At the end of a year troubled by economic hardship, newspaper reports say the government will push its “National Health Insurance [NHI] Version 1.5” in an attempt to expand the revenue base and raise the contribution rate of the middle class to relieve the financial difficulties of the poor.
On the other hand, the government has failed to launch a thorough inquiry into longstanding public dissatisfaction with the high year-end bonuses for Bureau of National Health Insurance (BNHI) staff.
This dissatisfaction is a result of the NHI’s financial losses, increased premiums, the poor quality of medical services and the lack of public involvement in NHI policymaking.
To solve the problem, the government wants to turn the BNHI into an agency directly under the Executive Yuan, but that will only make the matter more complicated.
With this temporary, shortsighted and misdirected approach to changing the NHI, it is worrying that the government — after more than half a year in power — still hasn’t drawn up a comprehensive blueprint for the NHI program.
Will the insurance system, which has been called a social safety valve, drift farther and farther away from meeting the public’s needs?
Justice and quality are the two cornerstones of the NHI program. In the 13 years since the program was implemented, the government has never been able to effectively contain the waste of medical resources and irregularities of the system.
Because of an opaque process when making decisions and a lack of a connection between income and spending, the committee deciding on the BNHI’s NT$460 billion (US$13.7 billion) expenditure has degenerated into a body where medical sector managers exploit the benefits of the scheme under the table.
The government is required to launch reforms to increase the efficiency of NHI expenditure, but the effort has been halted by opposition from the medical sector. As long as these problems are not actively dealt with, it flouts social justice to begin by taking money from the public’s premium payments.
The public is often told that the NHI program is useless and that people must pay for things themselves because they are not covered by the NHI program. However, the receipts they get from the hospital are either not detailed or hard to verify.
Often when someone insured by the NHI must be hospitalized, they find it hard to find an NHI-insured bed, yet it is impossible to check the availability of NHI beds.
Medical quality reports requested by the public and academics do not address the issue and provide only limited information.
This makes one wonder what has improved as a result of the annual 5 percent increase in NHI premiums. In addition, grassroots medical personnel often complain that medical sector managers hold back on medical service manpower and quality to reduce cost while the public still has to pay its NHI premiums.
The NHI program has suffered financial losses of around NT$30 billion and the public must shoulder the burden of increasing premiums. A lack of information about medical service quality makes the public feel lost when seeking medical treatment. Little wonder that people are greatly disappointed by the NHI program and feel indignant at the high year-end bonuses given to BNHI employees.
The Taiwan Health Care Reform Foundation thinks that the second-generation NHI program proposed by various industries enjoys public support because it involves public participation, a connection between income and expenditure and a balance between rights and duties.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Cabinet and the legislature should strike out a new path and prioritize the new NHI bill. The government should take the initiative in publicizing each hospital’s financial statements and information on its medical service utilization and irregularities.
It should also push through legislation to establish a transparent supervisory committee that stresses public participation in the NHI program and ensures that income and spending are connected.
If the government only turns the BNHI into an executive organization and implements Version 1.5 to evade the issue, it would be acting as if it viewed the public as an ATM and only halfheartedly reforming the health insurance system.
We hope the public’s New Year’s wishes for the NHI program will come true as soon as possible.
Huang Chiang-hsiang is a project specialist at the Taiwan Health Care Reform Foundation and Liu Mei-chun is executive director of the foundation.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS