Impress with democracy
Already the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is forgetting just what Taiwan stands for and offers the world. “The mainlanders will be our guests,” Premier Liu Chao-shiuan (劉兆玄) said.
“I hope we can work together to impress them with the Taiwanese people’s good nature, politeness, passion and hospitality,” he said.
What about impressing Chinese tourists with democracy, freedom of the press, of religion, of association, of the Internet, to demonstrate, to travel, to criticize the government, the right to privacy and the guarantee of due process of law and a host of other concepts that the tourists may not know even exist?
What about impressing Chinese tourists with the real story about how China is, not how China presents itself to its people through propaganda, restricted access to the Internet and tyranny?
Giving Chinese a good impression of Taiwan is certainly a good strategy. But for oppressed people, just being able to see these things in the newspapers and on TV will open their eyes.
But if the premier has trouble speaking up about the essence of freedom in Taiwan, how can the Chinese judge us? I suspect the government’s plan is to shield Chinese tourists from such things.
Such as no Internet at hotels where Chinese tourists stay because they might find out that the Internet is free and you can type any word and get results. TV will likely be restricted too, with stations critical of China or Taiwan’s government being blocked.
Lee Long-hwa
New York
Good, bad or ugly?
I would also like to add a positive comment to Chaim Melamed’s letter about his incident with customs officers (Letters, July 16, page 8).
I’m a UK citizen, my wife is Taiwanese and my daughter has triple nationality: UK, Taiwan and South Africa, because she was born there, lucky girl. On a Saturday morning two years ago we were checking in at Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport prior to our 9am departure to the UK when we were informed that my daughter’s Republic of China passport had expired three days earlier, and that we would have to reapply for a new passport when the relevant office opened on Monday morning, and even with express action it would take at least one week to process.
Therefore imagine our surprise as we were putting our luggage into a taxi when a lady from the immigration department called us to say that she would process the new passport and we would receive it at 5pm. I immediately went to the airline desk and rebooked on their 8pm flight. After sitting in the airport all day we duly received the passport as promised and left for our summer holidays.
I respectfully remind everyone that this was a Saturday morning!
Upon returning to Taiwan I wrote a letter of thanks and recommendation for this immigration officer to the relevant department, who responded with a very positive reply, stating that the officer had received a commendation and a promotion.
Good things do happen in Taiwan.
Michael Wise
Taipei
In response to Vassilis Tso (Letters, July 17, page 8), both my child’s passports (Canadian and Taiwanese) were presented to immigration. Having traveled through a good part of the world, this was the first time that I ever witnessed a valid Canadian passport not being accepted as proof of citizenship. It is not a case of our misunderstanding procedures but of a willful and arbitrary judgment by an arrogant lackey.
The officer’s opinion that my son is not Canadian was ludicrous and grotesque. The Canadian government considers my son to be a Canadian citizen and gave him a passport and citizenship card. Is this insufficient?
Chaim Melamed
Pingtung
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS