You say CECA, I say ECFA — let’s call the whole thing off.
I don't know about you, but I've had just about enough of the alphabet-soup jabbering over President Ma Ying-jeou's (馬英九) proposed economic agreement with the Chicoms.
First it was a CECA, or “Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement.” The CECA had aimed to get the two sides to the economic equivalent of “second base,” as our American friends say, further enhancing Taiwan and China’s trade relationship.
In more concrete terms, it would lower tariff and other trade barriers for a range of goods in line with regional trends.
But to many Taiwanese ears, CECA sounds suspiciously like CEPA — the agreement that Hong Kong inked with Beijing a few years after reverting to Chinese control.
In other words, it seemed like Ma was preppin’ us for a no-holds barred, pack-the-edible-underwear and gobble-the-Viagra love hotel tryst with the Chicoms.
Naturally, that’s going too far and too fast for most Taiwanese. Our economy is already in a depraved lip-lock with China’s, so do we really want to become full-fledged “friends with benefits”?
I mean, we’re not that drunk — most of us, anyway.
So, in his predictable, reactive (read: spineless, Jell-O-like) style, Ma beat a hasty retreat. Now, he says, we’re not going to have a CEPA, we’re going to have an ECFA (Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement) instead.
Apparently, Ma thinks that shifting to a harder-to-pronounce acronym will make it go down better politically.
To me, ECFA sounds like a communicable skin disease — something you might pick up in the Combat Zone if you’re not careful.
The Bloomberg news agency said: “President Ma Ying-jeou proposed Feb. 27 that the pact be described as an economic framework and asserted that it would not involve the sensitive issues of unification or independence but rather … be part of Taiwan’s efforts to better position itself in the global economic landscape.”
By “position” ourselves, I guess Ma means applying a generous dollop of KY, grabbing both ankles and gazing toward Guam.
As the Taiwan News writes: “the gravest issue in this flap is the evident inability or, more likely, abject refusal of the Ma government to frankly discuss and thoroughly discuss the nature of an ECFA and CECA and the attendant costs and risks as well as purported benefits with Taiwan’s opposition parties, diverse economic, civic and social ‘stakeholders’ and all citizens.”
A bit wordy, that — but I heartily agree (I think).
Exhibit A: What is to be included in the CECA-cum-ECFA other than generally lower tariffs?
Dunno.
Ma promises, as he did in his campaign, that any such agreement wouldn’t allow Chinese laborers into Taiwan’s job market or result in a flood of cheap agricultural products. But are we supposed to take his word for it?
Even former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) pulled himself together long enough to croak to a reporter that an ECFA wouldn’t make Taiwan any better off, and that it would be “silly” to think that it could.
And the China Post generously noted that not everyone thinks this is an economics-only issue: “CECA would result in a downgrade of Taiwan’s sovereignty and pave the way for unification with China, the opposition said.”
But forget the tiresome sovereignty debate. Here’s my question: China, aka Melaministan, has a proven track record as a source of toxic, shoddy products. Even Beijing this week described the food safety situation as “grim.” (Take that, you WHO flunkies!)
So do we really want to make it easier for Chicoms to flood our little island with planeloads of low-grade, poisonous crap?
Moreover, it looks like Ma’s clever name games were too hard for the Chicoms to follow. According to Bloomberg, Chicom big cheese Wen Jiabao (溫家寶) had the following to say as he addressed China’s “parliament” (sneer quotes intended): “‘We will accelerate normalization of cross-straits economic relations and promote the signing of a comprehensive agreement on economic cooperation,’ Wen said in his work report, presented to the National People’s Congress in Beijing today.”
So much for The Economic Pact Formerly Known As CECA. And not only that, now Wen’s talking about a peace agreement.
Hold on to your dentures there, Grandpa Wen. I know “Mr Malleable” Ma is the best thing to happen to China in decades, but still — aren’t we getting just a wee bit ahead of ourselves?
The Chicoms are all in a lather wanting to lock in some kind of political deal while their best bud Ma is still in office. But Ma realizes that scoring too high, too soon on the Wuss Index could see his reelection chances capsize faster than an overcrowded Bangladeshi ferry.
Selling out Taiwan can wait until his second term.
In the meantime, the government needs to go back to the drawing board to come up with intermediate agreements that Taiwanese find more palatable.
An obvious starting point: toilet restaurant cooperation. According to Time magazine’s Web site this week, Taiwan’s own Modern Toilet restaurant chain — you know, the one that dishes up curry chicken and chocolate ice cream in mini-toilet bowls — is all set to open a store in Shenzhen.
Which means now would be the perfect time for an alternate CECA: a “Comprehensive Edible Crap Agreement.” This will provide low-interest loans and other perks to make it easier for Chicom toilet restaurants to invest in Taiwan, and vice versa. A small but important step in freeing up cross-strait trade and investment.
Here are a few other suggestions to get our bureaucrats’ mental wheels turning:
NMPWTA: The “No Melamine, Please — We’re Taiwanese” Agreement, which would ban all Chinese goods. This one’s popular in Sanchong (三重).
FUCKTVA: The “Free, Unlimited Cross-Strait KTV” Agreement, which would provide free entry for Chinese tourists visiting Taiwanese KTVs, and vice versa. Expected to increase total amount of tuneless warbling by 316 percent.
CECBJCMNTFCA: the “Closer Economic Cooperation, But Jesus Christ Man, Not That Frickin’ Close” Agreement. Similar to the CECA, but with smaller tariff cuts and no scary details.
NMAFA, aka TIBET: The “No More Absconding Filipinas” Agreement (also known as “The Indigent Boomerang Effect is Toast”), in which runaway housemaids and carers for Taiwan’s young, infirm and elderly are locked up in a Chinese thought-correction-through-slavery camp near Lhasa instead of being deported to Manila.
SELAGDA: the “Screw the Economy, Let’s All Get Drunk” Agreement. Expected to boost kaoliang sales 43 percent and double Kinmen’s GDP.
The BOOM-CECA-ROCKA-CECA-ROCKA-CECA-BOOM Agreement. Not sure what this one’s about, but it might get us all singing.
Got something to tell Johnny? Go on, get it off your chest. Write to dearjohnny@taipeitimes.com, but be sure to put “Dear Johnny” in the subject line or he’ll mark your bouquets and brickbats as spam.
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
Xiaomi Corp founder Lei Jun (雷軍) on May 22 made a high-profile announcement, giving online viewers a sneak peek at the company’s first 3-nanometer mobile processor — the Xring O1 chip — and saying it is a breakthrough in China’s chip design history. Although Xiaomi might be capable of designing chips, it lacks the ability to manufacture them. No matter how beautifully planned the blueprints are, if they cannot be mass-produced, they are nothing more than drawings on paper. The truth is that China’s chipmaking efforts are still heavily reliant on the free world — particularly on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
On May 13, the Legislative Yuan passed an amendment to Article 6 of the Nuclear Reactor Facilities Regulation Act (核子反應器設施管制法) that would extend the life of nuclear reactors from 40 to 60 years, thereby providing a legal basis for the extension or reactivation of nuclear power plants. On May 20, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) legislators used their numerical advantage to pass the TPP caucus’ proposal for a public referendum that would determine whether the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant should resume operations, provided it is deemed safe by the authorities. The Central Election Commission (CEC) has
RSS