With the three-year floating postal savings interest rate dropping to 1.575 percent, the nation moved a step closer to zero interest rates.
Taiwan is about to witness another miracle — the lower rates will not have the slightest impact on 400,000 retired military personnel, civil servants and public school teachers who all enjoy an 18 percent preferential interest rate on their retirement funds.
This may be an old issue, but it is still certain to make the nation’s millions of laborers angry at being treated as second-class citizens. Maybe even the military personnel, civil servants and teachers will feel unease at being included in an unjust system.
There is of course a reason for the preferential interest rate. In the past, salaries for military personnel, civil servants and teachers were low and the economic environment at the time led the government to encourage saving to accumulate capital for industrial development.
Today, salaries of military personnel, civil servants and teachers have increased substantially, while the conditions for retirement are now vastly different, which means there is no longer a need for the government to care for them the same way it did in the past. Banks now also have sufficient capital. Given this situation, system reform based on a concern for the national finances, fairness and justice becomes necessary.
The government must of course take an all-encompassing view of this situation and make comprehensive adjustments that consider both fairness and equality, so that the gap between the welfare of civil servants and other members of the public does not become too wide.
We have no intention of criticizing retired government employees who receive the preferential rate. In the past, this scheme was necessary, but today, 25 years later, it remains unchanged and requires thorough reform.
Moreover, primary and secondary school teachers and military personnel don’t have to pay taxes. This practice has been discussed for years, both by the legislature and the general public, but no conclusion has been reached. As in the case of the 18 percent interest rate, the government does not want to offend civil servants. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has taken good care of them, and by comparison, the welfare of laborers, farmers, Aborigines and other disadvantaged groups has been neglected, with some having difficulty making ends meet.
It is precisely these groups that have to bear the brunt as the global economic slowdown hits Taiwan.
If President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) really cares about the general public, he should direct all efforts toward reform of these unreasonable and outdated systems so that government resources are spent on those who need it.
Over the past eight years, the government’s reform of welfare measures was repeatedly obstructed by the KMT’s legislative majority. Today, Ma and the KMT enjoy absolute power with more than two-thirds of all legislative seats and reform would be as easy as pie.
Statistics show that the government will spend almost NT$80 billion (US$2.4 billion) on the 18 percent preferential interest rate this year, or as much as the consumer voucher scheme. This shows the unreasonable distribution of public welfare. The government’s attentiveness to retired military personnel, civil servants and teachers must be adjusted with the times. It must not remain unchanged and give rise to irregularities, of which the 18 percent preferential interest rate is one.
Ma has full responsibility for doing this. He should at least consider the national finances, the changing international economic situation and social fairness, and show his determination to reform the system for the sake of the public.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
George Santayana wrote: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” This article will help readers avoid repeating mistakes by examining four examples from the civil war between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) forces and the Republic of China (ROC) forces that involved two city sieges and two island invasions. The city sieges compared are Changchun (May to October 1948) and Beiping (November 1948 to January 1949, renamed Beijing after its capture), and attempts to invade Kinmen (October 1949) and Hainan (April 1950). Comparing and contrasting these examples, we can learn how Taiwan may prevent a war with
A recent trio of opinion articles in this newspaper reflects the growing anxiety surrounding Washington’s reported request for Taiwan to shift up to 50 percent of its semiconductor production abroad — a process likely to take 10 years, even under the most serious and coordinated effort. Simon H. Tang (湯先鈍) issued a sharp warning (“US trade threatens silicon shield,” Oct. 4, page 8), calling the move a threat to Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” which he argues deters aggression by making Taiwan indispensable. On the same day, Hsiao Hsi-huei (蕭錫惠) (“Responding to US semiconductor policy shift,” Oct. 4, page 8) focused on
Taiwan is rapidly accelerating toward becoming a “super-aged society” — moving at one of the fastest rates globally — with the proportion of elderly people in the population sharply rising. While the demographic shift of “fewer births than deaths” is no longer an anomaly, the nation’s legal framework and social customs appear stuck in the last century. Without adjustments, incidents like last month’s viral kicking incident on the Taipei MRT involving a 73-year-old woman would continue to proliferate, sowing seeds of generational distrust and conflict. The Senior Citizens Welfare Act (老人福利法), originally enacted in 1980 and revised multiple times, positions older
Taiwan’s business-friendly environment and science parks designed to foster technology industries are the key elements of the nation’s winning chip formula, inspiring the US and other countries to try to replicate it. Representatives from US business groups — such as the Greater Phoenix Economic Council, and the Arizona-Taiwan Trade and Investment Office — in July visited the Hsinchu Science Park (新竹科學園區), home to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) headquarters and its first fab. They showed great interest in creating similar science parks, with aims to build an extensive semiconductor chain suitable for the US, with chip designing, packaging and manufacturing. The
RSS