Some people have said the pan-green camp as a whole should take responsibility for the financial irregularities of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and his family, while former Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislator Lee Wen-chung (李文忠) has applied the same logic to the DPP leadership and demanded that they prove their innocence.
However, both the pan-green camp and Chen are on the same side, and both should have been monitored: Who has ever heard of a democratic system that would trust the governing party to monitor itself? It is the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) — which should have monitored government spending — that are the real hypocrites and guilty of a cover-up.
Recent history has shown that many pro-independence politicians who have gained access to power have become corrupt. Corruption among pro-independence politicians is not only a moral issue, but also a psychological one.
First, they are essentially stealing from the national treasury of the Republic of China, which does not cause any moral conflict in their minds. In addition, corruption reflects feelings of oppression suffered under the KMT. It represents a way to ease frustration caused from seeing Taiwan’s restricted legal independence. The temptation of corruption is thus understandable.
It must be realized that any corruption among pro-independence politicians was learned from the KMT. During its decades in power, the KMT acted with arrogance and with little regard for the legal system. When former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) came into power, he brought the KMT’s corruption out into the open for all to see. This won the respect and admiration of pro-independence supporters, who helped Lee dismantle the old KMT guard.
The DPP at least attempted to monitor the KMT during its time as the opposition. The KMT, on the other hand, was the majority party during its eight years in opposition. It should probably have been allowed to form the Cabinet, but couldn’t overcome Chen’s legally grounded will, and gave up on the idea.
But even so, it should have fulfilled the role of an opposition party and monitored the government. The party was divided on the issue and eventually did not make any attempt to monitor the government. Some if its members were unwilling to let the DPP know where they stood. Others nurtured hopes of being tapped by the new government and others still worried that they would be accused of wanting to reinstate the “alien regime.”
In the absence of the KMT, individuals took on the monitoring task — some of them former KMT members, some former DPP members. Calls for further oversight were heard, but the KMT, surprisingly, refused to respond.
In response to calls from the public, the party’s chairman said the government should monitor itself in response and that it should not rely on the opposition party.
Internally, the KMT said it did what it did to win back power, and that they would deal with the issue later. In other words, the DPP may have been corrupt, but the KMT, afraid of alienating swing voters, decided to turn a blind eye.
If we want to talk about covering this mess up, we cannot put the blame solely on the DPP and pro-independence politicians alone. They were already suspected of corruption and were psychologically prepared for it.
The main effect of the delayed response in blaming the DPP is intended to divert attention from the KMT’s hypocrisy and complicity in the cover up.
Shih Chih-yu is a political science professor at National Taiwan University.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON AND PERRY SVENSSON
KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun’s (鄭麗文) recent visit to Beijing and her upcoming visit to Washington will serve as a high-level test of her diplomatic mettle. In Beijing, Cheng was received with symbolic gestures, a warm reception, and high-level access. In Washington, she will receive far less pomp and far sharper questions about the KMT’s vision for the future of Taiwan. Her challenge will be to persuade Washington that the KMT’s engagement with China can coexist with strong deterrence. Cheng’s April 7-12 visit to mainland China coincided with an intense period of conflict in Iran. Despite the strategic significance of Cheng’s trip,
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has sent the vast Asian chemicals industry into a tailspin. Deprived of the likes of Qatari natural gas and Saudi Arabian oil, the region’s fertilizer and plastics plants are slowing production or even shutting down. Everywhere except China, that is. In petrochemicals, China is unique. As well as a traditional industry that uses oil and gas as feedstock, it has parallel output that relies on its abundant domestic coal. Unsurprisingly, India and other regional powers want to copy and paste the Chinese method. This would not be easy — or climate friendly. The
Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto says he knows how to fix the problems facing Indonesia. Yet his economic mismanagement and authoritarian tendencies are steering the nation toward a familiar mix of currency instability and political chaos. The world’s fourth-most populous nation risks reversing the hard-won democratic and business reforms that came after the Asian Financial Crisis in 1997. At that time, the rupiah collapsed and the political upheaval that followed forced former president Haji Mohamed Suharto from power. Prabowo’s administration is ignoring similar warning signs. That disconnect was apparent in a national address on Wednesday, when Prabowo projected the swagger that has
“Of course you can choose not to be Taiwanese, just do not stay here,” chairwoman of Taipei 101 operator Taipei Financial Center Corp Janet Chia (賈永婕) said in an online interview with local entertainer Tai Chih-yuan (邰智源), triggering intense discussion on social media, with politicians across party lines weighing in. In the interview, which was aired on May 14, Chia and Tai’s discussion over a meal in Taipei 101 covered Chia’s career change from entertainer to chairwoman and US climber Alex Honnold’s free solo climb up the Taipei 101 building. During the interview, Chia said, “Being on this land, we
RSS