The subprime crisis caused by the burst of the US housing bubble has had a significant impact on the world economy. Many economists and researchers did not see it coming. The downturn is affecting real GDP growth this year and will likely extend into next year.
Like all other countries, Taiwan has been trying hard to cope with the economic slowdown caused by the global financial crisis. The government has adopted various fiscal policies in addition to the central bank’s looser monetary operations. The objective is to stimulate internal demand and attract capital back to the markets.
In addition to individual economic policies, Taiwan can seek to work with neighboring countries and trading partners on improving multilateral monitoring systems embedded in financial structures, strengthening capital markets, promoting sound corporate governance and enhancing transparency with adequate risk management. These are not new concepts, but are worth revisiting at this critical time.
It is not easy for Taiwan to launch intergovernmental cooperation to improve borderless financial systems given its special international status. Nevertheless, Taiwan is a member of APEC, so using APEC as a platform to conduct joint actions and address the financial crisis could be feasible.
APEC has experienced several crises since its formation as an Asia-Pacific intergovernmental entity, and those crises not only tested the organization’s capacity but also its resilience. Given its non-binding nature, APEC does not function like the IMF — trying to bail out economies in trouble. However, it is an organization that can gather wisdom and practicable ideas from around the region.
The APEC meetings were concluded last month. The outcome of those meetings suggested the need for regional economies to collaborate on empowering existing regulatory and supervisory frameworks by paying extra attention to transparency, risk management as well as the role of credit ratings. It also recommended enhancing the quality of financial regulations instead of creating more regulations.
The APEC Business Advisory Council (ABAC) proposed that financial regulations be activity-based rather than entity-based. It said that APEC economies could work together to create a set of guidelines as a reference for individual economies to regulate borderless, high-leveraged and high-risk financial commodities. In short, promoting transparency and improving financial regulatory structure might be the key to prevent the financial crisis from becoming a financial disaster.
The “Report of the Financial Stability Forum on Enhancing Market and Institutional Resilience” issued in April also provided several feasible paradigms. First, the report recommended strengthening capital markets with adequate risk management. Second, it focused on enhancing transparency and valuation. Third, it stressed the importance of the role and uses of crediting ratings to provide investors accurate information. Fourth, it was written to help strengthen authorities’ responsiveness to risks and further help them deal with stress in the financial system. Those paradigms are what we need to resolve the current anomaly caused by the financial crisis.
The most important lesson we have learned from the global financial crisis is that the burst of an industrial bubble could yield financial instability, and financial instability could seriously imperil economic sustainability. It is a cliché that people usually attempt to address an industrial bubble by creating another bubble. And the fundamental reason for doing so is that we tend to target our short-term objectives and ignore long-term goals. We should never forget that quick remedies could lead to unwanted side effects.
The 1997-1998 Asian financial crisis highlighted the need to adopt sound corporate governance to prevent a recurrence of the crisis. Corporate governance is about equal-basis operations, transparency in information sharing and creditable accounting instruments. APEC, ABAC and the Pacific Economic Cooperation Council have done a lot to promote good corporate governance. It is a good time now to transform relevant concepts into concrete actions.
On the subject of promoting sound corporate governance, we can seek to reach an APEC consensus on regulatory architecture to make sure that all institutions that access lenders are on the same page. In the meantime, we might also want to review our current approaches to ratings agencies and market accounting. Potential investors deserve more sufficient and reliable information.
Darson Chiu is an associate research fellow at the Taiwan Institute of Economic Research.
A failure by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to respond to Israel’s brilliant 12-day (June 12-23) bombing and special operations war against Iran, topped by US President Donald Trump’s ordering the June 21 bombing of Iranian deep underground nuclear weapons fuel processing sites, has been noted by some as demonstrating a profound lack of resolve, even “impotence,” by China. However, this would be a dangerous underestimation of CCP ambitions and its broader and more profound military response to the Trump Administration — a challenge that includes an acceleration of its strategies to assist nuclear proxy states, and developing a wide array
Eating at a breakfast shop the other day, I turned to an old man sitting at the table next to mine. “Hey, did you hear that the Legislative Yuan passed a bill to give everyone NT$10,000 [US$340]?” I said, pointing to a newspaper headline. The old man cursed, then said: “Yeah, the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT] canceled the NT$100 billion subsidy for Taiwan Power Co and announced they would give everyone NT$10,000 instead. “Nice. Now they are saying that if electricity prices go up, we can just use that cash to pay for it,” he said. “I have no time for drivel like
Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) reportedly told the EU’s top diplomat that China does not want Russia to lose in Ukraine, because the US could shift its focus to countering Beijing. Wang made the comment while meeting with EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Kaja Kallas on July 2 at the 13th China-EU High-Level Strategic Dialogue in Brussels, the South China Morning Post and CNN reported. Although contrary to China’s claim of neutrality in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, such a frank remark suggests Beijing might prefer a protracted war to keep the US from focusing on
Twenty-four Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers are facing recall votes on Saturday, prompting nearly all KMT officials and lawmakers to rally their supporters over the past weekend, urging them to vote “no” in a bid to retain their seats and preserve the KMT’s majority in the Legislative Yuan. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which had largely kept its distance from the civic recall campaigns, earlier this month instructed its officials and staff to support the recall groups in a final push to protect the nation. The justification for the recalls has increasingly been framed as a “resistance” movement against China and