Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Vice Chairman John Kuan’s (關中) was recently quoted by Hong Kong’s Wen Wei Po newspaper as saying that “it was the KMT’s ‘sincere hope’ that peaceful unification between the two sides would eventually come if the party stays in power for an extended time.”
Kuan denied earlier this week that he made the remarks, and it is virtually impossible for the Taiwanese public to find out the truth.
Was the report fictional, a distortion of the facts or accurate?
Taiwan’s pan-blue-camp politicians hate it when people label them as pro-communist, and they also like to solve problems through litigious means.
For instance, when former Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators Wang Shu-hui (王淑慧) and Sandy Yen (莊和子) referred to China Philanthropy Justice Party Chairman Chin Nien-tzu (金念慈) as a communist, the Taipei District Prosecutors’ Office was of the opinion that the word “communist” defamed Chin, and indicted Wang and Yen.
For this reason, I suggest that Kuan also file a lawsuit against official Chinese media outlets that published the remarks for in effect tagging him as the same.
Of those outlets, the Wen Wei Po is registered in Hong Kong, while the others are registered in China.
There is no such thing as judicial independence in China, thus it should be the Wen Wei Po that is held accountable.
Hong Kong’s legal system has already gradually Sinicized, but during a recent visit to Hong Kong, Chinese Vice President Xi Jinping (習近平) proposed that the executive, legislative and judicial branches of the Hong Kong government should understand and support each other.
The Hong Kong Bar Association, now chaired by a member of the Political Consultative Conference in Guangdong Province, then made it clear that the judiciary must be independent of the executive and legislative branches.
This statement resolved the concerns of some in the legal community and the general public who worried that the association would be influenced by China’s “united front” strategy.
Although Hong Kong is part of China, this move clearly shows that the people there have more moral integrity and professionalism than Taiwanese politicians who do nothing but adulate China.
Therefore, if Kuan has done nothing that China could take advantage of, he might as well sue the Wen Wei Po for libel. I would be willing to act as a middle man in contacting a Hong Kong lawyer.
However, there are other things worth considering. Kuan has also been quoted as saying that: “I always feel much more excited when I visit the Mainland than when I stay in Taiwan.”
I wonder what it is that excites Kuan so.
If it is because the party-state has disappeared in Taiwan but stubbornly remains in China, and that there is every prospect that China will continue along that road, then he would be violating what Sun Yat-sen (孫逸仙) described as the “vigorous current of democracy,” not to mention world trends.
If the Wen Wei Po is eventually proven to have published a report based on rumor, we should acknowledge Kuan’s innocence.
But allowing Chinese media outlets to station reporters in Taiwan will only provide them with more opportunities to spread rumors and distort the truth.
Paul Lin is a political commentator based in Taiwan.
Translated by Ted Yang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS