lead the country and if a country is led by women, the country will be destroyed.”
Megawati Sukarnoputri, who led the country as president from 2001 to 2004, is a notable exception to the rule. But she also hails from an exceptional political family with a powerful legacy.
The quietly spoken leader of the Democratic Party of Struggle is the daughter of the country’s first president, Sukarno, seen as the hero of Indonesian independence. Few would argue that without her pedigree Megawati would never have entered politics or won a single vote.
Yet today she remains the closest rival of President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono as the liberal former general seeks re-election in July.
“She benefited from her father’s legacy [in 2001]. That was her source of power. To become president this time round, she will have to prove that professionally she can do the job,” political analyst Sri Budi Eko Wardani said.
Women from less fortunate backgrounds have no such reservoir of power to draw upon as they take to the hustings ahead of the April 9 general elections. But they are not short of imagination, ideas and energy.
Wearing a tracksuit and running shoes, Jakarta candidate and former TV newscaster Yasmin Muntaz has been knocking on “thousands of doors” in her South Jakarta neighborhood of Bintaro for the past three months.
“The best time to visit homes is at 6am. Everyone is awake and getting ready to go to work or school. I introduce myself and convince them to choose me,” she said.
Muntaz has also set up a profile on Internet networking site Facebook to post her thoughts on politics and chat with her 1,600 “friends.”
Many of the women may be cash-strapped and politically inexperienced, but they know their male competitors are seen as corrupt and lazy after a spate of corruption scandals involving senior male officials and lawmakers.
“The public knows we aren’t like male politicians who are corrupt and womanizing, and that we are more meticulous than men. Those are our plus points,” lawmaker Watty Amir said.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS