The contrast in the reactions of members of the two communities named by Taipower on Tuesday as potential sites for a new radioactive waste storage facility was striking, to say the least.
While residents of Penghu’s Wang-an Township (望安) were united and vehement in their opposition to the planned dump, the reaction of the people of Taitung County’s Daren Township (達仁) could only be described as bizarre.
News that nearly 100,000 barrels of low-level radioactive waste could be deposited in one’s community would, in any other part of the world, be greeted with condemnation and protests. But if Wednesday’s reaction was anything to go by, then apart from a few local councilors and Aboriginal activists, the people of Daren don’t seem too bothered.
Maybe it has something to do with, as environmental activists suggested, the fact that locals remain grossly uninformed or even misinformed about the consequences of locating such a facility in their community. Are the Aborigines of Daren aware, for instance, of the history of this waste? And that it is being relocated as a result of a three-decade long fight by the Tao Aborigines of Orchid Island to have it removed?
Or maybe their indifference is connected to the NT$5 billion (US$147.8 million) “friendly neighbor” payment that Taipower plans to give the local authority of the location eventually selected as the site for the dump. Indeed, Nantian Village (南田) head Chang Chih-hsin (張志信) said that more than 60 percent of the villagers backed the plan because of the money and job opportunities promised by Taipower.
Although low-level radioactive waste of the kind in question is generally not seen as hazardous, the US’ Nuclear Regulatory Commission says that even the least dangerous kinds of waste pose a slight threat to human health.
Wherever the facility will be located, Taipower must be able to guarantee that, despite regular typhoons, earthquakes, landslides and various other natural phenomena, the integrity of the site and residents’ health will not be compromised.
It is highly unlikely that anyone from Taipower has discussed this with the villagers.
Unfortunately, this is just another example of politicians attempting to exploit the disadvantaged. But even more worrying in this case is that people seem comfortable with the fact.
While Nantian residents may have one eye on the employment opportunities and money, they should also think back and consider why, after decades of aid and government promises, Taiwan’s Aborigines remain among the poorest and most marginalized people in Taiwan.
If Taipower eventually does choose Daren as the final location, and that seems all the more likely considering the reaction of the two sites following Tuesday’s announcement, then all efforts must be made to ensure that the required referendum is carried out in a transparent fashion after all the pros and cons of this issue have been explained in full to the residents.
Legislation should also be passed to ensure that the money benefits the people of Daren instead of being siphoned off by corrupt local officials, as has happened so often in Taiwan in the past.
If the people of Daren are still willing to accept the risks, then at least they should be rewarded for it.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS