Impress with democracy
Already the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is forgetting just what Taiwan stands for and offers the world. “The mainlanders will be our guests,” Premier Liu Chao-shiuan (劉兆玄) said.
“I hope we can work together to impress them with the Taiwanese people’s good nature, politeness, passion and hospitality,” he said.
What about impressing Chinese tourists with democracy, freedom of the press, of religion, of association, of the Internet, to demonstrate, to travel, to criticize the government, the right to privacy and the guarantee of due process of law and a host of other concepts that the tourists may not know even exist?
What about impressing Chinese tourists with the real story about how China is, not how China presents itself to its people through propaganda, restricted access to the Internet and tyranny?
Giving Chinese a good impression of Taiwan is certainly a good strategy. But for oppressed people, just being able to see these things in the newspapers and on TV will open their eyes.
But if the premier has trouble speaking up about the essence of freedom in Taiwan, how can the Chinese judge us? I suspect the government’s plan is to shield Chinese tourists from such things.
Such as no Internet at hotels where Chinese tourists stay because they might find out that the Internet is free and you can type any word and get results. TV will likely be restricted too, with stations critical of China or Taiwan’s government being blocked.
Lee Long-hwa
New York
Good, bad or ugly?
I would also like to add a positive comment to Chaim Melamed’s letter about his incident with customs officers (Letters, July 16, page 8).
I’m a UK citizen, my wife is Taiwanese and my daughter has triple nationality: UK, Taiwan and South Africa, because she was born there, lucky girl. On a Saturday morning two years ago we were checking in at Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport prior to our 9am departure to the UK when we were informed that my daughter’s Republic of China passport had expired three days earlier, and that we would have to reapply for a new passport when the relevant office opened on Monday morning, and even with express action it would take at least one week to process.
Therefore imagine our surprise as we were putting our luggage into a taxi when a lady from the immigration department called us to say that she would process the new passport and we would receive it at 5pm. I immediately went to the airline desk and rebooked on their 8pm flight. After sitting in the airport all day we duly received the passport as promised and left for our summer holidays.
I respectfully remind everyone that this was a Saturday morning!
Upon returning to Taiwan I wrote a letter of thanks and recommendation for this immigration officer to the relevant department, who responded with a very positive reply, stating that the officer had received a commendation and a promotion.
Good things do happen in Taiwan.
Michael Wise
Taipei
In response to Vassilis Tso (Letters, July 17, page 8), both my child’s passports (Canadian and Taiwanese) were presented to immigration. Having traveled through a good part of the world, this was the first time that I ever witnessed a valid Canadian passport not being accepted as proof of citizenship. It is not a case of our misunderstanding procedures but of a willful and arbitrary judgment by an arrogant lackey.
The officer’s opinion that my son is not Canadian was ludicrous and grotesque. The Canadian government considers my son to be a Canadian citizen and gave him a passport and citizenship card. Is this insufficient?
Chaim Melamed
Pingtung
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS