The government has attempted to create a holiday atmosphere by distributing NT$85.7 billion (US$2.54 billion) in consumer vouchers to every citizen and foreign spouse, as if these NT$3,600 vouchers could boost the nation’s economy.
But public excitement soon waned when figures released on Thursday showed growing unemployment. The Directorate General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) reported the unemployment rate had surged to a six-year high of 5.03 percent last month. The last time the figure set a record was in September 2003 at 5.05 percent.
Following a string of gloomy forecasts made by local and foreign institutes, most people realize that the economy is headed toward its first recession since 2001. But what people don’t understand is how bad the situation is — not on the books but in real lives.
Data provided by the DGBAS shows the number of unemployed people surged to 549,000 last month, the highest level since the agency began collecting unemployment data in 1978. The DGBAS said more than 1.16 million people were affected by worsening unemployment.
The record-high unemployment has undoubtedly led to economic activity slowing significantly last month, with the nation in a deep downturn.
While the job market is likely to see some improvement this month owing to the hiring of temporary workers in the service sector for Lunar New Year promotional activities, both DGBAS officials and economists have warned that the dismal situation is likely to continue after the holiday as companies shut down or cut jobs to cope with the slowdown.
The real job situation, however, could be worse than people expect because the “official numbers” do not tell the full unemployment picture.
Under the government’s definition of unemployment, people who work less than 16 hours a week and those who are not looking for work specifically because they believe there aren’t any jobs suitable for them are not counted as jobless.
If these two groups were included, the actual unemployment number last month may have been as high as 803,000.
There is also a discrepancy in the government’s designation of the 1.21 million people who worked less than 35 hours a week last month — defined by the government as employed even though their hours were less than the standard 42-hour work week set by the government.
These people — including those who worked part-time or were asked by companies to take unpaid leave — had jobs, but what they earned was not enough to properly support their livelihoods.
If this dire unemployment situation continues, it is likely to worsen already weakened private consumption. Although that scenario could increase the odds of a second distribution of consumer vouchers in the second half of the year, that would only help boost private consumption in the short term, ignoring the unemployment problem.
The government’s recent creation of short-term job opportunities in the public sector can only reduce the jobless figure temporarily; it doesn’t solve the core problem. To increase job opportunities, the government will have to facilitate industry development and encourage businesses to invest in Taiwan.
Another thing to worry about is the fact that some government officials seem to take the vouchers as a cure-all for the economy. But when people no longer have jobs, how can you expect them to boost the economy by spending?
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS