Impress with democracy
Already the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is forgetting just what Taiwan stands for and offers the world. “The mainlanders will be our guests,” Premier Liu Chao-shiuan (劉兆玄) said.
“I hope we can work together to impress them with the Taiwanese people’s good nature, politeness, passion and hospitality,” he said.
What about impressing Chinese tourists with democracy, freedom of the press, of religion, of association, of the Internet, to demonstrate, to travel, to criticize the government, the right to privacy and the guarantee of due process of law and a host of other concepts that the tourists may not know even exist?
What about impressing Chinese tourists with the real story about how China is, not how China presents itself to its people through propaganda, restricted access to the Internet and tyranny?
Giving Chinese a good impression of Taiwan is certainly a good strategy. But for oppressed people, just being able to see these things in the newspapers and on TV will open their eyes.
But if the premier has trouble speaking up about the essence of freedom in Taiwan, how can the Chinese judge us? I suspect the government’s plan is to shield Chinese tourists from such things.
Such as no Internet at hotels where Chinese tourists stay because they might find out that the Internet is free and you can type any word and get results. TV will likely be restricted too, with stations critical of China or Taiwan’s government being blocked.
Lee Long-hwa
New York
Good, bad or ugly?
I would also like to add a positive comment to Chaim Melamed’s letter about his incident with customs officers (Letters, July 16, page 8).
I’m a UK citizen, my wife is Taiwanese and my daughter has triple nationality: UK, Taiwan and South Africa, because she was born there, lucky girl. On a Saturday morning two years ago we were checking in at Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport prior to our 9am departure to the UK when we were informed that my daughter’s Republic of China passport had expired three days earlier, and that we would have to reapply for a new passport when the relevant office opened on Monday morning, and even with express action it would take at least one week to process.
Therefore imagine our surprise as we were putting our luggage into a taxi when a lady from the immigration department called us to say that she would process the new passport and we would receive it at 5pm. I immediately went to the airline desk and rebooked on their 8pm flight. After sitting in the airport all day we duly received the passport as promised and left for our summer holidays.
I respectfully remind everyone that this was a Saturday morning!
Upon returning to Taiwan I wrote a letter of thanks and recommendation for this immigration officer to the relevant department, who responded with a very positive reply, stating that the officer had received a commendation and a promotion.
Good things do happen in Taiwan.
Michael Wise
Taipei
In response to Vassilis Tso (Letters, July 17, page 8), both my child’s passports (Canadian and Taiwanese) were presented to immigration. Having traveled through a good part of the world, this was the first time that I ever witnessed a valid Canadian passport not being accepted as proof of citizenship. It is not a case of our misunderstanding procedures but of a willful and arbitrary judgment by an arrogant lackey.
The officer’s opinion that my son is not Canadian was ludicrous and grotesque. The Canadian government considers my son to be a Canadian citizen and gave him a passport and citizenship card. Is this insufficient?
Chaim Melamed
Pingtung
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers