Ahead of Indonesia’s April elections, female candidates are knocking on doors, making Facebook “friends” and even singing at circumcision ceremonies to break the male stranglehold on parliament.
Jakarta candidate Fitriah Elvie Sukaesih, a singer of dangdut folk-pop songs at weddings and circumcision celebrations, has a unique campaigning style: waiting until her signature tune to make her political pitch.
“I don’t say things like ‘vote for me’ but before I sing my favourite song Sekuntum Mawar Merah [A Stalk of Red Rose] I say I’m running for election and ask people to pray for me,” she said.
“I have received quite a lot of support.” she adds.
Not all the women candidates have Sukaesih’s talent for song, but they share a passion for their country and a desire to change parliament’s gender imbalance.
About 360 of the 12,000 people vying for spots in the 560-seat House of Representatives are women, although women only account for 11 of the outgoing members of parliament (MPs).
Hopes for a more equal distribution of power in the most populous Muslim-majority country were dashed last month when the government blocked a bid by the electoral commission to set aside 30 percent of seats for women.
Women’s activists and legislators have threatened to take to the streets to pressure the government to allocate more seats to women, but most admit they face an uphill battle in what remains a deeply patriarchal society.
“In Indonesia, women are always sidelined in terms of access to education, health care, the economy and politics. Women always have to assume the supportive role while men take on the decision-making role,” said Masruchah, secretary-general of the Indonesian Women’s Coalition.
“There are many women who meet the minimum criteria for the elections but the community always assumes women don’t have the capacity to lead,” she added.
Center for Electoral Reform analyst Hadar Nafis Gumay said Islam was another obstacle.
“Indonesia is a male-dominated society and a lot of things, including politics, is done the Muslim way,” he said. “A lot of Muslim political parties and religious leaders say women are not appropriate to lead the country and if a country is led by women, the country will be destroyed.”
Megawati Sukarnoputri, who led the country as president from 2001 to 2004, is a notable exception to the rule. But she also hails from an exceptional political family with a powerful legacy.
The quietly spoken leader of the Democratic Party of Struggle is the daughter of the country’s first president, Sukarno, seen as the hero of Indonesian independence. Few would argue that without her pedigree Megawati would never have entered politics or won a single vote.
Yet today she remains the closest rival of President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono as the liberal former general seeks re-election in July.
“She benefited from her father’s legacy [in 2001]. That was her source of power. To become president this time round, she will have to prove that professionally she can do the job,” political analyst Sri Budi Eko Wardani said.
Women from less fortunate backgrounds have no such reservoir of power to draw upon as they take to the hustings ahead of the April 9 general elections. But they are not short of imagination, ideas and energy.
Wearing a tracksuit and running shoes, Jakarta candidate and former TV newscaster Yasmin Muntaz has been knocking on “thousands of doors” in her South Jakarta neighborhood of Bintaro for the past three months.
“The best time to visit homes is at 6am. Everyone is awake and getting ready to go to work or school. I introduce myself and convince them to choose me,” she said.
Muntaz has also set up a profile on Internet networking site Facebook to post her thoughts on politics and chat with her 1,600 “friends.”
Many of the women may be cash-strapped and politically inexperienced, but they know their male competitors are seen as corrupt and lazy after a spate of corruption scandals involving senior male officials and lawmakers.
“The public knows we aren’t like male politicians who are corrupt and womanizing, and that we are more meticulous than men. Those are our plus points,” lawmaker Watty Amir said.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS