Impress with democracy
Already the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is forgetting just what Taiwan stands for and offers the world. “The mainlanders will be our guests,” Premier Liu Chao-shiuan (劉兆玄) said.
“I hope we can work together to impress them with the Taiwanese people’s good nature, politeness, passion and hospitality,” he said.
What about impressing Chinese tourists with democracy, freedom of the press, of religion, of association, of the Internet, to demonstrate, to travel, to criticize the government, the right to privacy and the guarantee of due process of law and a host of other concepts that the tourists may not know even exist?
What about impressing Chinese tourists with the real story about how China is, not how China presents itself to its people through propaganda, restricted access to the Internet and tyranny?
Giving Chinese a good impression of Taiwan is certainly a good strategy. But for oppressed people, just being able to see these things in the newspapers and on TV will open their eyes.
But if the premier has trouble speaking up about the essence of freedom in Taiwan, how can the Chinese judge us? I suspect the government’s plan is to shield Chinese tourists from such things.
Such as no Internet at hotels where Chinese tourists stay because they might find out that the Internet is free and you can type any word and get results. TV will likely be restricted too, with stations critical of China or Taiwan’s government being blocked.
Lee Long-hwa
New York
Good, bad or ugly?
I would also like to add a positive comment to Chaim Melamed’s letter about his incident with customs officers (Letters, July 16, page 8).
I’m a UK citizen, my wife is Taiwanese and my daughter has triple nationality: UK, Taiwan and South Africa, because she was born there, lucky girl. On a Saturday morning two years ago we were checking in at Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport prior to our 9am departure to the UK when we were informed that my daughter’s Republic of China passport had expired three days earlier, and that we would have to reapply for a new passport when the relevant office opened on Monday morning, and even with express action it would take at least one week to process.
Therefore imagine our surprise as we were putting our luggage into a taxi when a lady from the immigration department called us to say that she would process the new passport and we would receive it at 5pm. I immediately went to the airline desk and rebooked on their 8pm flight. After sitting in the airport all day we duly received the passport as promised and left for our summer holidays.
I respectfully remind everyone that this was a Saturday morning!
Upon returning to Taiwan I wrote a letter of thanks and recommendation for this immigration officer to the relevant department, who responded with a very positive reply, stating that the officer had received a commendation and a promotion.
Good things do happen in Taiwan.
Michael Wise
Taipei
In response to Vassilis Tso (Letters, July 17, page 8), both my child’s passports (Canadian and Taiwanese) were presented to immigration. Having traveled through a good part of the world, this was the first time that I ever witnessed a valid Canadian passport not being accepted as proof of citizenship. It is not a case of our misunderstanding procedures but of a willful and arbitrary judgment by an arrogant lackey.
The officer’s opinion that my son is not Canadian was ludicrous and grotesque. The Canadian government considers my son to be a Canadian citizen and gave him a passport and citizenship card. Is this insufficient?
Chaim Melamed
Pingtung
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS