Ahead of Indonesia’s April elections, female candidates are knocking on doors, making Facebook “friends” and even singing at circumcision ceremonies to break the male stranglehold on parliament.
Jakarta candidate Fitriah Elvie Sukaesih, a singer of dangdut folk-pop songs at weddings and circumcision celebrations, has a unique campaigning style: waiting until her signature tune to make her political pitch.
“I don’t say things like ‘vote for me’ but before I sing my favourite song Sekuntum Mawar Merah [A Stalk of Red Rose] I say I’m running for election and ask people to pray for me,” she said.
“I have received quite a lot of support.” she adds.
Not all the women candidates have Sukaesih’s talent for song, but they share a passion for their country and a desire to change parliament’s gender imbalance.
About 360 of the 12,000 people vying for spots in the 560-seat House of Representatives are women, although women only account for 11 of the outgoing members of parliament (MPs).
Hopes for a more equal distribution of power in the most populous Muslim-majority country were dashed last month when the government blocked a bid by the electoral commission to set aside 30 percent of seats for women.
Women’s activists and legislators have threatened to take to the streets to pressure the government to allocate more seats to women, but most admit they face an uphill battle in what remains a deeply patriarchal society.
“In Indonesia, women are always sidelined in terms of access to education, health care, the economy and politics. Women always have to assume the supportive role while men take on the decision-making role,” said Masruchah, secretary-general of the Indonesian Women’s Coalition.
“There are many women who meet the minimum criteria for the elections but the community always assumes women don’t have the capacity to lead,” she added.
Center for Electoral Reform analyst Hadar Nafis Gumay said Islam was another obstacle.
“Indonesia is a male-dominated society and a lot of things, including politics, is done the Muslim way,” he said. “A lot of Muslim political parties and religious leaders say women are not appropriate to lead the country and if a country is led by women, the country will be destroyed.”
Megawati Sukarnoputri, who led the country as president from 2001 to 2004, is a notable exception to the rule. But she also hails from an exceptional political family with a powerful legacy.
The quietly spoken leader of the Democratic Party of Struggle is the daughter of the country’s first president, Sukarno, seen as the hero of Indonesian independence. Few would argue that without her pedigree Megawati would never have entered politics or won a single vote.
Yet today she remains the closest rival of President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono as the liberal former general seeks re-election in July.
“She benefited from her father’s legacy [in 2001]. That was her source of power. To become president this time round, she will have to prove that professionally she can do the job,” political analyst Sri Budi Eko Wardani said.
Women from less fortunate backgrounds have no such reservoir of power to draw upon as they take to the hustings ahead of the April 9 general elections. But they are not short of imagination, ideas and energy.
Wearing a tracksuit and running shoes, Jakarta candidate and former TV newscaster Yasmin Muntaz has been knocking on “thousands of doors” in her South Jakarta neighborhood of Bintaro for the past three months.
“The best time to visit homes is at 6am. Everyone is awake and getting ready to go to work or school. I introduce myself and convince them to choose me,” she said.
Muntaz has also set up a profile on Internet networking site Facebook to post her thoughts on politics and chat with her 1,600 “friends.”
Many of the women may be cash-strapped and politically inexperienced, but they know their male competitors are seen as corrupt and lazy after a spate of corruption scandals involving senior male officials and lawmakers.
“The public knows we aren’t like male politicians who are corrupt and womanizing, and that we are more meticulous than men. Those are our plus points,” lawmaker Watty Amir said.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS