At the end of a year troubled by economic hardship, newspaper reports say the government will push its “National Health Insurance [NHI] Version 1.5” in an attempt to expand the revenue base and raise the contribution rate of the middle class to relieve the financial difficulties of the poor.
On the other hand, the government has failed to launch a thorough inquiry into longstanding public dissatisfaction with the high year-end bonuses for Bureau of National Health Insurance (BNHI) staff.
This dissatisfaction is a result of the NHI’s financial losses, increased premiums, the poor quality of medical services and the lack of public involvement in NHI policymaking.
To solve the problem, the government wants to turn the BNHI into an agency directly under the Executive Yuan, but that will only make the matter more complicated.
With this temporary, shortsighted and misdirected approach to changing the NHI, it is worrying that the government — after more than half a year in power — still hasn’t drawn up a comprehensive blueprint for the NHI program.
Will the insurance system, which has been called a social safety valve, drift farther and farther away from meeting the public’s needs?
Justice and quality are the two cornerstones of the NHI program. In the 13 years since the program was implemented, the government has never been able to effectively contain the waste of medical resources and irregularities of the system.
Because of an opaque process when making decisions and a lack of a connection between income and spending, the committee deciding on the BNHI’s NT$460 billion (US$13.7 billion) expenditure has degenerated into a body where medical sector managers exploit the benefits of the scheme under the table.
The government is required to launch reforms to increase the efficiency of NHI expenditure, but the effort has been halted by opposition from the medical sector. As long as these problems are not actively dealt with, it flouts social justice to begin by taking money from the public’s premium payments.
The public is often told that the NHI program is useless and that people must pay for things themselves because they are not covered by the NHI program. However, the receipts they get from the hospital are either not detailed or hard to verify.
Often when someone insured by the NHI must be hospitalized, they find it hard to find an NHI-insured bed, yet it is impossible to check the availability of NHI beds.
Medical quality reports requested by the public and academics do not address the issue and provide only limited information.
This makes one wonder what has improved as a result of the annual 5 percent increase in NHI premiums. In addition, grassroots medical personnel often complain that medical sector managers hold back on medical service manpower and quality to reduce cost while the public still has to pay its NHI premiums.
The NHI program has suffered financial losses of around NT$30 billion and the public must shoulder the burden of increasing premiums. A lack of information about medical service quality makes the public feel lost when seeking medical treatment. Little wonder that people are greatly disappointed by the NHI program and feel indignant at the high year-end bonuses given to BNHI employees.
The Taiwan Health Care Reform Foundation thinks that the second-generation NHI program proposed by various industries enjoys public support because it involves public participation, a connection between income and expenditure and a balance between rights and duties.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Cabinet and the legislature should strike out a new path and prioritize the new NHI bill. The government should take the initiative in publicizing each hospital’s financial statements and information on its medical service utilization and irregularities.
It should also push through legislation to establish a transparent supervisory committee that stresses public participation in the NHI program and ensures that income and spending are connected.
If the government only turns the BNHI into an executive organization and implements Version 1.5 to evade the issue, it would be acting as if it viewed the public as an ATM and only halfheartedly reforming the health insurance system.
We hope the public’s New Year’s wishes for the NHI program will come true as soon as possible.
Huang Chiang-hsiang is a project specialist at the Taiwan Health Care Reform Foundation and Liu Mei-chun is executive director of the foundation.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS